Study Design: Nonexperimental, retrospective design. Objectives: This study was designed to compare clinical diagnostic accuracy (CDA) between physical therapists (PTs), orthopaedic surgeons (OSs), and nonorthopaedic providers (NOPs) at Keller Army Community Hospital on patients with musculoskeletal injuries (MSI) referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Background: US Army PTs are frequently the first credentialed providers privileged to examine and diagnose patients with musculoskeletal injuries. Physical therapists assigned at Keller Army Community Hospital have also been credentialed with privileges to order MRI studies for several years. Methods and Measures: To reduce provider bias, a retrospective analysis was performed on 560 patients referred for MRI over an 18-month period. An electronic review of each patient’s radiological profile was performed to assess agreement between clinical diagnosis and MRI findings. Data analyses were performed through descriptive statistics and contingency tables. Results:Analysis on agreement between clinical diagnosis and MRI findings produced a CDA of 74.5% (108/145) for PTs, 80.8% (139/172) for OSs, and 35.4% (86/243) for NOPs. There was a significant difference in CDA between PTs and NOPs (P<.001), and between OSs and NOPs (P<.001). There was no difference in CDA between PTs and OSs (P>.05). Conclusions: Clinical diagnostic accuracy by PTs and OSs on patients with musculoskeletal injuries was significantly greater than for NOPs, with no difference noted between PTs and OSs.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(2):67-71. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2005.1344

Key Words: diagnostic agreement, direct access, primary care

The dynamic muscle stabilizers of the shoulder are critical to high performance in the overhead athlete. Previous evaluations of shoulder strength have focused on the concentric strength of the rotator cuff. Functionally, the rotator cuff muscles interact in an eccentric/concentric fashion. This is the first study to evaluate the end range eccentric antagonist/concentric agonist ratios of the shoulder rotators. Seventy-five asymptomatic college-level males were tested through a range of 20° of lateral rotation to 90° of medial rotation using the Kin-Com computer-assisted, hydraulic-resisted, isokinetic dynamometer at a speed of 90°/sec. The end range (60-90°) ratios for the medial rotators functioning eccentrically and lateral rotators functioning concentrically were 2.39:1 and 2.15:1 for the dominant and nondominant shoulders, respectively. End range (10° of lateral rotation-20° of medial rotation) ratios for lateral rotators functioning eccentrically and medial rotators functioning concentrically were 1.08:1 and 1.05:1 for the dominant and nondominant shoulders, respectively. The application of this functional assessment of strength testing results may provide important information in the evaluation of the injured shoulder in the overhead athlete, for prescreening, and to gauge return to sports after injury or surgery.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;25(3):203-207.

Key Words: shoulder, muscle, dynamic strength