<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Cynthia A. Trowbridge, PhD, ATC, CSCS]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/cynthiaatrowbridge</link>
<description></description>
<language></language>
<copyright></copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs></docs>
<generator></generator>
<managingEditor></managingEditor>
<webMaster></webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Paraspinal Musculature and Skin Temperature Changes: Comparing the ThermaCare HeatWrap, the Johnson &amp; Johnson Back Plaster, and the ABC Warme-Pflaster</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.305/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.cynthiaatrowbridge/author.asp">Cynthia A. Trowbridge</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidodraper/author.asp">David O. Draper</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jbrentfeland/author.asp">J. Brent Feland</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.lisasjutte/author.asp">Lisa S. Jutte</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.dennisleggett/author.asp">Dennis L. Eggett</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> Prospective, randomized, crossover design. <strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of the Johnson &amp; Johnson Back Plaster, the ABC Warme-Pflaster, and the ThermaCare HeatWrap on skin and paraspinal muscle temperature. Also, to compare the subjects&rsquo; heat perception for the 3 products. <strong>Background:</strong> Heat therapy is a common treatment for low back pain and disability. There are a number of products on the market that are suggested to relieve low back pain by providing warmth to the back; however, their effectiveness for increasing tissue temperature compared with heat sensation has not been tested. <strong>Methods and Measures: </strong>To measure paraspinal muscle temperature, 1 thermocouple monofilament was inserted into the paraspinal muscle 2 cm from the skin surface at the L3 level using a 20-gauge 1.25-in (3.15-cm) sterile catheter. To measure skin interface temperature, 2 thermocouples were placed on the skin at distances of 5 cm and 7 cm from the insertion site. The Isothermex was used to record temperatures to the nearest 0.1&deg;C for 120 minutes. The subjects also rated heat perception using a 10-cm visual analog scale at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. Analysis of covariance models was used for statistical analysis. <strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant product &times; time interaction (F<sub>14,231</sub> = 3.77, P&lt;.0001) at the intramuscular site, but there was not a significant product &times; time interaction (F<sub>14,231</sub> = 1.03, P = .4228) at the skin site. Both the main effects for product (F<sub>2,33</sub> = 41.59, P&lt;.0001) and time (F<sub>3,51</sub> = 19.02, P&lt;.0001) were significant for the visual analog scale data. The ThermaCare HeatWrap produced significant increases in both skin and intramuscular temperatures with less heat sensation. The Johnson &amp; Johnson Back Plaster and the ABC Warme-Pflaster increased temperature at the skin surface and provided the greatest heat sensations, but they did not provide intramuscular heat. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ThermaCare HeatWrap is more effective at increasing temperature at a 2-cm depth with less perceived heat compared to the Johnson &amp; Johnson Back Plaster and the ABC Warme-Pflaster. The latter 2 products provide a sensation of heat but do not actually provide a muscle temperature change at a depth of 2 cm. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(9):549-558.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.1168</p><p><strong>Key Words: </strong>heat, low back, physical agents, temperature</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.305/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>
