Research Report
Amee L. Seitz, Philip W. McClure, Sheryl Finucane, Jessica M. Ketchum, Matthew K. Walsworth, N. Douglas Boardman, Lori A. Michener
STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of the modified scapular assistance test (SAT) on 3-dimensional shoulder kinematics, strength, and linear measures of subacromial space in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS). BACKGROUND: Abnormal scapular kinematics have been identified in patients with SAIS. Increased scapular upward rotation and posterior tilt, as induced with manual assistance using the SAT, have been theorized to increase subacromial space and may alter shoulder strength. METHODS: Forty-two subjects (21 with SAIS and 21 controls) participated in this study. The anterior outlet of the subacromial space, measured via the acromiohumeral distance on ultrasound images, and 3-dimensional scapular kinematics, measured using motion analysis, were determined with the arm at rest, and at 45° and 90° of active elevation with and without the SAT. A dynamometer was used to measure isometric shoulder strength. Full factorial mixed-model analyses of variance evaluated the effects of the SAT on variables between groups. RESULTS: There was an increase in scapular posterior tilt at all angles, upward rotation at rest and 45° of elevation, and acromiohumeral distance at 45° and at 90° with the SAT. The SAT did not alter normalized isometric strength. There were no differences in response to the SAT between the SAIS and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Manual scapular assistance using the SAT influences factors associated with SAIS, such as subacromial space and potentially scapular orientation during static arm elevation, but not more so in individuals with SAIS than in healthy individuals. The SAT performed statically may be a way to identify potential subgroups of individuals with SAIS for whom subacromial space narrowing may be a contributing factor.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(5):400-412, Epub 27 January 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3579
KEY WORDS: acromiohumeral distance, examination, rotator cuff disease, shoulder, ultrasound imaging
View Abstract
View Full Article
View Slides
Clinical Commentary
Robert J. Nee, Gwendolen A. Jull, Bill Vicenzino, Michel W. Coppieters
SYNOPSIS: The validity of upper-limb neurodynamic tests (ULNTs) for detecting peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) was assessed by reviewing the evidence on plausibility, the definition of a positive test, reliability, and concurrent validity. Evidence was identified by a structured search for peer-reviewed articles published in English before May 2011. The quality of concurrent validity studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, where appropriate. Biomechanical and experimental pain data support the plausibility of ULNTs. Evidence suggests that a positive ULNT should at least partially reproduce the patient's symptoms and that structural differentiation should change these symptoms. Data indicate that this definition of a positive ULNT is reliable when used clinically. Limited evidence suggests that the median nerve test, but not the radial nerve test, helps determine whether a patient has cervical radiculopathy. The median nerve test does not help diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome. These findings should be interpreted cautiously, because diagnostic accuracy might have been distorted by the investigators' definitions of a positive ULNT. Furthermore, patients with PNP who presented with increased nerve mechanosensitivity rather than conduction loss might have been incorrectly classified by electrophysiological reference standards as not having PNP. The only evidence for concurrent validity of the ulnar nerve test was a case study on cubital tunnel syndrome. We recommend that researchers develop more comprehensive reference standards for PNP to accurately assess the concurrent validity of ULNTs and continue investigating the predictive validity of ULNTs for prognosis or treatment response.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(5):413-424, Epub 8 March 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3988
KEY WORDS: carpal tunnel syndrome, cervical radiculopathy, cubital tunnel syndrome, reliability
NOTE: Video for this article is not currently available but will be posted as soon as possible.
