Research Report
Todd S. Ellenbecker, E. Paul Roetert, Patty A. Piorkowski, David A. Schulz
Objective measurement of range of motion of the glenohumeral joint is important for the rehabilitation and prevention of shoulder injury. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether significant differences exist between the dominant (tennis playing) and nondominant extremity in active internal and external rotation range of motion in elite junior tennis players 11-17 years of age. Two hundred three elite junior tennis players (113 males, 90 females) were bilaterally measured for internal and external rotation at 90° of abduction in a supine position with a specific methodology attempting to isolate glenohumeral motion, while minimizing or negating scapulothoracic motion. A standard universal goniometer was utilized to measure active range of motion (AROM). Dependent t tests were used to compare differences between extremities. No significant difference was found for males or females between the dominant and nondominant arm in external rotation. Analysis of internal rotation (AROM) differences showed significantly less (p < .001) internal rotation (AROM) on the dominant arm for both males and females. Significantly less (p < .001) dominant arm total rotational range of motion was also found in both males and females. The loss of dominant arm internal rotation (AROM) has clinical application for both the development of rehabilitation and preventative flexibility/range of motion programs.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;24(6):336-341.
Key Words: shoulder, joint motion, tennis
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Roberto Merletti, Serge H. Roy
Endurance is a clinically relevant muscle parameter. It would be desirable to be able to estimate it without the need for a contraction sustained to exhaustion. The purpose of this work was to investigate the capability of the initial rate of spectral compression of the surface electromyographic (EMG) signal to predict mechanical endurance during sustained voluntary contractions of the human tibialis anterior muscle. Six healthy subjects performed voluntary isometric contractions of the tibialis anterior at 80, 70, 60, and 50% of the maximal voluntary contraction level. The contractions were sustained for 90, 120, 150, and 170 seconds, respectively. These intervals exceed the normal endurance time for this muscle and allow for a decrease of torque output. The slope of the median frequency, computed over the first 30 seconds of the contraction, was used to describe the initial spectral compression of the EMG signal. Significant correlations were found: 1) between contraction level and endurance time (p < 0.05 for each subject) and 2) between median (or mean) frequency slope and endurance time (p < 0.0001 for all subjects pooled together). The regression between median frequency slope and endurance time showed intersubject variations possibly related to the tibialis anterior muscle fiber type content. It is concluded that clinical use of the EMG spectral technique in assessing muscle fatigue may enable the clinician to estimate the endurance time without having the subject sustain a contraction until the point of contractile failure. This could be an advantage for some patient populations, such as the severely disabled, arthritic, or frail elderly that might not be able to tolerate long duration contractions.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;24(6):342-353.
Key Words: electromyography, muscle fatigue, conduction velocity
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Lorrie Maffey-Ward, Gwendolen A. Jull, Louise Wellington
Poor lumbar spine kinesthetic awareness is often observed in low back pain patients and is usually evaluated qualitatively in the clinical situation. The purpose of this study was to investigate a simple, kinesthetic test for the lumbar spine. The experimental protocol utilized a 3Space Fastrak™ to determine the error, within and between days, of 10 healthy subjects in reproducing a neutral lumbopelvic (T10-S2) position following movement into flexion. The mean value of the repositioning error for the sagittal plane movement (flexion/extension) over the 3 repetitions within day 1 was 2.6 ± 1.2° and for day 2 was 2.6 ± 1.7°. No statistically significant difference existed between days. These repositioning errors were well within the ranges described by other authors for various asymptomatic joint complexes. These results provide a basis for further evaluation of this test on patients with low back pain to investigate its ability to detect any kinesthetic deficit.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;24(6):354-358.
Key Words: lumbar spine, kinesthesia, measurement
View Abstract
View Full Article
Technical Note
M. Scott Sullivan, Janet M. Kues, Thomas Mayhew
Studies that evaluate effectiveness of physical therapy can be problematic because frequently several treatment techniques are used during an episode of care. Methods that categorize treatment techniques into discrete categories may be useful in studying treatment outcomes. The purpose of this study was to describe a method to create treatment categories used for patients with low back pain. We surveyed physical therapists in Virginia to identify frequently used treatments for patients with low back pain. One hundred fifty-five surveys were completed. Twenty-eight treatments, used frequently or very frequently by 50% or more of the respondents, were retained for analysis. Factor analysis was used to identify treatment categories. Seven categories were identified: McKenzie approach, manual therapy, exercise with equipment, active and stretching exercise, physical agents, aerobic exercise and walking, and ergonomic activities. Indices for the categories were created. Confirmatory factor analyses should be performed on a different sample to validate these findings.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;24(6):359-364.
Key Words: low back pain, physical therapy, factor analysis
View Abstract
View Full Article
Index
This index includes all authors and co-authors of manuscripts published in the Journal from July through December 1996.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;24(6):373-375.
View Abstract
View Full Article
Index
Index by subject of all manuscripts published by the Journal from July through December 1996.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;24(6):376-381.
View Abstract
View Full Article