ADVERTISEMENT


The purpose of this study was to determine if differences exist in peak torque and total work performed when the Johnson Anti-Shear Device was utilized as compared to the standard shin adapter during knee extension. The Cybex II, in conjunction with the HUMAC computer system was used in this study. Twenty-seven healthy subjects, with no history of knee pathology, were tested on successive days at speeds of 60°/sec and 180°/sec. Results demonstrated a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in peak torque at low speeds as well as total work performed at high speeds when using the anti-shear device. The findings indicate that the clinician/researcher must be consistent with the choice of shin pad in order to ensure valid, reliable data.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1988;9(8):284-286.