View Abstract
View Full Article
View Slides
Case Report
Teresa Riemer Smith
STUDY DESIGN: Case report. BACKGROUND: Symptomatic accessory navicular can be a source of pain and disability. The treatment considerations for accessory navicular in dancers may differ due to increased demands on the foot, the repetitive nature of the movements, and the specific footwear required. The purpose of this report is to describe the management (1 conservative and 1 postoperative) of 2 adolescent dancers with symptomatic accessory navicular. CASE DESCRIPTIONS: Case 1 was an 11-year-old female who underwent surgical excision of a symptomatic accessory navicular. Case 2 was a 15-year-old female who, following a traumatic injury that caused pain judged to be related to her accessory navicular, was managed nonsurgically. Treatment included pain management, range-of-motion exercises, trunk and lower extremity strengthening, balance and proprioception training, orthoses, crosstraining, and a guided return-to-dance progression. OUTCOMES: Both patients had improved pain, dance technique, strength, and patient-reported outcome scores that allowed a full return to dance. DISCUSSION: The 2 dancers presented here had foot pain believed to be related to a symptomatic accessory navicular. In both cases, treatment targeted specific impairments to improve function and disability. The guided progression of activities was intended to facilitate a return to dance that protected healing tissues and prevented a recurrence of symptoms. Clinicians should be aware of the effect of a symptomatic accessory navicular in the young dancer and potentially effective nonsurgical treatment options for this condition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 4.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(5):465-473, Epub 25 January 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3809
KEY WORDS: ballet, dance, foot
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Lise R. Stolze, Stephen C. Allison, John D. Childs
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To derive a preliminary clinical prediction rule for identifying a subgroup of patients with low back pain (LBP) likely to benefit from Pilates-based exercise. BACKGROUND: Pilates-based exercise has been shown to be effective for patients with LBP. However, no previous work has characterized patient attributes for those most likely to have a successful outcome from treatment. METHODS: Ninety-six individuals with nonspecific LBP participated in the study. Treatment response was categorized based on changes in the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire scores after 8 weeks. An improvement of 50% or greater was categorized as achieving a successful outcome. Thirty-seven variables measured at baseline were analyzed with univariate and multivariate methods to derive a clinical prediction rule for successful outcome with Pilates exercise. Accuracy statistics, receiver-operator curves, and regression analyses were used to determine the association between standardized examination variables and treatment response status. RESULTS: Ninety-five of 96 participants completed the study, with 51 (53.7%) achieving a successful outcome. A preliminary clinical prediction rule with 5 variables was identified: total trunk flexion range of motion of 70° or less, duration of current symptoms of 6 months or less, no leg symptoms in the last week, body mass index of 25 kg/m2 or greater, and left or right hip average rotation range of motion of 25° or greater. If 3 or more of the 5 attributes were present (positive likelihood ratio, 10.64), the probability of experiencing a successful outcome increased from 54% to 93%. CONCLUSION: These data provide preliminary evidence to suggest that the response to Pilates-based exercise in patients with LBP can be predicted from variables collected from the clinical examination. If subsequently validated in a randomized clinical trial, this prediction rule may be useful to improve clinical decision making in determining which patients are most likely to benefit from Pilates-based exercise.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(5):425-436, Epub 25 January 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3826
KEY WORDS: classification, lumbar spine, Pilates-based exercise, stabilization
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Heiliane de Brito Fontana, Alessandro Haupenthal, Caroline Ruschel, Marcel Hubert, Colette Ridehalgh, Helio Roesler
STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the vertical and anteroposterior components of the ground reaction force during stationary running performed in water and on dry land, focusing on the effect of gender, level of immersion, and cadence. BACKGROUND: Stationary running, as a fundamental component of aquatic rehabilitation and training protocols, is little explored in the literature with regard to biomechanical variables, which makes it difficult to determine and control the mechanical load acting on the individuals. METHODS: Twenty-two subjects performed 1 minute of stationary running on land, immersed to the hip, and immersed to the chest at 3 different cadences: 90 steps per minute, 110 steps per minute, and 130 steps per minute. Force data were acquired with a force plate, and the variables were vertical peak (Fy), loading rate (LR), anterior peak (Fx anterior), and posterior peak (Fx posterior). Data were normalized to subjects' body weight (BW) and analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Fy ranged from 0.98 to 2.11 BW, LR ranged from 5.38 to 11.52 BW/s, Fx anterior ranged from 0.07 to 0.14 BW, and Fx posterior ranged from 0.06 to 0.09 BW. The gender factor had no effect on the variables analyzed. A significant interaction between level of immersion and cadence was observed for Fy, Fx anterior, and Fx posterior. On dry land, Fy increased with increasing cadence, whereas in water this effect was seen only between 90 steps per minute and the 2 higher cadences. The higher the level of immersion, the lower the magnitude of Fy. LR was reduced under both water conditions and increased with increasing cadence, regardless of the level of immersion. CONCLUSION: Ground reaction forces during stationary running are similar between genders. Fy and LR are lower in water, though the values are increased at higher cadences.