

Research Report
Amparo Hidalgo-Lozano, Carmen Calderón-Soto, Antonio Domingo-Camara, César Fernández-de-las-Peñas, Pascal Madeleine, Manuel Arroyo-Morales
STUDY DESIGN: Cross sectional cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences in the level of activation of neck-shoulder muscles between elite swimmers with and without shoulder pain during a functional upper limb task. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported altered motor control of the neck-shoulder muscles in patients with chronic neck-shoulder pain. Whether the activation of neck-shoulder muscles is altered among elite swimmers suffering from shoulder pain is unknown. METHODS: Surface electromyography (SEMG) from the sternocleidomastoid (SCM), upper trapezius (UT), and anterior scalene (SCL) muscles was recorded bilaterally in 17 elite swimmers (9 men, 8 women; mean ± SD age: 21±3 years) with unilateral shoulder pain, and 17 age- and sex matched elite swimmers without pain. Root mean square (RMS) values were calculated and normalized to assess the level of muscular activation 5 seconds before, 120 seconds and 150 seconds into, and 10 seconds after a functional upper limb task. RESULTS: The repeated measures revealed significant differences between both groups for RMS of both SCL (F=3.733; P=0.016), but not for the SCM and UT muscles. Swimmers with shoulder pain had higher normalised RMS in both SCL muscles at 120s (78% on average) and 150s (86% on average) into and 10s post-task (40% on average) as compared with swimmers without shoulder pain (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The elite swimmers with shoulder pain demonstrated greater activation of the SCL muscles during a functional task and a lower ability to relax the SCL muscles after completion of the task than elite swimmers without shoulder pain. The present findings suggest altered pattern of cervical muscle activation on elite swimmers with shoulder pain during performance of a functional task.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 25 January 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3875
KEY WORDS: electromyography, neck, scalene
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Deydre S. Teyhen, Scott W. Shaffer, Chelsea L. Lorenson, Joshua P. Halfpap, Dustin F. Donofry, Michael J. Walker, Jessica L. Dugan, John D. Childs
STUDY DESIGN: Reliability study. OBJECTIVES: To determine intrarater test-retest and interrater reliability of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) among novice raters. BACKGROUND: The FMS is used by various examiners to assess movement and predict time loss injuries in diverse populations (eg, youth to professional athletes, firefighters, military service members) of active participants. Unfortunately, critical analysis of the reliability of the FMS is currently limited to 1 sample of active college age participants. METHODS: Sixty-four active duty service members (mean ± SD age and body mass index: 25.2 ± 3.8 years, 25.1 ± 3.1 kg/m2) without a history of injury were enrolled. Participants completed the 7 component tests of the FMS in a counterbalanced order. Each component test was scored on an ordinal scale (0 to 3 points) resulting in a composite score from 0 to 21 points. Intrarater test-retest reliability was assessed between baseline scores and those obtained with repeated testing performed 48 to 72 hours later. Interrater reliability was assessed based on the assessment from 2 raters, selected from a pool of 8 novice raters, which assessed the same movements on day 2 simultaneously. Descriptive statistics, weighted Kappa (kw), and percent agreement were calculated on component scores. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of the measurements (SEM), minimal detectable chance (MDC95), and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated on composite scores. RESULTS: The average ± SD score on the FMS was 15.7 ± 0.2 points with 15.6% (n=10) of the participants scoring less than or equal to 14 points, the recommended cutoff for predicting time-loss injuries. The intrarater test-retest and interrater reliability of the FMS composite score resulted in an ICC3,1 of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.63-0.85) and an ICC2,1 of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.60-0.83) respectively. The SEM of the composite test was within 1 point and the MDC95 was 2.1 and 2.5 points on the 21 point scale for inter- and intrarater reliability, respectively. The interrater agreement of the component scores ranged from moderate to excellent (kw: 0.45 to 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Among novice raters, the FMS composite score demonstrated moderate to good interrater and intrarater reliability with acceptable levels of measurement error. The measures of reliability and measurement error were similar for both intrarater reliability that repeated the assessment of the movement patterns over a 48 to 72 hour period and interrater reliability that had 2 raters assess the same movement pattern simultaneously. The interrater agreement of the FMS component scores were good to excellent for the pushup, quadruped, shoulder mobility, straight leg raise, squat, hurdle, and lunge. Only 15.6% (n=10) of the participants were identified at-risk for injury based on previously published cut-off values.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 14 May 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3838
KEY WORDS: injury prediction, injury prevention, injury risk, interrater, intrarater
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Hiroshi Ishida, Sususmu Watanabe
