<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Capt David A. Browder, DPT, MS, OCS]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/davidabrowder</link>
<description></description>
<language></language>
<copyright></copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs></docs>
<generator></generator>
<managingEditor></managingEditor>
<webMaster></webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Flexural Wave Propagation Velocity and Bone Mineral Density in Females With and Without Tibial Bone Stress Injuries</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.369/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.ryantgirrbach/author.asp">Ryan T. Girrbach</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.timothywflynn/author.asp">Timothy W. Flynn</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidabrowder/author.asp">Capt David A. Browder</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.karlenelguffie/author.asp">Karlene L. Guffie</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.josefhmoore/author.asp">Josef H. Moore</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.lawrencenmasullo/author.asp">Lawrence N. Masullo</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.anthonycbare/author.asp">Anthony C. Bare</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.yongbradley/author.asp">Yong Bradley</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design: </strong>Case-control nonexperimental design. <strong>Objectives:</strong> To compare flexural wave propagation velocity (FWPV) and tibial bone mineral density (BMD) in women with and without tibial bone stress injuries (BSls). <strong>Background: </strong>Physical therapists, particularly in military and sports medicine settings, routinely diagnose and manage stress fractures or bone stress injuries. Improved methods of preparticipation quantification of tibial strength may provide markers of BSI risk and thus potentially reduce morbidity. <strong>Methods and Measures: </strong>Bone mineral density, FWPV, bone geometry, and historical variables were collected from 14 subjects diagnosed with tibial BSls and 14 age-matched controls; all 28 were undergoing military training. <strong>Results: </strong>No difference was found between groups in FWPV and tibial BMD when analyzed with t tests (post hoc power = 0.89 and 0.81, respectively). Furthermore, no difference was found in tibial length, tibial width, femoral neck BMD, and lumbar spine BMD among the groups. There were no differences between the 2 groups in smoking history, birth control pill use, and onset of menarche. Finally, sensitivity and positive likelihood ratios for FWPV (0.14 and 0.63), tibial BMD (0.0 and 0.0), and lumbar BMD (0.18 and 2.0) were low, while specificity was high (0.77, 0.93, and 0.91, respectively). <strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current bone analysis devices and methods may not be sensitive enough to detect differences in tibial material and structure; local stresses on bone may be more important in the development of BSls than the overall structural stiffness. </p><p>J Orthop Spots Phys Ther. 2001;31(2):54-69. </p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> bone stiffness, overuse injuries, risk factors, stress fractures</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.369/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Intermittent Cervical Traction and Thoracic Manipulation for Management of Mild Cervical Compressive Myelopathy Attributed to Cervical Herniated Disc: A Case Series</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.396/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidabrowder/author.asp">Capt David A. Browder</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.richardeerhard/author.asp">Richard E. Erhard</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.sararpiva/author.asp">Sara R. Piva</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design: </strong>Case series. <strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the management of 7 patients with grade 1 cervical compressive myelopathy attributed to herniated disc using intermittent cervical traction and manipulation of the thoracic spine. <strong>Background:</strong> Intermittent cervical traction has been indicated for the treatment of patients with herniated disc and has been suggested to be helpful for patients with cervical compressive myelopathy. Manipulation of the thoracic spine has been utilized to safely improve active range of motion and decrease pain in patients with neck pain. <strong>Methods and Measures: </strong>Seven women with neck pain, 35 to 45 years of age, were identified as having signs and symptoms consistent with grade 1 cervical compressive myelopathy. Symptom duration ranged from less than 1 week to 52 weeks. All patients were treated with intermittent cervical traction and thoracic manipulation for a median of 9 sessions (range, 2-12 sessions) over a median of 56 days (range, 14-146 days). Numeric Pain Rating Scale and Functional Rating Index scores served as the primary outcome measures. <strong>Results:</strong> The median decrease in pain scores was 5 (range, 2-8) from a baseline of 6 (range, 4-8), and median improvement in Functional Rating Index scores was 26% (range, 10%-50%) from a baseline of 44% (range, 35%-71%). Dizziness was eliminated in 3 out of 4 patients and chronic headache symptoms were improved in 3 out of 3 patients. There were no adverse events or outcomes. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intermittent cervical traction and manipulation of the thoracic spine seem useful for the reduction of pain scores and level of disability in patients with mild cervical compressive myelopathy attributed to herniated disc. A thorough neurological screening exam is recommended prior to mechanical treatment of the cervical spine. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(11):701-712. doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.1519</p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> conservative, Hoffmann&rsquo;s reflex, mechanical traction, spinal cord impingement, upper motor neuron</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.396/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Decision Making for a Painful Hip: A Case Requiring Referral</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.821/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidabrowder/author.asp">Capt David A. Browder</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.richardeerhard/author.asp">Richard E. Erhard</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design: </strong>Resident&#39;s case problem. <strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this resident&#39;s case problem is to describe a 39-year-old female patient with insidious onset of hip pain. This patient had discrete findings on subjective and physical examination that prompted referral for further imaging studies of the left hip and pelvis. Despite having seen multiple providers, no imaging of the involved hip or pelvis had been performed. A prolonged duration of symptoms, severe gait disturbance with an associated Trendelenburg sign, difficulty sleeping, and an empty end feel with passive range of motion increased concern that a pathological process might be present. <strong>Diagnosis:</strong> Imaging studies revealed a large destructive soft-tissue tumor later found to be non-Hodgkin&#39;s lymphoma. <strong>Discussion: </strong>It is incumbent upon physical therapists to be aware of the potential for severe pathological conditions that mimic musculoskeletal complaints to exist and understand how to identify patients for whom further testing and/or referral may be appropriate. Existing guidelines for low back pain may assist with decision making in the absence of specific guidelines for when to request imaging in patients with nontraumatic hip and pelvis pain. Proficiency in screening for conditions not amenable to physical therapy treatment or that require consultation to other health care professionals is essential to physical therapy practice. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(11):738-744.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2005.2064</p><p><strong>Key Words: </strong>cancer, pelvis, physical therapy, radiology, screening</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.821/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>
