Editorial
Joseph J. Godges
Recent years have brought about an expansion of physical therapy residency and fellowship programs, providing physical therapists the opportunity to accelerate the development of their clinical skills through a structured mentoring process. Along with the expansion of residency and fellowship programs, a process has been created to formally evaluate and credential programs that meet specific standards. Standardized, structured mentoring helps newly graduated physical therapists accelerate their professional growth and their ability to provide optimal patient care.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004; 34(1):1-3. doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.0101.
Key Words: education, mentorship, profession
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Gregory M. Karst, Gilbert M. Willett
Study Design: A repeated-measures, counterbalanced design. Objectives: To test whether subjects could learn and retain the ability to alter the relative activity of abdominal muscle groups when performing trunk curl exercises. Background: Although trunk curl exercises are widely prescribed, a disadvantage of trunk curls is that they primarily activate rectus abdominis, while the internal and external oblique abdominis muscles are considered to be more important contributors to lumbar stability. Methods and Measures: A convenience sample of 25 subjects performed trunk curl exercises in accordance with 3 different sets of instructions: nonspecific instructions (NS), instructions intended to emphasize rectus abdominis activity (RE), and instructions intended to emphasize oblique abdominis activity (OE). Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from the upper and lower rectus and the internal and external oblique abdominis muscles while a physical target was used to insure that the trunk was raised to the same height for all conditions. Normalized root-mean-square EMG amplitude measures were used to test for instruction-dependent changes in the relative EMG activity of the rectus and oblique muscle groups. Results: Following a single, brief, instruction session, subjects performing trunk curls had significantly greater normalized oblique:rectus EMG ratios when following OE instructions (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 1.45 ± 0.34) than when following RE (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 0.76 ± 0.24) or NS (mean [±SD] oblique-rectus ratio, 0.63 ± 0.23) instructions. Retesting 1 week later indicated that subjects retained this skill. Conclusions: With minimal instruction, subjects are able to volitionally alter the relative activity of the oblique and rectus abdominis muscles when performing trunk curls. Incorporating instructions emphasizing oblique abdominis activity into lumbar stabilization programs appears promising and has potential advantages over other approaches to altering abdominal muscle activity during trunk curls.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(1):4-12. doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.1145
Key Words: electromyography, lumbar spine, lumbar stabilization, rehabilitation
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
David O. Draper, Jennifer L. Castro, J. Brent Feland, Shane S. Schulthies, Dennis L. Eggett
Study Design: A randomized, counterbalanced 2×3×5 repeated-measures design. Objective: To compare changes in hamstring flexibility after treatments of pulsed shortwave diathermy and prolonged stretch, sham diathermy and prolonged stretch, and control. Background: Heat and stretch techniques have been touted for years. To date, the effect of shortwave diathermy and hamstring stretching has not been studied. Because diathermy heats a large area and penetrates deep into the muscle, use of this device prior to or during hamstring stretching may increase flexibility. Methods and Measures: Thirty college-age students (mean age, 21.5 years) with tight hamstrings (inability to achieve greater than 160° knee extension at 90° hip flexion) participated. Subjects were assigned to 1 of 3 groups: diathermy and stretch, sham diathermy and stretch, and control). Range of motion was recorded before and after each treatment for 5 days and on day 8. A straight leg-raise stretch was performed using a mechanical apparatus. Subjects in the diathermy-and-stretch group received 10 minutes of diathermy (distal hamstrings) followed by 5 minutes of simultaneous diathermy and stretch, followed by 5 minutes of stretching only. Subjects in the sham-diathermy-and-stretch group followed the same protocol, but with the diathermy unit turned off. Subjects in the control group lay on the table for 20 minutes. Data were analyzed using an ANOVA and post hoc t tests. Results: Mean (± pooled SE) increases in knee extension after 5 days were 15.8° ± 2.2° for the diathermy-and-stretch group, 5.2° ± 2.2° for the sham-diathermy-and-stretch group, and –0.3° ± 2.2° for the control group. Seventy-two hours after the last treatment, the diathermy-and-stretch group lost 1.9° ± 2.2°, the sham-diathermy-and-stretch group lost 3.0° ± 2.2°, and the control group changed –0.4° ± 2.2°. Conclusion: These results suggest that hamstring flexibility can be greatly improved when shortwave diathermy is used in conjunction with prolonged stretching.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(1):13-20. doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.0978
