SYNOPSIS: Frozen shoulder or adhesive capsulitis describes the common shoulder condition characterized by painful and limited active and passive range of motion. The etiology of frozen shoulder remains unclear; however, patients typically demonstrate a characteristic history, clinical presentation, and recovery. A classification schema is described, in which primary frozen shoulder and idiopathic adhesive capsulitis are considered identical and not associated with a systemic condition or history of injury. Secondary frozen shoulder is defined by 3 subcategories: systemic, extrinsic, and intrinsic. We also propose another classification system based on the patient’s irritability level (low, moderate, and high), that we believe is helpful when making clinical decisions regarding rehabilitation intervention. Nonoperative interventions include patient education, modalities, stretching exercises, joint mobilization, and corticosteroid injections. Glenohumeral intra-articular corticosteroid injections, exercise, and joint mobilization all result in improved short- and long-term outcomes. However, there is strong evidence that glenohumeral intra-articular corticosteroid injections have a significantly greater 4- to 6-week beneficial effect compared to other forms of treatment. A rehabilitation model based on evidence and intervention strategies matched with irritability levels is proposed. Exercise and manual techniques are progressed as the patient’s irritability reduces. Response to treatment is based on significant pain relief, improved satisfaction, and return of functional motion. Patients who do not respond or worsen should be referred for an intra-articular corticosteroid injection. Patients who have recalcitrant symptoms and disabling pain may respond to either standard or translational manipulation under anesthesia or arthroscopic release. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(2):135-148. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2916

KEY WORDS: adhesive capsulitis, corticosteroid injection, glenohumeral joint, joint mobilization

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. BACKGROUND: Spinal accessory nerve palsy (SANP) is common following neck dissection surgery and can occur with blunt or penetrating trauma to the lateral neck region and cervical stretch injuries. Early detection of SANP remains a clinical challenge and the condition is often misdiagnosed. The purpose of this case series is to describe the associated history, signs, and symptoms related to SANP and increase awareness of the scapular flip sign as a clinical sign associated with SANP. CASE SERIES DESCRIPTION: Twenty subjects (13 male, 7 female) presented with pain and decreased shoulder function following head and neck surgery or posttrauma. All patients were thoroughly examined and the scapular flip sign was assessed. All patients presented with a cluster of signs and symptoms including trapezius atrophy, shoulder girdle depression, limited active shoulder abduction to less than 90°, shoulder pain, and shoulder weakness. A positive scapular flip sign was present in all cases. The middle and lower trapezius were rated as 0/5, based on manual muscle testing, indicating no identifiable muscle activation against resistance. DISCUSSION: A typical history and consistent signs and symptoms were found related to SANP. A strong relationship appeared between the presence of the scapular flip sign and SANP. The suspected mechanism for the scapular flip sign is the unopposed pull of the humeral external rotators by the inactive middle and lower trapezius. Early identification of SANP can assist with the prognosis, explain persistent impairments and functional deficits, motivate appropriate diagnostic testing and interventions, and help maximize outcome. Further research to validate the scapular flip sign and establish a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of SANP should be performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnosis, Level 4.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(2):78-86, published online 7 September 2007. doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2454

KEY WORDS: examination, neck, shoulder, trapezius

Study Design: Psychometric evaluation of a cross-sectional survey. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of reliability and validity of the Penn Shoulder Score (PSS). Background: Shoulder outcome measures are used to assess patient self-report levels of pain, satisfaction, and function. The PSS is a 100-point shoulder-specific self-report questionnaire consisting of 3 subscales of pain, satisfaction, and function. This scale has been utilized in the literature. However, the measurement properties of reliability and validity, including responsiveness, of the PSS subscales and overall scale need to be established. Methods and Measures: Patients (n = 40) with shoulder disorders undergoing a course of outpatient physical therapy completed the PSS at initial visit and again within 72 hours to assess test-retest reliability. The Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES) were also completed at the initial visit and compared to the PSS to assess convergent construct validity. A separate cohort of patients (n = 109) completed the PSS at initial visit and 4 weeks later. These scores were used to assess internal consistency and responsiveness. Results: Reliability analysis revealed a test-retest ICC _2,1 of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97). Internal consistency analysis revealed a Cronbach alpha of 0.93. The standard error of measurement (SEM) was ± 8.5 scale points (based on a 90% CI) and the minimal detectable change (MDC) was ± 12.1 scale points (based on a 90% CI). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for improvement was 11.4 points. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients between the PSS and the CSS and ASES were 0.85 and 0.87, respectively. Responsiveness analysis revealed an effect size of 1.01 and a standardized response mean of 1.27. Conclusions: This study has demonstrated that the PSS is a reliable and valid measure for reporting outcome of patients with various shoulder disorders.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(3):138-151. doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2090

Key Words: outcome assessment, psychometrics, reliability, validity