STUDY DESIGN: Repeated measures. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to quantify the changes in the transverse abdominis (TrA), internal oblique (IO), and external oblique (EO) muscle thickness induced by different inward pressures of the transducer during ultrasound imaging (USI). BACKGROUND: USI of the lateral abdominal muscles is increasingly being used in the management of conditions involving musculoskeletal dysfunctions. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has evaluated the influence of different inward pressures of the transducer on the lateral abdominal muscle thickness during USI. METHODS: Thirty healthy male volunteers participated in this study. The thickness of the TrA, IO, and EO muscles were measured by USI in the following 4 conditions, where inward pressures of 0.5 N, 1.0 N, 2.0 N, and 4.0 N. A repeated measures ANOVA was utilized to determine the influence of inward pressure on thickness of the lateral abdominal muscles. RESULTS: The thickness of TrA, IO, and EO muscles were significantly different among the 4 conditions (P < 0.038). The mean differences between the 0.5-N and 4.0-N conditions were greater than the minimal detectable change of the 0.5-N condition in the lateral abdominal muscles. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in magnitude produced by the forces under different conditions was meaningful. When using a technique that involves a handheld transducer, the examiner should attempt to maintain consistent inward pressure of the transducer during USI to quantify the minimal change of lateral abdominal muscles.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 19 April 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.4064
KEY WORDS: muscle thickness, transverse abdominis, ultrasound imaging
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Kimberly A. Rupp, Daniel C. Herman, Jay Hertel, Susan A. Saliba
STUDY DESIGN: Crossover. OBJECTIVES: To compare the time required to decrease intramuscular temperature 8°C below baseline temperature, and compare intramuscular temperature 90 minutes post-treatment between two cryotherapy modalities. BACKGROUND: Cryotherapy is used to treat pain from muscle injuries. Cooler intramuscular temperatures may reduce cellular metabolism and secondary hypoxic injury to attenuate acute injury response, specifically the rate of chemical mediator activity. Modalities that decrease intramuscular temperature quickly may be beneficial in the treatment of muscle injuries. METHODS: 18 healthy subjects received 2 cryotherapy conditions: crushed ice bag (CIB) and cold water immersion (CWI) in a randomly allocated order separated by 72 hours, applied until intramuscular temperature decreased 8°C below baseline. Intramuscular temperature was monitored in the gastrocnemius 1cm below subcutaneous adipose tissue. The primary outcome was time to decrease intramuscular temperature 8°C below baseline. A secondary outcome was intramuscular temperature at the end of a 90 minute rewarming period. Paired t-tests were used to examine outcomes. RESULTS: Time to reach an 8°C reduction in intramuscular temperature was not significantly different between CIB and CWI (mean difference (95% CI) = 2.6 minutes (-3.10, 8.30)). Intramuscular temperature remained significantly colder 90 minutes post-cold water immersion compared to crushed ice bag (mean difference (95% CI) = 2.8°C (2.07, 3.52)). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in time required to reduce intramuscular temperature 8°C 1cm below adipose tissue using CIB and CWI. However, intramuscular temperature remained significantly colder 90 minutes following CWI. These results provide clinicians with information that may guide treatment modality decisions.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 23 March 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.4200
KEY WORDS: adipose tissue, cold water immersion, ice bag
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Dennis L. Hart, Paul W. Stratford, Mark W. Werneke, Daniel Deutscher, Ying-Chih Wang
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analyses of longitudinal, observational cohort data. OBJECTIVES: To compare discriminating ability and minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) calculated using functional status (FS) measures estimated from the Lumbar Computerized Adaptive Test (LCAT) and Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI). BACKGROUND: LCAT and ODI are commonly used to estimate FS in patients seeking outpatient therapy but have not been compared directly. METHODS: Data from 8,198 adults were analyzed from patients who completed LCAT and ODI at intake: 3,379 (41%) completed both surveys at discharge. Global ratings of change data were available from 980 patients. Discriminating ability of FS estimates from LCAT and ODI was estimated using Relative Validity (RV) calculated by dividing F values from LCAT and ODI ANCOVAs for important risk-adjustment variables. MCII was estimated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses by quartiles of intake FS values, and areas under the curves (AUC) were compared. RESULTS: RV ratios favored LCAT for age (3.7, 95% CI 2.0-8.9), acuity (1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6), comorbidities (1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.6), and surgical history (1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.9). MCII cut-scores per quartile favored LCAT. ROC AUCs were not different. CONCLUSIONS: FS measures estimated by both questionnaires had similar psychometric characteristics. The LCAT FS estimates tended to be more discriminating than ODI FS estimates. MCII cut-scores by quartile of intake FS favored the LCAT. Given the need to be efficient and precise estimating measures of FS, particularly for older patients, results favor the LCAT in busy, automated outpatient therapy clinics increasingly serving an aging population.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 19 April 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3942
KEY WORDS: computerized adaptive testing, lumbar spine, minimal clinically important difference, Oswestry, relative validity
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Ivan Mulligan, Mark Boland, Justin Payette