Key Words: heat, muscle, range of motion, thigh
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Jennifer E. Stevens, Ryan L. Mizner, Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Study Design: A case series. Objectives: The purpose of this case series was to assess the effect of high-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on quadriceps strength and voluntary activation following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Background: Following TKA, patients exhibit long-term weakness of the quadriceps and diminished functional capacity compared to age-matched healthy controls. The pain and swelling that results from surgery may contribute to quadriceps weakness. The use of high-intensity NMES has previously been shown to be effective in quickly restoring quadriceps strength in patients with weakness after surgery. Methods and Measures: All patients were treated for 6 weeks, 2 to 3 visits per week, in outpatient rehabilitation. Five patients (NMES group) participated in a voluntary exercise program for both knees and NMES for the weaker knee. Three patients (exercise group) participated in a voluntary exercise program for both knees without NMES. For each treatment session, 10 isometric electrically elicited muscle contractions were administered at maximally tolerated doses to the initially weaker leg of the NMES group. Quadriceps strength and muscle activation were repeatedly assessed up to 6 months after surgery using burst superimposition techniques. Results: At 6 months, the weak NMES-treated legs of 4 of 5 patients in the NMES group had surpassed the strength of the contralateral leg. In contrast, none of the weak legs in the exercise group were stronger than the contralateral leg at 6 months. Changes in quadriceps muscle activation mirrored the changes exhibited in strength. Conclusion: When NMES was added to a voluntary exercise program, deficits in quadriceps muscle strength and activation resolved quickly after TKA.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(1):21-29. doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.0947
Key Words: geriatric, inhibition, rehabilitation, total knee replacement
View Abstract
View Full Article
CSM Information
Guy G. Simoneau
The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy is pleased to publish abstracts of research presentations made by the Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy Sections during the 2004 Combined Sections Meeting (CSM) in Nashville, TN, February 4-8, 2004. This collection of abstracts provides a glimpse into the research presented as part of the scientific programming of these two sections. The number and variety of the presentations scheduled for CSM are testimony to the dynamic research activities taking place in the field of physical therapy. The abstracts presented here are reviewed and selected by members of the research committee of each section based on content and format. The abstracts are not, however, reviewed by the Associate Editors or the Editor-in-Chief of the JOSPT. By design, each abstract presents only a brief summary of a research project–a summary that typically does not permit a full evaluation of the scientific rigor with which the work was conducted.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(1):30.
View Abstract
View Full Article
February 4-8, 2004 Nashville, Tennessee
A summary of the schedule of platform and poster research presentations made by the Orthopaedic Section and Sports Physical Therapy Section of the American Physical Therapy Association during APTA’s Combined Sections Meeting.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(1):31-38.
View Abstract
View Full Article
The abstracts are presented here as prepared by the authors. The accuracy and content of each abstract remain the responsibility of the authors. In the identification number above each abstract, PL designates a platform presentation. The presenter’s name is underlined where that information was available to the JOSPT.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(1):A1-A22.
View Abstract
View Full Article
The abstracts are presented here as prepared by the authors. The accuracy and content of each abstract remain the responsibility of the authors. In the identification number above each abstract, PO designates a poster presentation. The presenter’s name is underlined where that information was available to the JOSPT. (PO258 withdrawn.)
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(1):A23-A51.
View Abstract
View Full Article
The abstracts are presented here as prepared by the authors. The accuracy and content of each abstract remain the responsibility of the authors. In the identification number above each abstract, PL designates a platform presentation. The presenter’s name is underlined where that information was available to the JOSPT.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(1):A52-A60.
View Abstract
View Full Article
The abstracts are presented here as prepared by the authors. The accuracy and content of each abstract remain the responsibility of the authors. In the identification number above each abstract, PO designates a poster presentation. The presenter’s name is underlined where that information was available to the JOSPT.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(1):A61-A65.
View Abstract
View Full Article