Paraspinal Musculature and Skin Temperature Changes: Comparing the ThermaCare HeatWrap, the Johnson & Johnson Back Plaster, and the ABC Warme-Pflaster

Cynthia A. Trowbridge, David O. Draper, J. Brent Feland, Lisa S. Jutte, Dennis L. Eggett

DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2004.1168

Study Design: Prospective, randomized, crossover design. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of the Johnson & Johnson Back Plaster, the ABC Warme-Pflaster, and the ThermaCare HeatWrap on skin and paraspinal muscle temperature. Also, to compare the subjects’ heat perception for the 3 products. Background: Heat therapy is a common treatment for low back pain and disability. There are a number of products on the market that are suggested to relieve low back pain by providing warmth to the back; however, their effectiveness for increasing tissue temperature compared with heat sensation has not been tested. Methods and Measures: To measure paraspinal muscle temperature, 1 thermocouple monofilament was inserted into the paraspinal muscle 2 cm from the skin surface at the L3 level using a 20-gauge 1.25-in (3.15-cm) sterile catheter. To measure skin interface temperature, 2 thermocouples were placed on the skin at distances of 5 cm and 7 cm from the insertion site. The Isothermex was used to record temperatures to the nearest 0.1°C for 120 minutes. The subjects also rated heat perception using a 10-cm visual analog scale at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. Analysis of covariance models was used for statistical analysis. Results: There was a significant product × time interaction (F_14,231 = 3.77, P<.0001) at the intramuscular site, but there was not a significant product × time interaction (F_14,231 = 1.03, P = .4228) at the skin site. Both the main effects for product (F_2,33 = 41.59, P<.0001) and time (F_3,51 = 19.02, P<.0001) were significant for the visual analog scale data. The ThermaCare HeatWrap produced significant increases in both skin and intramuscular temperatures with less heat sensation. The Johnson & Johnson Back Plaster and the ABC Warme-Pflaster increased temperature at the skin surface and provided the greatest heat sensations, but they did not provide intramuscular heat. Conclusions: The ThermaCare HeatWrap is more effective at increasing temperature at a 2-cm depth with less perceived heat compared to the Johnson & Johnson Back Plaster and the ABC Warme-Pflaster. The latter 2 products provide a sensation of heat but do not actually provide a muscle temperature change at a depth of 2 cm.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(9):549-558. doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.1168

Key Words: heat, low back, physical agents, temperature

View Full Article