STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To determine if changes in transversus abdominis (TrA) and internal oblique (IO) muscle thickness and side-to-side symmetry differ in individuals with and without unilateral lumbopelvic pain while at rest and during the abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM). BACKGROUND: Although the ADIM has been found to produce a symmetrical change in TrA and IO muscle thickness in healthy subjects, how these muscles are activated in those with unilateral lumbopelvic pain during the ADIM remains unknown. METHODS: Fifteen subjects with lumbopelvic pain and 15 age- and gender-matched control subjects were recruited. To investigate a similar subgroup of patients with lumbopelvic pain that has been used in previous research, subjects were required to have unilateral symptoms, a positive sacroiliac provocation test, and a positive active straight-leg raise test. Ultrasound images were obtained bilaterally at 2 different points during each trial of the ADIM: (1) at rest and (2) while maintaining the ADIM. Average percent change in thickness of the TrA and IO muscles was obtained over 3 trials. RESULTS: The percent change in thickness of the TrA was 20.9% less in those with lumbopelvic pain compared to the control group (P = .035), while the percent change in IO thickness was equivalent between groups (P = .522). No differences were observed for the TrA or IO muscles between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides in those with (TrA, P = .263; IO, P = .172) or without (TrA, P = .780; IO, P = .635) lumbopelvic pain during the ADIM. Changes in TrA muscle thickness were greater than the IO muscle during the ADIM for both groups (P<.001). Specifically, the increases in TrA muscle thickness in those with and without lumbopelvic dysfunction were 32.7% and 47.3% greater, respectively, compared to changes in the IO muscle. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with unilateral lumbopelvic pain demonstrated a smaller increase in thickness of the TrA muscle during the ADIM. This finding provides an element of construct validity for the use of the ADIM for assessing TrA muscle thickness in those with unilateral lumbopelvic pain. However, both groups demonstrated a symmetrical side-to-side change in TrA and IO muscle thickness despite the symptomatic group having unilateral symptoms. Further, we detected a preferential change in TrA muscle thickness during the ADIM in both groups.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(11):791-798, Epub 15 October 2009. doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.3128

KEY WORDS: internal oblique, lumbar stabilization exercise, sacroiliac dysfunction, transversus abdominis, ultrasound imaging

STUDY DESIGN: Experimental laboratory testing using a cross-sectional design. OBJECTIVES: To determine if functional performance deficits are present in individuals with functional ankle instability (FAI) in 4 single-limb hopping tests, including figure-of-8 hop, side hop, 6-meter crossover hop, and square hop. BACKGROUND: Conflicting results exist regarding the presence of functional deficits in individuals with FAI. It is important to evaluate whether functional performance deficits are present in this population, as well as if subjective feelings of giving way can assist in identifying these deficits. METHODS: Sixty college students volunteered for this study. Thirty participants with unilateral ankle instability were placed in the FAI group and 30 participants with no history of ankle injuries were placed in the control group. The FAI group was subsequently further divided to indicate those that reported giving way during the functional test (FAI-GW) and those that did not (FAI-NGW). Time to complete each test was recorded and the mean of 3 trials for each test were used for statistical analysis. To identify performance differences, we used 4 mixed-design 2-way (side-by-group) ANOVAs, 1 for each hop test. A Tukey post hoc test was completed on all significant findings. RESULTS: We identified a significant side-by-group interaction for all 4 functional performance tests (P<.05). Specifically, for each functional performance test, the FAI limb performed significantly worse than the contralateral uninjured limb in the FAI-GW group. Additionally, the FAI limb in the FAI-GW group performed worse than the FAI limb in the FAI-NGW group, and the matched limb in the control group in 3 of the 4 functional performance tests. CONCLUSION: We found that functional performance deficits were present in participants with FAI who also experienced instability during the test. This difference was identified when comparing the FAI limb to the contralateral uninjured limb as well as control participants. However, the performance deficits identified in this study were relatively small. Future research in this area is needed to further evaluate the clinical meaningfulness of these findings. Finally, we found that limb dominance did not affect performance.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(11):799-806, Epub 15 October 2009. doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.3042

KEY WORDS: 6-meter crossover hop, agility, figure-of-8 hop, side hop, square hop

STUDY DESIGN: Case report. BACKGROUND: No head-to-head comparisons of different orthoses for patients with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) have been performed to date. Additionally, the cost of orthoses varies considerably, thus choosing an effective orthosis that is affordable to the patient is largely a trial-and-error process. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 77-year-old woman was seen with complaints of abnormal foot posture ('my foot is out'), minimal medial foot and ankle pain, and a 3-year history of conservatively managed stage II PTTD. The patient was not able to complete 1 single-limb heel rise on the involved side, while she could complete 3 on the uninvolved side. Ankle strength testing revealed a mild to moderate loss of plantar flexor strength (20%-31% deficit on the involved side), combined with a 22% deficit in isometric ankle inversion and forefoot adduction strength. To assist this patient in managing her flatfoot posture and PTTD, 3 orthoses were considered: an off-the-shelf ankle-foot orthosis (AFO), a custom solid AFO, and a custom articulated AFO. The patient's chief complaint was partly cosmetic (ìmy foot is outî). As decreasing flatfoot kinematics may unload the tibialis posterior muscle, thus prevent the progression of foot deformity, the primary goal of orthotic intervention was to improve flatfoot kinematics. Given the difficulties in clinical approaches to evaluating flatfoot kinematics, a quantitative gait analysis, using a multisegment foot model, was used. OUTCOMES: In the frontal plane, all 3 orthoses were associated with small changes toward hindfoot inversion. In the sagittal plane, between 2.7° and 6.1°, greater forefoot plantar flexion (raising the medial longitudinal arch) occurred. There were no differences among the orthoses on hindfoot inversion and forefoot plantar flexion. In the transverse plane, the off-the-shelf design was associated with forefoot abduction, the custom solid orthosis was associated with no change, and the custom articulated orthosis was associated with forefoot adduction. DISCUSSION: Based on gait analysis, the higher-cost custom articulated orthosis was chosen as optimal for the patient. This custom articulated orthosis was associated with the greatest change in flatfoot deformity, assessed using gait analysis. The patient felt it produced the greatest correction in foot deformity. Reducing flatfoot deformity while allowing ankle movement may limit progression of stage II PTTD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 4.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(11):816-824, Epub 15 October 2009. doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.3107

KEY WORDS: biomechanics, PTTD, tendinopathy

This was the third research meeting focused on scapular function and dysfunction, following similar meetings in 2003 and 2006. The purpose of this meeting, hosted by the Shoulder Center of Kentucky, was to continue to examine the biomechanical and clinical factors thought to be associated with the role of the scapula in shoulder function and dysfunction. Since the last Summit, much more information has been created in this area, and it was thought that enough progress had been made that an organized overview of current knowledge could provide some consensus statements to guide further research and provide assessment and treatment guidelines. A call for abstracts was extended to researchers with proven interest and published research on the scapula. The meeting was organized around 3 primary categories of information: scapular kinematics and dysfunction, clinical evaluation of the scapula, and interventions. The last session of the meeting involved development of consensus statements for each category. This document represents the current state of knowledge concerning the aspects of scapular function and dysfunction discussed at the Summit. It is expected that, as more knowledge is developed, the gaps will be filled in and a clearer understanding of the roles of the scapula in shoulder function will emerge. This issue includes the consensus statements and abstracts from the Summit.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(11):A1-A13. doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.0303

A selection of important abstracts of articles published in other journals.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(11):832-841.