<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - David G. Greathouse, PT, PhD, ECS]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/davidggreathouse</link>
<description></description>
<language></language>
<copyright></copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs></docs>
<generator></generator>
<managingEditor></managingEditor>
<webMaster></webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Practice Analysis: Defining the Clinical Practice of Primary Contact Physical Therapy</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.278/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.edsenbdonato/author.asp">Edsen B. Donato</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.roberteduvall/author.asp">Robert E. DuVall</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.josephjgodges/author.asp">Joseph J. Godges</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.grenithjzimmerman/author.asp">Grenith J. Zimmerman</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidggreathouse/author.asp">David G. Greathouse</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> Nonexperimental descriptive research design. <strong>Objective:</strong> To describe the frequency of use and perceived level of importance of professional responsibilities, procedures, and knowledge areas by physical therapists practicing in primary contact care settings and to compare these data to similar data from physical therapists practicing in nonprimary contact care settings. <strong>Background:</strong> Physical therapy services have moved toward a primary contact model of practice in response to changes in the health care delivery system. Several studies have reported the effectiveness of primary contact physical therapy. However, a practice analysis has not been performed to define the clinical practice of primary contact physical therapy. <strong>Methods and Measures: </strong>A sample of 212 physical therapists practicing as primary contact providers in the military and civilian sectors, and a comparison group of 250 physical therapists not practicing as primary contact providers were surveyed. A Delphi technique was used to develop the survey instrument, which was pretested by a pilot group. The final survey instrument consisted of 171 items. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted to examine significant differences among the 3 groups (P&lt;.001). <strong>Results: </strong>Of the 212 surveys mailed to the primary contact group, 119 (56.1%) responses were received (82 military physical therapists and 37 civilian physical therapists). Of the 250 surveys mailed to the comparison group, 103 (41.2%) responses were received. There were numerous significant differences among the 3 groups in professional responsibilities, procedures, and knowledge areas, most notably in the areas of selecting and ordering of imaging procedures, identifying signs and symptoms of nonmusculoskeletal conditions, establishing physical therapy diagnoses, and prescribing over-the-counter medications. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study describes the clinical practice of physical therapists functioning in the role of primary contact providers or as members of a diverse team of health care professionals in primary care, which may provide curricular direction to professional, postprofessional, and clinical residency or fellowship-based educational settings. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(6):284-304.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.1298<br /><br /><strong>Key Words: </strong>clinical competencies, physical therapists, primary care<br /></p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.278/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Terminologia Anatomica: Revised Anatomical Terminology</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.287/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidggreathouse/author.asp">David G. Greathouse</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.johnshalle/author.asp">John S. Halle</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.arthurfdalleyii/author.asp">Arthur F. Dalley II</a><br /><p>The purposes of this editorial are to acquaint the physical therapy profession and readers of the <em>JOSPT </em>with an abridged and focused summary of the new anatomical terminology currently being used in health education, scholarly publication, research, and practice, and to provide a rationale for the implemented changes. The current anatomical terms are being utilized in the education and training of students of physical therapy, medicine, and other allied health programs, and are being integrated into clinical practice. Acceptance and adherence to the new standard will enable clear understanding and increase the accuracy of documentation, and improve communication among health care professionals who will all be speaking the same language.</p><p><em>J Orthop Phys Ther. 2004; 34(7):363-367.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.0107</p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> anatomical terminology</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.287/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Effect of Fluidotherapy on Superficial Radial Nerve Conduction and Skin Temperature</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.481/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.ryankelly/author.asp">Ryan Kelly</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.chrisbeehn/author.asp">Chris Beehn</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.ashleyhansford/author.asp">Ashley Hansford</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kathleenawestphal/author.asp">Kathleen A. Westphal</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.johnshalle/author.asp">John S. Halle</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidggreathouse/author.asp">David G. Greathouse</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study. <strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the superficial heating modality, Fluidotherapy, on skin temperature and on sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) conduction latency and amplitude of the superficial radial nerve in healthy individuals. <strong>Background: </strong>Fluidotherapy is a dry, superficial heating modality, which also provides tactile stimulation through the bombardment of air-fluidized cellulose particles. Previous literature has documented a direct relationship between skin temperature and neural conduction velocity; however, there is an absence of published research examining the effects of Fluidotherapy, and of tactile stimulation specifically, on neural conduction. <strong>Methods and Measures:</strong> Twenty-one subjects between the ages of 22 and 31 years (mean &plusmn; SD, 25.5 &plusmn; 0.7 years) and without prior history of diabetes, alcoholism, renal or metabolic dysfunction, current pregnancy, or heat sensitivity were invited to participate. Subjects completed an upper quarter screening exam and medical history form prior to participation. One group underwent heat (46.7&deg;C-48.9&deg;C) and tactile stimulation, a second group underwent tactile stimulation alone, while a third served as controls. Dependent variables were assessed at 3 intervals: before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 20 minutes after the intervention. All interventions were 20 minutes in length. <strong>Results: </strong>A mixed 2-way analysis of variance indicated a significant interaction between time of neural conduction velocity assessment and treatment group for the dependent variables of sensory nerve action potential latency (P&lt;.001) and skin temperature (P&lt;.001). Appropriate post hoc tests were performed for simple effect comparisons. An inverse linear relationship existed between skin temperature and latency (r<sup>2</sup> = .65; Pearson product coefficient, &ndash;.81). <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Fluidotherapy treatment, which combines the effects of heat and tactile stimulation, significantly elevated superficial skin temperature, while tactile stimulation alone and no treatment (control group) did not bring about a temperature change. As the superficial skin temperature increased, there was a concomitant decrease in the distal sensory latency of the superficial radial sensory nerve action potential. These results should be an important consideration for the clinician using superficial heating modalities. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2005;35(1)16-23.</em> doi: 10.2519/jospt.2005.1138</p><p><strong>Key Words: </strong>heat, latency, neural conduction, physical agents</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.481/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Primary Care Physical Therapy Practice Models</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.817/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.brianpmurphy/author.asp">Brian P. Murphy</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidggreathouse/author.asp">David G. Greathouse</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.ivanmatsui/author.asp">Ivan Matsui</a><br /><p><strong>The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief background </strong>on the concept of primary care physical therapy, describe 3 existing models of primary care physical therapy, explore their similarities and differences, and discuss the potential implications and opportunities for the profession. The programs at US Army medical facilities, Kaiser Permanente Northern California and the Department of Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, are presented by the author affiliated with each respective program. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(11):699-707.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2005.2167</p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> differential diagnosis, direct access, health policy</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.817/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Electrotherapeutic Terminology in Physical Therapy</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.914/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidggreathouse/author.asp">David G. Greathouse</a><br />&nbsp;]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.914/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Median and Ulnar Neuropathies in University Guitarists</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1017/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.rachelhkennedy/author.asp">Rachel H. Kennedy</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kimberlyjhutcherson/author.asp">Kimberly J. Hutcherson</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jenniferbkain/author.asp">Jennifer B. Kain</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.alicialphillips/author.asp">Alicia L. Phillips</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.johnshalle/author.asp">John S. Halle</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidggreathouse/author.asp">David G. Greathouse</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design: </strong>Descriptive study.&nbsp;<strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the presence of median and ulnar neuropathies in both upper extremities of university guitarists. <strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral nerve entrapment syndromes of the upper extremities are well documented in musicians. Guitarists and plucked-string musicians are at risk for entrapment neuropathies in the upper extremities and are prone to mild neurologic deficits. <strong>Methods and Measures: </strong>Twenty-four volunteer male and female guitarists (age range, 18-26 years) were recruited from the Belmont University School of Music and the Vanderbilt University Blair School of Music. Individuals were excluded if they were pregnant or had a history of recent upper extremity or neck injury. Subjects completed a history form, were interviewed, and underwent a physical examination. Nerve conduction status of the median and ulnar nerves of both upper extremities was obtained by performing motor, sensory, and F-wave (central) nerve conduction studies. Descriptive statistics of the nerve conduction study variables were computed using Microsoft Excel. <strong>Results: </strong>Six subjects had positive findings on provocative testing of the median and ulnar nerves. Otherwise, these guitarists had normal upper extremity neural and musculoskeletal function based on the history and physical examinations. When comparing the subjects&rsquo; nerve conduction study values with a chart of normal nerve conduction studies values, 2 subjects had prolonged distal motor latencies (DMLs) of the left median nerve of 4.3 and 4.7 milliseconds (normal, &lt;4.2 milliseconds). Prolonged DMLs are compatible with median neuropathy at or distal to the wrist. Otherwise, all electrophysiological variables were within normal limits for motor, sensory, and F-wave (central) values. However, comparison studies of median and ulnar motor latencies in the same hand demonstrated prolonged differences of greater than 1.0 milliseconds that affected the median nerve in 2 additional subjects, and identified contralateral limb involvement in a subject with a prolonged distal latency. The other 20 subjects demonstrated normal comparison studies of the median and ulnar nerves in both upper extremities. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this descriptive study of a population of 24 university guitarists, 4 musicians (17%) were found to have electrophysiologic evidence of median neuropathy at or distal to the wrist or carpal tunnel syndrome. Ulnar nerve electrophysiological function was within normal limits for all subjects examined. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(2):101-111.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2155</p><p><strong>Key Words: </strong>median nerve, nerve conduction study, ulnar nerve </p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1017/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>The United States Army Physical Therapy Experience: Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Neuromusculoskeletal Disorders</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1074/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidggreathouse/author.asp">David G. Greathouse</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.richardcschreck/author.asp">Richard C. Schreck</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.cindyjbenson/author.asp">LtCol Cindy J. Benson</a><br /><p>The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department bf the Army or the Department of Defense.  Army physical therapists have had unique experiences relevant to orthopaedic physical therapy. The educational process, expanded clinical privileges, and physician supervisor role as developed to prepare and support physical therapists working as primary neuromusculoskeletal screeners are summarized. After-action reports demonstrate that Army physical therapists can evaluate and treat one-third of all sick-call patients generated in field training missions and significantly improve return-to-duty rates without requiring physician intervention.  The historic events that led to the physician-extender role in the evaluation and treatment of patients with neuromusculoskeletal conditions are presented. These events support the current battlefield assignment of physical therapists as far forward as the inflatable Combat Support Hospitals. The scope of Army physical therapy practice continues to evolve and expand to meet the new challenge of nation assistance, peacekeeping, and humanitarian missions. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;19(5):261-266.  </p><p>Key Words: physical therapy, orthopaedics, neuromusculoskeletal</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1074/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>