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective Cohort OBJECTIVES: To identify the prevalence of neurocognitive and balance deficits in collegiate football players 48 hours following competition. BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive testing, balance assessments, and subjective report of symptoms are a commonly used test battery in examining athletes when concussion is suspected. Previous literature suggests many concussions go unreported. Little research exists examining the prevalence of neurocognitive or balance deficits in athletes who do not report concussion-like symptoms to a health care provider. METHODS: Forty-five Division IA Collegiate football players participated in this study. Preseason baseline scores using the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT), and the Post Concussion Symptom Score were compared to posttest results obtained 48 hours following a game. Prevalence of symptoms were analyzed and reported. RESULTS: Thirty-Two of the 45 (71%) athletes tested demonstrated at least one deficit in either the Post Concussion Symptom Score, BESS, or at least one composite score of the ImPACT. Nineteen of the 32 subjects demonstrated a change in two or more categories of neurocognitive and balance function. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of subjects who were tested 48 hours following the last game of the season and did not seek medical attention related to a concussion, a significant number of football players demonstrated limitations in neurocognitive and balance performance suggesting further research needs to be performed to improve recognition of an athlete's deficits and improve the ability to assess concussion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 2b.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 24 April 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3798
KEY WORDS: BESS, ImPACT, test battery, traumatic brain injury
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Andrew D. Lynch, David S. Logerstedt, Michael J. Axe, Lynn Snyder-Mackler
STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationships between knee joint effusion, quadriceps activation, and quadriceps strength. These relationships may help clinicians better identify impaired quadriceps activation. BACKGROUND: After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, the involved quadriceps can demonstrate weakness. Experimental data have shown that quadriceps activation and strength may be directly mediated by intracapsular joint pressure created by saline injection. An inverse relationship between quadriceps activation and the amount of saline injected has been reported. This association has not been demonstrated for traumatic effusion. We hypothesized that traumatic joint effusion due to ACL rupture and post-injury quadriceps strength would correlate well with quadriceps activation, allowing clinicians to use effusion and strength measurement as a surrogate for electrophysiological assessment of quadriceps activation. METHODS: Prospective data were collected on 188 patients within 100 days of ACL injury (average 27 days) referred from a single surgeon. A complete clinical evaluation of the knee was performed including ligamentous assessment and assessment of range of motion and effusion. Quadriceps function was electrophysiologically assessed using maximum volitional isometric contraction and burst superimposition techniques to quantify both strength and activation. RESULTS: Effusion grade did not correlate with quadriceps central activation ratio (CAR) [Zero effusion: mean ± SD CAR = 93.5% ±5.8%; Trace effusion: CAR = 93.8% ±9.5%; 1+ effusion: CAR = 94.0% ±7.5%; 2+/3+ effusion: CAR = 90.6% ±11.1%]. These values are lower than normative data from healthy subjects (CAR = 98% ±3%). CONCLUSIONS: Joint effusion after ACL injury does not directly mediate quadriceps activation failure seen after injury. Therefore, it should not be used as a clinical substitute for electrophysiological assessment of quadriceps activation. Patients presenting to physical therapy after ACL injury should be treated with high intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation to help normalize this activation.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 20 April 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3793
KEY WORDS: ACL, effusion, electrophysiological assessment, swelling
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Gary Brooks, Michelle Dolphin, Patrick VanBeveren, Dennis L. Hart
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal cohort. OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical characteristics of patients with low back pain (LBP) according to physician referral source, and to identify associations between referral source and discharge functional status as well as number of physical therapy (PT) visits. BACKGROUND: Little is known about associations between physician referral source and outcomes of PT care for patients with LBP. Exploring these associations can contribute to better understanding of physician-PT relationships and may lead to improved referral patterns. METHODS: Data from a proprietary clinical database was examined retrospectively. Physician referral source was classified as primary care, specialist, or occupational medicine. Outcomes were overall health status (OHS) at discharge and number of PT visits. Descriptive statistics and bivariate associations between referral source and each outcome were assessed by calculating differences and 95% confidence intervals in means and proportions. In order to account for potential confounding, multi-level linear regression was used to adjust for baseline clinical covariates, and for effects related to clustering of patients treated by individual clinicians, and of clinicians working within individual clinics. RESULTS: Bivariate and multi-level analyses revealed significant associations between referral source and OHS and visits. Compared to specialist physician referral, referral from occupational medicine and primary care physicians was associated with higher discharge OHS scores and lower number of visits. CONCLUSIONS: After accounting for important clinical covariates and clustering, patients with LBP who were referred by occupational medicine and primary care physicians tended to have better functional outcomes and required fewer PT visits per episode of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis, level 2c.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 8 March 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3957
