This special issue of the Journal is dedicated to the topic of manual physical therapy. The growing body of evidence supporting the effectiveness of manual physical therapy for a wide variety of patient populations makes this a timely and important topic. The variety of patient populations addressed in this special issue highlights the diversity of conditions for which manual physical therapy should play a role in evidence-based patient management. Like many aspects of practice, however, there appear to be barriers hindering the integration of the evidence supporting manual therapy into the decision-making processes of practicing clinicians and the curricula of programs educating physical therapists. These barriers need to be identified and dismantled, beginning with the language we choose to use.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004; 34(11):659-661. doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.0111

Key Words: language, manual therapy, patient populations

Study Design: One group pretest-posttest exploratory design. Objectives: Primary purposes of this study were to examine the short-term effect of hip mobilizations on pain and range of motion (ROM) measurements in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to determine the prevalence of painful hip and squat test findings in both patients with knee OA and asymptomatic subjects. The secondary purposes were to assess intrarater reliability and to determine whether fewer subjects experienced painful test findings following hip mobilization. Background: Conservative intervention, including manual physical therapy applied to the lower extremity, has been shown to reduce impairments associated with knee OA. Methods and Measures: One rater pair administered 4 clinical hip tests to 22 patients with knee OA (mean age, 61.2 years; SD, 6.1 years) and 17 subjects without lower extremity symptoms or known pathology (mean age, 64.0 years; SD, 7.9 years). Intrarater reliability was examined for each clinical test. Patients with knee OA and painful-hip and squat test findings received hip mobilizations. Pain and ROM responses for each test were dependent variables. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients for all tests were greater than 0.87. Composite and individual test pain scores and ROM scores improved significantly following hip mobilization. All clinical test findings were more frequent in the group with knee OA, except for those of the FABER test, and the number of subjects with painful test findings following hip mobilization was reduced for all tests except the hip flexion test. Conclusions: Patients experienced increases in ROM, decreased pain, and fewer subjects had painful test findings immediately following a single session of hip mobilizations. Examination and intervention of the hip may be indicated in patients with knee OA.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(11):676-685. doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.1432

The original article was corrected in September 2007, and the amended article PDF is provided here. Please see Correction: Altman's criteria for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007; 37(9):573.

Key Words: arthritis, lower extremity, manual therapy, provocation

Study Design: Case series. Objective: To describe the management of 7 patients with grade 1 cervical compressive myelopathy attributed to herniated disc using intermittent cervical traction and manipulation of the thoracic spine. Background: Intermittent cervical traction has been indicated for the treatment of patients with herniated disc and has been suggested to be helpful for patients with cervical compressive myelopathy. Manipulation of the thoracic spine has been utilized to safely improve active range of motion and decrease pain in patients with neck pain. Methods and Measures: Seven women with neck pain, 35 to 45 years of age, were identified as having signs and symptoms consistent with grade 1 cervical compressive myelopathy. Symptom duration ranged from less than 1 week to 52 weeks. All patients were treated with intermittent cervical traction and thoracic manipulation for a median of 9 sessions (range, 2-12 sessions) over a median of 56 days (range, 14-146 days). Numeric Pain Rating Scale and Functional Rating Index scores served as the primary outcome measures. Results: The median decrease in pain scores was 5 (range, 2-8) from a baseline of 6 (range, 4-8), and median improvement in Functional Rating Index scores was 26% (range, 10%-50%) from a baseline of 44% (range, 35%-71%). Dizziness was eliminated in 3 out of 4 patients and chronic headache symptoms were improved in 3 out of 3 patients. There were no adverse events or outcomes. Conclusions: Intermittent cervical traction and manipulation of the thoracic spine seem useful for the reduction of pain scores and level of disability in patients with mild cervical compressive myelopathy attributed to herniated disc. A thorough neurological screening exam is recommended prior to mechanical treatment of the cervical spine.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(11):701-712. doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.1519

Key Words: conservative, Hoffmann’s reflex, mechanical traction, spinal cord impingement, upper motor neuron

Study Design: Case series. Objective: To describe an impairment-based physical therapy treatment approach for 4 patients with plantar heel pain. Background: There is limited evidence from clinical trials on which to base treatment decision making for plantar heel pain. Methods and Measures: Four patients completed a course of physical therapy based on an impairment-based model. All patients received manual physical therapy and stretching. Two patients were also treated with custom orthoses, and 1 patient received an additional strengthening program. Outcome measures included a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and self-reported functional status. Results: Symptom duration ranged from 6 to 52 weeks (mean duration ± SD, 33 ± 19 weeks). Treatment duration ranged from 8 to 49 days (mean duration ± SD, 23 ± 18 days), with number of treatment sessions ranging from 2 to 7 (mode, 3). All 4 patients reported a decrease in NPRS scores from an average (± SD) of 5.8 ± 2.2 to 0 (out of 10) during previously painful activities. Additionally, all patients returned to prior activity levels. Conclusion: In this case series, patients with plantar heel pain treated with an impairment-based physical therapy approach emphasizing manual therapy demonstrated complete pain relief and full return to activities. Further research is necessary to determine the effectiveness of impairment-based physical therapy interventions for patients with plantar heel pain/plantar fasciitis.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(11):725-733. doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.1506

Key Words: ankle, manipulation, mobilization, plantar fasciitis