ADVERTISEMENT
Despite the severity of ankle syndesmosis injuries, it has been argued that they are relatively poorly detected. This study investigated the interrater reliability of 4 orthopaedic tests for ankle syndesmosis injury and assessed their ability to predict the extended recovery times that have been reported as a consequence of this injury. Nine physiotherapists, working in random pairings, examined 53 subjects, all receiving treatment for ankle injury at 2 private clinics. Each subject was tested by 2 physiotherapists who independently performed the palpation test, external rotation test, squeeze test, and dorsiflexion-compression test. Kappa coefficient testing indicated that the external rotation test had the best interrater reliability (K = 0.75). The squeeze test was found to have moderate reliability (K = 0.50), and the palpation and dorsiflexion-compression tests both had only fair reliability (K = 0.36). The degree of pair-wise association between the results of the 4 tests was low (phi = 0.30 for all test combinations), suggesting that if all 4 tests were performed on the same subject, it was not likely that they would achieve similar results. Follow-up interviews were conducted to determine the time taken for subjects to walk 10 m without pain and, for sports injuries, the time taken to return to training and then to competition. For each test, Mann-Whitney U values showed no significant difference between the recovery times of subjects with positive or negative test results, although subjects with recovery times markedly longer than normal were detected by 3 of the 4 tests. When an either/or combination of the external rotation and dorsiflexion-compression tests was considered, subjects with a positive test result took significantly longer to return to playing sports.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27(4):276-284.
Key Words: ankle, syndesmosis, manual tests, interrater reliability