KEY WORDS: lumbar spine, physician referral, practice-based evidence
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Manuel Saavedra-Hernández, Adelaida M. Castro-Sánchez, Manuel Arroyo-Morales, Joshua A. Cleland, Inmaculada C. Lara-Palomo, César Fernández-de-las-Peñas
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of cervical spine thrust manipulation and Kinesiotaping® applied to the neck on self-reported pain and disability, and cervical range of motion in individuals with mechanical neck pain. BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of cervical manipulation has received considerable attention in the literature. However, because some patients cannot tolerate cervical thrust manipulations, alternative therapeutic options should be investigated. METHODS: Eighty patients (36 females) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: the manipulative group received 2 cervical thrust manipulations, whereas the tape group received Kinesiotaping® applied to the neck. Neck pain (11-point numeric pain rating scale), disability (Neck Disability Index), and cervical range of motion data were collected at baseline and 1 week after the intervention by an assessor blinded to the treatment allocation of the patients. Mixed-model ANOVAs were used to examine the effects of the treatment on each outcome variable with group as the between-subject variable and time as the within-subject variable. The primary analysis was the Group by Time interaction. RESULTS: No significant Group by Time interactions were found for pain (F=1.892; P=0.447) or disability (F=0.115; P=0.736). The Group by Time interaction was statistically significant for right (F = 7.317, P=0.008) and left (F=9.525, P=0.003) cervical rotation range of motion with the patients receiving the cervical thrust manipulation experiencing greater improvement in cervical rotation than those treated with Kinesiotape (P < 0.01). No significant Group by Time interactions were found for cervical spine range of motion for flexion (F=0.944; P= 0.334), extension (F=0.122; P=0.728), and right (F=0.220; P=0.650) and left (F=0.389, P= 0.535) lateral-flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mechanical neck pain receiving cervical thrust manipulation or treated with Kinesiotaping® exhibited similar reductions in neck pain intensity and disability and similar changes in active cervical range of motion except for rotation. Changes in neck pain surpassed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), whereas changes in disability did not. Changes in cervical range of motion were small and not clinically meaningful. Because we did not include a control or placebo group in this study, we cannot rule out placebo effect or natural changes over time as potential reasons for the improvements measured in both groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, Level 1b.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 20 April 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.4086
KEY WORDS: cervical spine, manual therapy, mobilization
View Abstract
View Full Article
Research Report
Theresa H. Nakagawa, Érika T. U. Moriya, Carlos D. Maciel, Fábio V. Serrão
STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study using a cross-sectional design. OBJECTIVES: To determine if there is any sex difference in trunk, pelvis, hip, and knee kinematics, hip strength, and gluteal muscle activation during the performance of a single leg squat in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) and controls. BACKGROUND: Although of greater incidence in females, PFPS is also quite common in males. Trunk kinematics have the potential to affect hip and knee function, however there is a lack of studies considering the influence of the trunk in individuals with PFPS. METHODS: Eighty subjects were distributed into 4 groups: females with PFPS, female controls, males with PFPS, and male controls. Trunk, pelvis, hip, and knee kinematics and gluteal muscle activation were evaluated during a single leg squat. Hip abduction and external rotation eccentric strength was measured on an isokinetic dynamometer. Group differences were assessed using 2-way MANOVA (sex x group). RESULTS: Compared to controls, subjects with PFPS had greater ipsilateral trunk lean (mean ±, SD, 9.3˚ ± 5.3˚ versus 6.7˚ ± 3.0˚, P=.012), contralateral pelvic drop (10.3˚ ± 4.7˚ versus 7.4˚ ± 3.8˚, P=.003), hip adduction (14.8˚ ± 7.8˚ versus 10.8˚ ± 5.6˚, P<.0001), and knee abduction (9.2˚ ± 5.0˚ versus 5.8˚ ± 3.4˚, P<.0001) when performing a single leg squat. Subjects with PFPS also had 18% less hip abduction and 17% less hip external rotation strength. Compared to the female controls, the females with PFPS had more hip internal rotation (P<.05) and less muscle activation of the gluteus medius (P=.017) during the single leg squat. CONCLUSION: Therefore, despite many similarities in findings for males and females with PFPS, there are some specific sex differences that may warrant consideration in future studies and clinically when evaluating and treating females with PFPS.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 8 March 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3987
KEY WORDS: anterior knee pain, biomechanics, electromyography, patella
View Abstract
View Full Article
HOMEMY JOSPTSUBSCRIBEABOUTCONTACTPRIVACY POLICYCOPYRIGHT NOTICE
© Copyright 2012 Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy










