<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - James R. Andrews, MD]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/jamesrandrews</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://feedvalidator.org/docs/rss2.html</docs>
<generator>www.eResources.com (Generator)</generator>
<managingEditor>jospt@eresources.com (JOSPT)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jospt@eresources.com (eResources)</webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.asp" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Criteria-Based Management of an Acute Multistructure Knee Injury in a Professional Football Player: A Case Report</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2625/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.ajyenchak/author.asp">A.J. Yenchak</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.christopheraarrigo/author.asp">Christopher A. Arrigo</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.charlesdsimpson/author.asp">Charles D. Simpson</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p><font color="#990000"><strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong></font> Case report. <font color="#990000"><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong></font> Joint stiffness, also called arthrofibrosis, remains the primary complication following any reconstructive knee surgery. Acute anterior cruciate ligament surgery, performed with concomitant multiple ligamentous repair and/or reconstruction, further increases the likelihood of developing impaired knee motion following surgery. The purpose of this case report is to present a criteria-based approach to the postoperative management of a multiligament knee injury. <font color="#990000"><strong>CASE DESCRIPTION:</strong></font> A 25-year-old male professional football player sustained a contact injury to his right knee while making a tackle during a regular season game in 2007. He underwent an acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, with concomitant posterolateral corner repair, biceps femoris/iliotibial band repair, lateral collateral ligament repair, and a medial meniscocapsular junction repair. He completed 17 weeks of a multiphased rehabilitation program that emphasized immediate range of motion, low-load long-duration stretching, therapeutic exercise, neuromuscular reeducation/perturbation training, plyometrics, and sport-specific functional drills. Electrical neurostimulation was implemented during the early stages of rehabilitation to control postoperative pain and to promote a steady progression of therapeutic exercise activity. <font color="#990000"><strong>OUTCOMES:</strong></font> The patient was cleared to begin sport-specific activity 7 months after major multistructure reconstructive knee surgery. He began the 2008 season on the physically-unable-to-perform list, but was activated midseason and played in every game thereafter. During the 2009 and 2010 seasons, he played all regular season games and all playoff games as a starter, and continues to start as a defensive cornerback in the National Football League. <font color="#990000"><strong>DISCUSSION:</strong></font> This case report highlights the clinical decision-making process and management involved in an acute multiple ligamentous knee injury/reconstruction. <font color="#990000"><strong>LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:</strong></font> Therapy, level 4. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41(9):675-686. doi:10.2519/jospt.2011.3453</em> </p><p><font color="#990000"><strong>KEY WORDS:</strong></font> ACL, anterior cruciate ligament, arthrofibrosis, posterolateral corner</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2625/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Biomechanical Comparison of Baseball Pitching and Long-Toss: Implications for Training and Rehabilitation</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2537/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.glennsfleisig/author.asp">Glenn S. Fleisig</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.beckybolt/author.asp">Becky Bolt</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davefortenbaugh/author.asp">Dave Fortenbaugh</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p><strong><font color="#000099">STUDY DESIGN:</font></strong> Controlled laboratory study. <strong><font color="#000099">OBJECTIVES:</font></strong> To test for kinematic and kinetic differences between baseball pitching from a mound and long-toss on flat ground. <strong><font color="#000099">BACKGROUND:</font></strong> Long-toss throws from flat ground are commonly used by baseball pitchers for rehabilitation, conditioning, and training. However, there is controversy over the biomechanics and functionality of such throws. <strong><font color="#000099">METHODS:</font></strong> Seventeen healthy, college baseball pitchers pitched fastballs 18.4 m from a mound to a strike zone, and threw 37 m, 55 m, and maximum distance from flat ground. For the 37-m and 55-m throws, participants were instructed to throw &ldquo;hard, on a horizontal line.&rdquo; For the maximum-distance throw, no constraint on trajectory was given. Kinematics and kinetics were measured with a 3-dimensional, automated motion analysis system. Repeated-measures analyses of variance, with post hoc paired t tests, were used to compare the 4 throw types within pitchers. <strong><font color="#000099">RESULTS:</font></strong> At foot contact, the participant&rsquo;s shoulder line was nearly horizontal when pitching from a mound and became progressively more inclined as throwing distance increased. At arm cocking, the greatest amount of shoulder external rotation (mean &plusmn; SD, 180&deg; &plusmn; 11&deg;), elbow flexion (109&deg; &plusmn; 10&deg;), shoulder internal rotation torque (101 &plusmn; 17 Nm), and elbow varus torque (100 &plusmn; 18 Nm) were measured during the maximum-distance throws. Elbow extension velocity was also greatest for the maximum-distance throws (2573&deg;/s &plusmn; 203&deg;/s). Forward trunk tilt at the instant of ball release decreased as throwing distance increased. <strong><font color="#000099">CONCLUSION:</font></strong> Hard, horizontal, flat-ground throws have biomechanical patterns similar to those of pitching and are, therefore, reasonable exercises for pitchers. However, maximum-distance throws produce increased torques and changes in kinematics. Caution is, therefore, advised in the use of these throws for rehabilitation and training. