<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Gary A. Dudley, PhD]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/garyadudley</link>
<description></description>
<language></language>
<copyright></copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs></docs>
<generator></generator>
<managingEditor></managingEditor>
<webMaster></webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>The Role of Pulse Duration and Stimulation Duration in Maximizing the Normalized Torque During Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1413/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.ashrafsgorgey/author.asp">Ashraf S. Gorgey</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.garyadudley/author.asp">Gary A. Dudley</a><br /><p><strong><font color="#000099">STUDY DESIGN:</font></strong>&nbsp;Controlled laboratory study <strong><font color="#000099">OBJECTIVES:</font>&nbsp;</strong>To determine the effects of pulse duration and stimulation duration on the evoked torque after controlling for the activated area by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). <strong><font color="#000099">BACKGROUND:</font>&nbsp;</strong>Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is commonly used in the clinic without considering the physiological implications of its parameters.&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">METHODS AND MEASURES:</font></strong>&nbsp;Seven able-bodied, college students (mean &plusmn; SD age, 28 &plusmn; 4 years) participated in this study.&nbsp;Two NMES protocols were applied to the knee extensor muscle group in a random order. Protocol A&nbsp;applied 100-Hz, 450-microsecond pulses for 5 minutes in a 3-seconds-on 3-seconds-off duty cycle. Protocol B&nbsp;applied 60-Hz, 250-microsecond pulses for 5 minutes in a 10-seconds-on 20-seconds-off duty cycle. The amplitude of the current was similar in both protocols. Torque, torque time integral, and normalized torque for the knee extensors were measured for both protocols.<strong> </strong>MRI scans were taken prior to, and immediately&nbsp;after, each protocol to measure the cross-sectional area of the stimulated muscle.&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">RESULTS:</font></strong> The skeletal muscle&nbsp;cross-sectional areas&nbsp;activated after both protocols were similar. The longer pulse duration in protocol A elicited 22% greater torque output than that of&nbsp;protocol B (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). After considering the activated area in both protocols, the normalized torque with protocol A was 38% greater than that with protocol B (<em>P</em>&lt;.05).&nbsp;Torque time integral was 21% greater with protocol A (<em>P</em> = .029). Protocol B failed to maintain torque at the start and the end of the 10-second activation. <strong><font color="#000099">CONCLUSIONS: </font></strong>Longer pulse duration, but not stimulation duration, resulted in a greater evoked and normalized torque compared to the shorter pulse duration, even after controlling for the activated muscular&nbsp;cross-sectional areas&nbsp;with both protocols. <strong><font color="#000099">LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:</font></strong> Therapy, level 5.</p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(8):508-516, published online 25 April 2008. doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2734</em>&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><strong><font color="#000099">KEY WORDS:</font></strong> electrotherapy, MRI, NMES, quadriceps</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1413/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>
