STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To test for kinematic and kinetic differences between baseball pitching from a mound and long-toss on flat ground. BACKGROUND: Long-toss throws from flat ground are commonly used by baseball pitchers for rehabilitation, conditioning, and training. However, there is controversy over the biomechanics and functionality of such throws. METHODS: Seventeen healthy, college baseball pitchers pitched fastballs 18.4 m from a mound to a strike zone, and threw 37 m, 55 m, and maximum distance from flat ground. For the 37-m and 55-m throws, participants were instructed to throw “hard, on a horizontal line.” For the maximum-distance throw, no constraint on trajectory was given. Kinematics and kinetics were measured with a 3-dimensional, automated motion analysis system. Repeated-measures analyses of variance, with post hoc paired t tests, were used to compare the 4 throw types within pitchers. RESULTS: At foot contact, the participant’s shoulder line was nearly horizontal when pitching from a mound and became progressively more inclined as throwing distance increased. At arm cocking, the greatest amount of shoulder external rotation (mean ± SD, 180° ± 11°), elbow flexion (109° ± 10°), shoulder internal rotation torque (101 ± 17 Nm), and elbow varus torque (100 ± 18 Nm) were measured during the maximum-distance throws. Elbow extension velocity was also greatest for the maximum-distance throws (2573°/s ± 203°/s). Forward trunk tilt at the instant of ball release decreased as throwing distance increased. CONCLUSION: Hard, horizontal, flat-ground throws have biomechanical patterns similar to those of pitching and are, therefore, reasonable exercises for pitchers. However, maximum-distance throws produce increased torques and changes in kinematics. Caution is, therefore, advised in the use of these throws for rehabilitation and training.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41(5):296-303, Epub 5 January 2011. doi:10.2519/jospt.2011.3568

KEY WORDS: crow-hop, elbow, interval throwing program, kinematics, shoulder

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory biomechanics study using a repeated-measures, counterbalanced design. OBJECTIVES: To compare patellofemoral joint force and stress between a short- and long-step forward lunge both with and without a stride. BACKGROUND: Although weight-bearing forward-lunge exercises are frequently employed during rehabilitation for individuals with patellofemoral joint syndrome, patellofemoral joint force and stress and how they change with variations of the lunge exercise are currently unknown. METHODS AND MEASURES: Eighteen subjects used their 12-repetition maximum weight while performing a short- and long-step forward lunge both with and without a stride. Electromyography, ground reaction force, and kinematic variables were put into a biomechanical optimization model, and patellofemoral joint force and stress were calculated as a function of knee angle. RESULTS: Visual observation of the data show that during the forward lunge, patellofemoral joint force and stress increased progressively as knee flexion increased, and decreased progressively as knee flexion decreased. Between 70° and 90° of knee flexion, patellofemoral joint force and stress were significantly greater when performing a forward lunge with a short step compared to a long step (P<.025). Between 10° and 40° of knee flexion, patellofemoral joint force and stress were significantly greater when performing a forward lunge with a stride compared to without a stride (P<.025). CONCLUSIONS: When the goal is to minimize patellofemoral joint force and stress during the forward lunge performed between 0° to 90° knee angles, it may be prudent to perform the lunge with a long step compared to a short step and without a stride compared to with a stride, because patellofemoral joint force and stress magnitudes were greater with a short step compared to a long step at higher knee flexion angles and were greater with a stride compared to without a stride at lower knee flexion angles.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008; 38(11):681-690, Epub 24 October 2008. doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2694 

KEY WORDS: knee, knee kinetics, patella, rehabilitation

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;17(6):274-278.

Key Words: biomechanics, elbow, baseball pitchers

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;18(2):402-408.

Key Words: shoulder kinematics, biomechanics, pitching

Study Design: Prospective single-group repeated-measures design. Objectives: To quantify electromyographic (EMG) muscle activity of the infraspinatus, teres minor, supraspinatus, posterior deltoid, and middle deltoid during exercises commonly used to strengthen the shoulder external rotators. Background: Exercises to strengthen the external rotators are commonly prescribed in rehabilitation, but the amount of EMG activity of the infraspinatus, teres minor, supraspinatus, and deltoid during these exercises has not been thoroughly studied to determine which exercises would be most effective to achieve strength gains. Methods and Measures: EMG measured using intramuscular electrodes were analyzed in 10 healthy subjects during 7 shoulder exercises: prone horizontal abduction at 100° of abduction and full external rotation (ER), prone ER at 90° of abduction, standing ER at 90° of abduction, standing ER in the scapular plane (45° abduction, 30° horizontal adduction), standing ER at 0° of abduction, standing ER at 0° of abduction with a towel roll, and sidelying ER at 0° of abduction. The peak percentage of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) for each muscle was compared among exercises using a 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (P<.05). Results: EMG activity varied significantly among the 7 exercises. Sidelying ER produced the greatest amount of EMG activity for the infraspinatus (62% MVIC) and teres minor (67% MVIC). The greatest amount of activity of the supraspinatus (82% MVIC), middle deltoid (87% MVIC), and posterior deltoid (88% MVIC) was observed during prone horizontal abduction at 100° with full ER. Conclusions: Results from this study provide initial information to develop rehabilitation programs. It also provides information helpful for the design and conduct of future studies.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(7):385-394. doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.0665 

Key Words: dynamic stabilization, infraspinatus, supraspinatus, teres minor

Underhand pitching has received minimal attention in the sports medicine literature. This may be due to the perception that compared with overhead pitching, the underhand motion creates less stress on the arm, which results in fewer injuries. The purpose of this study was to calculate kinematic and kinetic parameters for the pitching motion used in fast pitch softball. Eight female fast pitch softball pitchers were recorded with a four-camera system (200 Hz). The results indicated that high forces and torques were experienced at the shoulder and elbow during the delivery phase. Peak compressive forces at the elbow and shoulder equal to 70-98% of body weight were produced. Shoulder extension and abduction torques equal to 9-10% of body weight x height were calculated. Elbow flexion torque was exerted to control elbow extension and initiate elbow flexion. The demand on the biceps labrum complex to simultaneously resist glenohumeral distraction and produce elbow flexion makes this structure susceptible to overuse injury.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28(6):405-414.

Key Words: biomechanics, underhand pitching, softball, shoulder, elbow