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41(5):296-303, Epub 5 January 2011. doi:10.2519/jospt.2011.3568</em></p><p><strong><font color="#000099">KEY WORDS:</font></strong> crow-hop, elbow, interval throwing program, kinematics, shoulder</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2537/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Letters to the Editor-in-Chief</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2471/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.barrettldorko/author.asp">Barrett L. Dorko</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jasonlsilvernail/author.asp">Jason L. Silvernail</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.chrisgmaher/author.asp">Chris G. Maher</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.markjhancock/author.asp">Mark J. Hancock</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.brucerwilk/author.asp">Bruce R. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffreytstenback/author.asp">Jeffrey T. Stenback</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.cynthiagonzalez/author.asp">Cynthia Gonzalez</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.christopherjagessar/author.asp">Christopher Jagessar</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.sukienau/author.asp">Sukie Nau</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.annmariemuniz/author.asp">Annmarie Muniz</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.paulemintken/author.asp">Paul E. Mintken</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.carlderosa/author.asp">Carl DeRosa</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.tamaralittle/author.asp">Tamara Little</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.brittsmith/author.asp">Britt Smith</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.rafaelfescamilla/author.asp">Rafael F. Escamilla</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.clarelewis/author.asp">Clare Lewis</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.duncanbell/author.asp">Duncan Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.gwenbramblet/author.asp">Gwen Bramblet</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jasondaffron/author.asp">Jason Daffron</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.stevelambert/author.asp">Steve Lambert</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.amandapecson/author.asp">Amanda Pecson</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.lonniepaulos/author.asp">Lonnie Paulos</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p>Letters to the Editor-in-Chief of <em>JOSPT</em> as follows:</p><ul><li>&quot;Manual Magic: The Method Is Not the Trick&quot; and Authors&#39; Response</li><li>&quot;Moving Past Sleight of Hand&quot; and Authors&#39; Response</li><li>&quot;Core Muscle Activation During Swiss Ball and Traditional Abdominal Exercises&quot; and Authors&#39; Response</li></ul><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40(8):535-541. doi:10.2519/jospt.2010.0201</em></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2471/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Core Muscle Activation During Swiss Ball and Traditional Abdominal Exercises</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2442/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.rafaelfescamilla/author.asp">Rafael F. Escamilla</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.clarelewis/author.asp">Clare Lewis</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.duncanbell/author.asp">Duncan Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.gwenbramblet/author.asp">Gwen Bramblet</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jasondaffron/author.asp">Jason Daffron</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.stevelambert/author.asp">Steve Lambert</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.amandapecson/author.asp">Amanda Pecson</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.rodneyimamura/author.asp">Rodney Imamura</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.lonniepaulos/author.asp">Lonnie Paulos</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p><font color="#000099"><strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong></font> Controlled laboratory study using a repeated-measures, counterbalanced design. <font color="#000099"><strong>OBJECTIVES:</strong></font> To test the ability of 8 Swiss ball exercises (roll-out, pike, knee-up, skier, hip extension right, hip extension left, decline push-up, and sitting march right) and 2 traditional abdominal exercises (crunch and bent-knee sit-up) on activating core (lumbopelvic hip complex) musculature. <font color="#000099"><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong></font> Numerous Swiss ball abdominal exercises are employed for core muscle strengthening during training and rehabilitation, but there are minimal data to substantiate the ability of these exercises to recruit core muscles. It is also unknown how core muscle recruitment in many of these Swiss ball exercises compares to core muscle recruitment in traditional abdominal exercises such as the crunch and bent-knee sit-up. <font color="#000099"><strong>METHODS:</strong></font> A convenience sample of 18 subjects performed 5 repetitions for each exercise. Electromyographic (EMG) data were recorded on the right side for upper and lower rectus abdominis, external and internal oblique, latissimus dorsi, lumbar paraspinals, and rectus femoris, and then normalized using maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs). <font color="#000099"><strong>RESULTS:</strong></font> EMG signals during the roll-out and pike exercises for the upper rectus abdominis (63% and 46% MVIC, respectively), lower rectus abdominis (53% and 