<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - E. Lyle Cain, MD]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/elylecain</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://feedvalidator.org/docs/rss2.html</docs>
<generator>www.eResources.com (Generator)</generator>
<managingEditor>jospt@eresources.com (JOSPT)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jospt@eresources.com (eResources)</webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.asp" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Shoulder Injuries in the Overhead Athlete</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2293/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.padraicobma/author.asp">Padraic Obma</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.charlesdsimpson/author.asp">Charles D. Simpson</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.elylecain/author.asp">E. Lyle Cain</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffreyrdugas/author.asp">Jeffrey R. Dugas</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p><strong><font color="#999900">SYNOPSIS:</font></strong> The overhead throwing motion is an extremely skillful and intricate movement. When pitching, the overhead throwing athlete places extraordinary demands on the shoulder complex subsequent to the tremendous forces that are generated. The thrower&rsquo;s shoulder must be lax enough to allow excessive external rotation but stable enough to prevent symptomatic humeral head subluxations, thus requiring a delicate balance between mobility and functional stability. We refer to this as the &quot;thrower&rsquo;s paradox.&quot; This balance is frequently compromised and believed to lead to various types of injuries to the surrounding tissues. Frequently, injuries can be successfully treated with a well-structured and carefully implemented nonoperative rehabilitation program. The key to successful nonoperative treatment is a thorough clinical examination and accurate diagnosis. Rehabilitation follows a structured, multiphase approach, with emphasis on controlling inflammation, restoring muscles&rsquo; balance, improving soft tissue flexibility, enhancing proprioception and neuromuscular control, and efficiently returning the athlete to competitive throwing. Athletes often exhibit numerous adaptive changes that develop from the repetitive microtraumatic stresses occurring during overhead throwing. Treatment should include the restoration of these adaptations. <strong><font color="#999900">LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:</font></strong> Level 5. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(2):38-54. doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.2929</em> </p><p><strong><font color="#999900">KEYWORDS:</font></strong> baseball, glenohumeral joint, labral lesions, pitching, rotator cuff</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2293/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Current Concepts in the Rehabilitation Following Articular Cartilage Repair Procedures in the Knee</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1172/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaelmreinold/author.asp">Michael M. Reinold</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.leonardcmacrina/author.asp">Leonard C. Macrina</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.elylecain/author.asp">E. Lyle Cain</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffreyrdugas/author.asp">Jeffrey R. Dugas</a><br /><p><strong>Postoperative rehabilitation programs</strong> following articular cartilage repair procedures will vary greatly among patients and need to be individualized based on the nature of the lesion, the unique characteristics of the patient, and the type and detail of each surgical procedure. These programs are based on knowledge of the basic science, anatomy, and biomechanics of articular cartilage as well as the biological course of healing following surgery. The goal is to restore full function in each patient as quickly as possible by facilitating a healing response without overloading the healing articular cartilage. </p><p><strong>The purpose of this paper</strong> is to overview the principles of rehabilitation following articular cartilage repair procedures. Furthermore, specific rehabilitation guidelines for debridement, abrasion chondroplasty, microfracture, osteochondral autograft transplantation, and autologous chondrocyte implantation will be presented based upon our current understanding of the biological healing response postoperatively. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(10):774-794.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2228</p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> autologous chondrocyte implantation, chondroplasty, microfracture, osteochondral autograft transplantation</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1172/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>

