<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Gregory Marchetti, PT, PhD]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/gregorymarchetti</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://feedvalidator.org/docs/rss2.html</docs>
<generator>www.eResources.com (Generator)</generator>
<managingEditor>jospt@eresources.com (JOSPT)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jospt@eresources.com (eResources)</webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.asp" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>The Effects of Group Cycling on Gait and Pain-Related Disability in Individuals With Mild-to-Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2792/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.amandajsalacinski/author.asp">Amanda J. Salacinski</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kellykrohn/author.asp">Kelly Krohn</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.scottflewis/author.asp">Scott F. Lewis</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.meganlholland/author.asp">Megan L. Holland</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kathrynireland/author.asp">Kathryn Ireland</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.gregorymarchetti/author.asp">Gregory Marchetti</a><br /><p><font color="#000099"><strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong></font> Randomized controlled trial. <font color="#000099"><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong></font> To determine the effectiveness of a community-based program of stationary group cycling on gait, pain, and physical function in individuals with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA). <font color="#000099"><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong></font> Knee pain and disability are common symptoms in individuals with knee OA. Though exercise for knee OA has acknowledged benefits, it has the potential to aggravate symptoms in some instances. <font color="#000099"><strong>METHODS:</strong></font> Thirty-seven subjects (27 women, 10 men) with a mean &plusmn; SD age of 57.7 &plusmn; 9.8 years were randomly assigned to a cycling (n = 19) or control (n = 18) group for a 12-week intervention study. Outcome variables, measured at baseline and 12 weeks, included preferred and maximal gait velocity, a visual analog pain scale at rest and following a 6-minute walk test, muscle strength, and functional-outcome questionnaires. Data were analyzed using mixed-model analyses of variance for group and time differences. <font color="#000099"><strong>RESULTS:</strong></font> After 12 weeks, the individuals receiving the cycling intervention showed significantly greater improvements (<em>P</em>&lt;.05) for preferred gait velocity (mean difference between groups, 8.7 cm/s; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2, 15.1), visual analog pain scale on the 6-minute walk test (mean difference, 16.5 mm; 95% CI: 2.1, 31.0), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain subscale (mean difference, 14.9 points; 95% CI: 2.6, 27.0) and stiffness subscale (mean difference, 10.8 points; 95% CI: 0.7, 21.3), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain subscale (mean difference, 13.3 points; 95% CI: 3.4, 23.3), and the Knee Outcome Survey activities of daily living subscale (mean difference, 13.9 points; 95% CI: 2.0, 25.9) compared to controls. <font color="#000099"><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong></font> Stationary group cycling may be an effective exercise option for individuals with mild-to-moderate knee OA and may reduce pain with walking. US trial registration NCT00917618. <font color="#000099"><strong>LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:</strong></font> Therapy, level 1b&ndash;.</p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(12):985-995, Epub 2 August 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3813</em></p><p><font color="#000099"><strong>KEY WORDS:</strong></font> arthritis, gait patterns, group exercise, spinning</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2792/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Clinical Outcome From Mechanical Intermittent Cervical Traction for the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Case Series</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.361/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.priscamoeti/author.asp">Prisca Moeti</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.gregorymarchetti/author.asp">Gregory Marchetti</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design: </strong>Case series. <strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the clinical outcomes of 15 patients with cervical radiculopathy treated with mechanical intermittent cervical traction. <strong>Background: </strong>Effectiveness of traction for the treatment of cervical spinal syndromes is controversial and the outcome of this treatment has not been established in the literature. <strong>Methods and Measures:</strong> Fifteen patients (45.5 &plusmn; 13 years) completed a course of treatment using mechanical intermittent cervical traction. Eleven patients presented at baseline with radicular symptoms of 12 weeks duration or less, and 4 patients had long-standing radicular symptoms lasting more than 12 weeks. Outcome was measured using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). <strong>Results: </strong>Eight of the 15 cases (53%) in this series demonstrated complete pain resolution; these patients had symptom duration of 12 weeks and less. Seven of these 8 cases displayed a final NDI of 10% or less. Three out of 4 of the patients with symptom duration less than 12 weeks showed no reduction in pain or increased pain rating, with minimal change in perceived disability of 12% or less. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this case series, patients with radicular symptoms lasting for 12 weeks and less demonstrated a reduction in pain and perceived disability. The NDI, when used in conjunction with the NPRS, provides a more comprehensive assessment of the patient with cervical radiculopathy, thus allowing the clinician to make a better judgment about the clinical effects of cervical traction. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001;31(4):207-213. </p><p><strong>Key Words: </strong>disability, neck pain, traction, treatment outcome</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.361/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>