55% MVIC, respectively), external oblique (46% and 84% MVIC, respectively), and internal oblique (46% and 56% MVIC, respectively) were significantly greater compared to most other exercises, where EMG signals ranged between 7% to 53% MVIC for the upper rectus abdominis, 7% to 44% MVIC for the lower rectus abdominis, 14% to 73% MVIC for the external oblique, and 16% to 47% MVIC for the internal oblique. The lowest EMG signals were consistently found in the sitting march right exercise. Latissimus dorsi EMG signals were greatest in the pike, knee-up, skier, hip extension right and left, and decline push-up (17%-25% MVIC), and least with the sitting march right, crunch, and bent-knee sit-up exercises (7%-8% MVIC). Rectus femoris EMG signal was greatest with the hip extension left exercise (35% MVIC), and least with the crunch, roll-out, hip extension right, and decline push-up exercises (6%-10% MVIC). Lumbar paraspinal EMG signal was relative low (less than 10% MVIC) for all exercises. <font color="#000099"><strong>CONCLUSIONS:</strong></font> The roll-out and pike were the most effective exercises in activating upper and lower rectus abdominis, external and internal obliques, and latissimus dorsi muscles, while minimizing lumbar paraspinals and rectus femoris activity. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40(5):265-276, Epub 22 April 2010. doi:10.2519/jospt.2010.3073 </em></p><p><font color="#000099"><strong>KEY WORDS:</strong></font> crunch, EMG, low back pain, lumbar spine, rectus abdominis, sit-up</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2442/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Shoulder Injuries in the Overhead Athlete</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2293/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.padraicobma/author.asp">Padraic Obma</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.charlesdsimpson/author.asp">Charles D. Simpson</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.elylecain/author.asp">E. Lyle Cain</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffreyrdugas/author.asp">Jeffrey R. Dugas</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p><strong><font color="#999900">SYNOPSIS:</font></strong> The overhead throwing motion is an extremely skillful and intricate movement. When pitching, the overhead throwing athlete places extraordinary demands on the shoulder complex subsequent to the tremendous forces that are generated. The thrower&rsquo;s shoulder must be lax enough to allow excessive external rotation but stable enough to prevent symptomatic humeral head subluxations, thus requiring a delicate balance between mobility and functional stability. We refer to this as the &quot;thrower&rsquo;s paradox.&quot; This balance is frequently compromised and believed to lead to various types of injuries to the surrounding tissues. Frequently, injuries can be successfully treated with a well-structured and carefully implemented nonoperative rehabilitation program. The key to successful nonoperative treatment is a thorough clinical examination and accurate diagnosis. Rehabilitation follows a structured, multiphase approach, with emphasis on controlling inflammation, restoring muscles&rsquo; balance, improving soft tissue flexibility, enhancing proprioception and neuromuscular control, and efficiently returning the athlete to competitive throwing. Athletes often exhibit numerous adaptive changes that develop from the repetitive microtraumatic stresses occurring during overhead throwing. Treatment should include the restoration of these adaptations. <strong><font color="#999900">LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:</font></strong> Level 5. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(2):38-54. doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.2929</em> </p><p><strong><font color="#999900">KEYWORDS:</font></strong> baseball, glenohumeral joint, labral lesions, pitching, rotator cuff</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2293/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Patellofemoral Joint Force and Stress Between a Short- and Long-Step Forward Lunge</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2258/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.rafaelfescamilla/author.asp">Rafael F. Escamilla</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.naiquanzheng/author.asp">Naiquan Zheng</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.torandmacleod/author.asp">Toran D. MacLeod</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.wbrentedwards/author.asp">W. Brent Edwards</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.alanhreljac/author.asp">Alan Hreljac</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.glennsfleisig/author.asp">Glenn S. Fleisig</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.claudetmoorman/author.asp">Claude T. Moorman</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.rodneyimamura/author.asp">Rodney Imamura</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p><strong><font color="#000099">STUDY DESIGN:</font></strong>&nbsp;Controlled laboratory biomechanics study using a repeated-measures, counterbalanced design.&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">OBJECTIVES:</font></strong> To compare patellofemoral joint force and stress between a short- and long-step forward lunge both with and without a stride.&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">BACKGROUND:</font></strong> Although weight-bearing forward-lunge exercises are frequently employed during rehabilitation for individuals with patellofemoral joint syndrome, patellofemoral joint force and stress and how they change with variations of the lunge exercise are currently unknown.&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">METHODS AND MEASURES:</font></strong> Eighteen subjects used their 12-repetition maximum weight while performing a short- and long-step forward lunge both with and without a stride. Electromyography, ground reaction force, and kinematic variables were put into a biomechanical optimization model, and patellofemoral joint force and stress were calculated as a function of knee angle.