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(5):437-443, Epub 8 March 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3572
KEY WORDS: aquatic exercises, biomechanics, hydrotherapy, kinetics
View Abstract
View Full Article
View Slides
Perspectives for Patients
Aquatic physical therapy is a form of physical therapy performed in a pool. Exercising in water can be helpful in improving function, fitness, balance, coordination, flexibility, and strength. A study published in the May 2012 issue of JOSPT provides new insights on water's ability to decrease the load sustained by a runner, based on the depth of water in which the individual is running.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(5):445. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.0504
KEY WORDS: joint stress, pain, stationary running
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
William G. Boissonnault, Michael D. Ross
STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive. BACKGROUND: An important role for physical therapists in the healthcare delivery system is to recognize when patient referral to a physician or other healthcare provider is indicated. Few studies exist describing physical therapists' evaluative and diagnostic processes leading to patient referral to a physician. OBJECTIVE: To summarize published patient case reports that described physical therapist/patient episodes of care that resulted in the referral of the patient to a physician and a subsequent diagnosis of medical disease. METHODS: A literature search identified 78 case reports describing physical therapist referral of patients to physicians with subsequent diagnosis of a medical condition. Two evaluators reviewed the cases and summarized (1) how and when patients accessed physical therapy services, (2) timing of patient referral to a physician, (3) resultant medical diagnoses, (4) physical therapists' role in referral of patients for diagnostic testing, and (5) relevant patient symptom description, health history, review of systems, and physical examination findings. RESULTS: Fifty-eight (74.4%) of 78 patients had been referred to a physical therapist by their physician, while the remaining 20 patients accessed physical therapy services via direct access. The patients' primary presenting symptoms included pain (n = 60), weakness (n = 4), tingling/numbness (n = 2), or a combination (n = 12). Patient referrals to a physician occurred at the initial physical therapy session in 58 (74.4%) of 78 cases. A majority of patient referrals to a physician (n = 65) were related to primary presenting symptoms, including manifestations inconsistent with physician diagnosis, recent worsening without cause, unusual accompanying symptoms such as fatigue and/or weakness, and inadequate response to treatment. Resultant diagnoses included neuromusculoskeletal disorders (n = 53; fractures and tumors most common), visceral disorders (n = 14; cardiovascular involvement most common), and medication-related disorders (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: This review of published patient case reports provides numerous examples of physical therapists using effective multifactorial screening strategies for referred and direct-access patients, leading to timely patient referrals to physicians. The therapist-initiated patient referral to a physician led to subsequent diagnosis of a wide range of conditions and pathological processes.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(5):446-454, Epub 25 January 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3890
KEY WORDS: differential diagnosis, direct access, examination, imaging, physical therapy, screening
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Prajyot Kumta, Joy C. MacDermid, Saurabh P. Mehta, Paul W. Stratford
STUDY DESIGN: Psychometric study design. OBJECTIVES: To assess the test-retest reliability and convergent validity of the Functional Impairment Test-Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA) in patients with shoulder disorders. BACKGROUND: Performance tests that assess functional ability of patients with shoulder disorders can provide useful information for making clinical or return-to-activity decisions. No performance-based shoulder test has yet demonstrated sufficient relevance or clinical measurement properties. The FIT-HaNSA examines upper extremity performance during repetitive tasks that emphasize shoulder reaching and static postures and, therefore, has greater relevance for assessing performance. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with shoulder disorders and 65 healthy controls were recruited for the study. The FIT-HaNSA, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, isometric shoulder strength, and shoulder range of motion were assessed at baseline and repeated 2 to 7 days later. Test-retest reliability was described using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) and standard error of measurement. