<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/frederickprivara</link>
<description></description>
<language></language>
<copyright></copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs></docs>
<generator></generator>
<managingEditor></managingEditor>
<webMaster></webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Quadriceps Angle and Risk of Injury Among High School Cross-Country Runners</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1332/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.mitchelljrauh/author.asp">Mitchell J. Rauh</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.thomasdkoepsell/author.asp">Thomas D. Koepsell</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.frederickprivara/author.asp">Frederick P. Rivara</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.stephengrice/author.asp">Stephen G. Rice</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.anthonyjmargherita/author.asp">Anthony J. Margherita</a><br /><strong><font color="#000099">DESIGN:</font></strong>&nbsp;Prospective cohort study. <strong><font color="#000099">OBJECTIVES:</font> </strong>To determine the relationship between quadriceps angle (Q-angle) and risk of lower extremity injury among adolescent cross-country runners. <strong><font color="#000099">BACKGROUND:</font></strong> No consensus exists on the role of the Q-angle as a risk factor for lower-extremity overuse injury, especially the effect of large Q-angle or right-left Q-angle difference. <strong><font color="#000099">METHODS AND MEASURES:</font></strong>&nbsp;The Q-angles of 393 high school cross-country runners, 13 to 19 years of age, were goniometrically measured in a static, standing position with quadriceps relaxed. The runners were followed during a cross-country season to assess lower extremity injuries resulting from running in practices or competitions. <strong><font color="#000099">RESULTS:</font></strong>&nbsp;Runners with a Q-angle <u>&gt;</u>20&deg; were at 1.7 times greater risk of injury (relative risk [RR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2, 2.4) compared with runners whose Q-angle was 10&deg; to &lt;15&deg;. The RR estimates were similar among girls and boys. Runners with <u>&gt;</u>4&deg; absolute right-left Q-angle difference were at 1.8 times greater risk (RR, 1.8; 95% CI: 1.4, 2.5) compared to runners with a smaller difference. Runners with a Q-angle <u>&gt;</u>20&deg; were more likely to injure their knee, while runners with <u>&gt;</u>4&deg; Q-angle difference were more likely to injure their shin. Runners with a Q-angle <u>&gt;</u>20&deg; had greater time lost due to injury. <strong><font color="#000099">CONCLUSIONS:</font></strong>&nbsp;High school cross-country runners with large or asymmetric Q-angles may be at greater risk for running injury.&nbsp;Our study suggests that Q-angle measurement be included in preseason screening exams. <p align="left"><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007;37(12):725-733,&nbsp;published online&nbsp;29 August 2007. doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2453</em></p><strong><font color="#000099">KEY WORDS:</font>&nbsp; </strong>asymmetry, athletic injuries, prospective cohort, Q-angle, running injuries]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1332/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>