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the level of association between the FIT-HaNSA scores and the other measures. RESULTS: The ICCs for test-retest reliability for the FIT-HaNSA ranged from 0.89 to 0.97 in the patient group and 0.79 to 0.91 in the control group. The FIT-HaNSA showed high correlation with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and moderate correlations with shoulder range of motion and muscle strength. CONCLUSION: The FIT-HaNSA demonstrated high test-retest reliability and convergent validity with other related outcomes in patients with shoulder disorders. Further longitudinal studies are required to evaluate the responsiveness of the FIT-HaNSA in patients with different upper extremity conditions.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(5):455-464, Epub 25 January 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3796
KEY WORDS: performance measure, psychometrics, return to work, shoulder disability
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Janet A. Kneiss, Jeff R. Houck, Susan V. Bukata, J. Edward Puzas
STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study using a cross-sectional design. OBJECTIVES: To compare lower extremity force applications during a sit-to-stand (STS) task with and without upper extremity assistance in older individuals post–hip fracture to those of age-matched controls. BACKGROUND: A recent study documented the dependence on upper extremity assistance and the uninvolved lower limb during an STS task in individuals post–hip fracture. This study extends this work by examining the effect of upper extremity assistance on symmetry of lower extremity force applications. METHODS: Twenty-eight community-dwelling elderly subjects, 14 who had recovered from a hip fracture and 14 controls, participated in the study. All participants were independent ambulators. Four force plates were used to determine lower extremity force applications during an STS task with and without upper extremity assistance. The summed vertical ground reaction forces (vGRFs) of both limbs were used to determine STS phases (preparation/rising). The lower extremity force applications were assessed statistically using analysis of variance models. RESULTS: During the preparation phase, side-to-side symmetry of the rate of force development was significantly lower for the hip fracture group for both STS tasks (P<.001). During the rising phase, the vGRF impulse of the involved limb was significantly lower for the hip fracture group for both STS tasks (P = .045). The vGRF impulse for the uninvolved limb was significantly increased when participants with hip fracture did not use upper extremity assistance compared to elderly controls (P = .002). This resulted in a significantly lower vGRF symmetry for the hip fracture group during both STS tasks (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Participants with hip fracture who were discharged from rehabilitative care demonstrated decreased side-to-side symmetry of lower extremity loading during an STS task, irrespective of whether upper extremity assistance was provided. These findings suggest that learned motor control strategies may influence movement patterns post–hip fracture.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(5):474-481. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3562
KEY WORDS: biomechanics, chair, ground reaction forces
View Abstract
View Full Article
View Slides
Musculoskeletal Imaging
Samantha J. Hatfield, Richard E. Baxter
The patient was an 11-year-old female referred to a physical therapist because of a primary complaint of progressively worsening left anterior knee pain of 9 months' duration. Examination of the patient's left knee was unremarkable and did not reproduce the patient's primary complaint. However, range-of-motion assessment of the patient's left hip elicited pain in the left anterior/medial hip region and revealed decreased hip internal rotation and abduction. Due to concern about the possibility of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), the patient was immediately referred to her physician, and subsequent radiographs revealed a left SCFE.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(5):482. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.0408
KEY WORDS: hip pain, radiography
View Abstract
View Full Article
View Slides
Musculoskeletal Imaging
Eric K. Robertson, Chris Stanley
The patient was a 25-year-old woman who was referred to a physical therapist for a chief complaint of pain at the base of the occiput and left upper quarter region, as well as bilateral hand paresthesias. The findings of the history and physical examination were discussed with the patient's physician, who then ordered magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine, which revealed protrusion of the cerebellar tonsils 1 cm below the foramen magnum, consistent with a type 1 Chiari malformation.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(5):483. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.0409
KEY WORDS: cervical spine, magnetic resonance imaging, neck pain
View Abstract
View Full Article
View Slides
Letter to the Editor-in-Chief
Davide B. Albertoni, Donald A. Neumann
Letter to the Editor-in-Chief of JOSPT.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(5):484. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.0203
View Abstract
View Full Article