&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">RESULTS:</font></strong> Visual observation of the data show that during the forward lunge,&nbsp;patellofemoral joint force and stress increased progressively as knee flexion increased, and decreased progressively as knee flexion decreased. Between 70&deg;&nbsp;and 90&deg; of knee flexion, patellofemoral joint force and stress were significantly greater when performing a forward lunge with a short step compared to a long step (<em>P</em>&lt;.025).&nbsp;Between 10&deg; and 40&deg; of knee flexion, patellofemoral joint force and stress were significantly greater when performing a forward lunge with a stride compared to without a stride (<em>P</em>&lt;.025).&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">CONCLUSIONS:</font></strong> When the goal is to minimize patellofemoral joint force and stress during the forward lunge performed between 0&deg; to 90&deg; knee angles, it may be prudent to perform the lunge with a long step compared to a short step and without a stride compared to with a stride, because patellofemoral joint force and stress magnitudes were greater with a short step compared to a long step at higher knee flexion angles and were greater with a stride compared to without a stride at lower knee flexion angles.</p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008; 38(11):681-690, Epub 24 October&nbsp;2008. doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2694</em>&nbsp; </p><p><strong><font color="#000099">KEY WORDS:</font></strong>&nbsp;knee, knee kinetics, patella, rehabilitation</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2258/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Performance Profile-Directed Simulated Game: An Objective Functional Evaluation for Baseball Pitchers*</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1912/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.aeugenecoleman/author.asp">A. Eugene Coleman</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaeljaxe/author.asp">Michael J. Axe</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br />To objectively evaluate the function of the throwing shoulder after an injury, a preinjury performance profile should have been recorded and a simulated game based upon this profile be established for comparison. The performance profile must include a strength or power component (fastball velocity), an accuracy component (fastball-for-strike percentage), and an endurance component (the decrease in fastball velocity per inning). The simulated game requires a specific number of innings, a specific number of pitches per inning, a pitch selection ratio, a rest interval between innings, and a means to record the data. This information is not available in most circumstances. The authors have collected data from 98 starting pitchers in the National Baseball League from 1983 through 1985 to develop a profile for those pitchers lacking preinjury performance profiles. Since 1983, in 486 games, 145,886 consecutive pitches were logged using a custom data form and entered into an IBM- 360 computer. Based upon the summation of the performance profiles of these pitchers, a simulated game should be 61/3 + 1 l/3 innings with 15 + 2.4 pitches per inning. The interval between innings pitched should be a minimum of 9 minutes and one should expect a 2% or 1.5 mph decrease in the fastball velocity from the first through the sixth innings with a fastball-for-strike percentage of 64%. While this is a study of major league starting pitchers, the concept of a preinjury performance profile to define full rehabilitation is applicable from the Babe Ruth league through professional baseball. <p>J Ortho Sports Phys Ther 1987;9(3):101-105.</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1912/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Isokinetic Testing of the Shoulder Abductors and Adductors: Windowed vs Nonwindowed Data Collection</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1630/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.christopheraarrigo/author.asp">Christopher A. Arrigo</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br />Presented at the Sports Physical Therapy Section Team Concept Meeting, December 1991, New Orleans, LA <p>The manner of acquiring strength-testing data may influence the results of an investigation. The purpose of this study was to determine if a significant difference exists between windowed and unwindowed data collection during isokinetic testing of the shoulder abductors/adductors. Fifty healthy professional baseball pitchers participated in this study. Testing was performed on a Biodex isokinetic dynamometer at 180 and 300&deg;/sec for both the throwing and nonthrowing shoulders. Testing procedures regarding testing protocol, repetitions, positioning, and stabilization followed established guidelines for each subject. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test with a p &lt; 0.01 level of significance. Statistically significant differences were demonstrated between windowed and unwindowed mean peak torque data for both shoulders at both test speeds. The results indicated an average nonthrowing arm difference of 20.2 ft/lbs at 180&deg;/sec and 51.7 ft/lbs at 300&deg;/ sec for the abductors. In each instance, the unwindowed mean peak torque values were higher than the windowed values, and significant end range torque spikes were elicited during unwindowed data collection. The nonthrowing adductors exhibited an average of 39.3 and 48.3 ft/lb differences at 180 and 300&deg;/sec, respectively. The throwing shoulder demonstrated average abductor differences of 25.6 ft/lbs at 180&deg;/sec and 47.7 ft/lbs at 300&deg;/sec. The average throwing adductor difference was 24.4 ft/lbs and 54.6 ft/lbs, respectively, at both test speeds. This investigation offers clinical relevance for those using isokinetic testing of the shoulder abductors/adductors in demonstrating the significant differences between windowed and unwindowed data, identifying torque spike data misinterpretation, and describing a clinical means of controlling aberrant torque production during testing. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992;15(2):107-112.</p><p>Key Words: isokinetics, shoulder testing, torque spikes, windowed data</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1630/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Current Concepts in the Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Disruption</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1601/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br />Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries has changed considerably in recent years. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the past and present treatment for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disruptions in athletic individuals. In addition, this paper will discuss current trends in rehabilitation, such as immediate motion, weight bearing, and close kinetic chain exercises, and provide the scientific rationale for these rehabilitation principles. The treatment of individuals who have suffered an ACL disruption has changed dramatically over the years. The treatment of ACL ruptures has made a full circle. The first reconstructive procedure described used a patellar tendon graft. Then primary ACL repairs were advocated. With the limited success of that procedure, the nonoperative treatment was popularized, with reconstruction performed only after the conservative program failed. With this treatment plan, clinicians noted early degenerative joint changes and an increase in meniscus tears in the ACL deficient knee. Thus, reconstructive surgery using a patellar tendon graft was again advocated. Today, the current trend in the treatment of ACL tears is an arthroscopically assisted procedure to reconstruct the ACL using a bone-tendon-bone graft, such as a patellar tendon. The surgery employs accurate graft placement, tensioning, and fixation, which allows the therapist the opportunity to utilize immediate motion and weight bearing, in addition to strengthening exercises. This paper attempts to explain the rehabilitation process following ACL reconstruction using current scientific and clinical research. The program is based on the anatomy, biomechanics, and healing process of the knee, joint, and ACL. The clinical implications of this paper are numerous. First, we believe the information will assist clinicians in developing their own programs. Second, the data will assist the reader in understanding the sequential healing process. Finally, this paper documents that immediate aggressive rehabilitation is not deleterious to the ACL graft, and early therapy improves the functional outcome. <p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992;15(6):279-293.</p><p>Key Words: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, rehabilitation, clinical outcome</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1601/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Effects of Pad Placement and Angular Velocity on Tibial Displacement during Isokinetic Exercise</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1546/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br />Presented at the Sports Physical Therapy Section Team Concept Meeting, December 1992, Newport Beach, CA. <p>The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of proximal single resistance pad placement (PSPP) and distal single pad placement (DSPP) on tibial displacement during isokinetic exercise on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. This study is important to the clinician because it documents tibial displacement during open chain isokinetic knee extension exercise at various isokinetic speeds. In addition, this study documents the range of motion where the greatest amount of anterior tibial displacement occurs. The anterior displacement of the tibia was recorded by a computerized knee laxity testing device during isokinetic exercise. Data were collected from 12 ACL-deficient knees. Each subject was tested on an OSI Knee Signature System for quantifiable tibial displacement during a Lachman&#39;s test, anterior drawer test, and active vs. passive knee extension. Following this, each subject was tested on a Biodex isokinetic dynamometer at isokinetic velocities of 60, 180, and 300&deg;/sec with the computerized knee laxity testing device in place. Pad placement consisted of distal single pad placement, which is 1 inch proximal to the medial malleolus, and proximal single pad placement, which is 3 inches proximal to the DSPP location. The testing procedure was standardized, and peak torque was monitored to ensure consistent maximal effort throughout the study. The results indicated that PSPP resulted in less anterior tibial displacement at all three test speeds. The peak anterior tibial displacement occurred in a range from 30 to 15&deg; of knee flexion at both pad placements and all three test speeds. Lastly, the greatest amount of anterior tibial displacement occurred at the 60&deg;/sec isokinetic velocity, whereas less displacement occurred at 180 and 300&deg;/sec, respectively. This study documents that high-speed isokinetics result in less anterior tibial displacement than low-speed isokinetics, and if ACL graft strength or maturation is questionable, a 30&deg; extension block or a proximal resistance pad may be used. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;17(1):24-30.</p><p>Key Words: anterior cruciate ligament, tibial displacement, resistive exercise</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1546/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stretch-Shortening Drills for the Upper Extremities: Theory and Clinical Application</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1517/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaellvoight/author.asp">Michael L. Voight</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaelakeirns/author.asp">Michael A. Keirns</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.verngambetta/author.asp">Vern Gambetta</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.charlesjdillman/author.asp">Charles J. Dillman</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p>Enhanced athletic performance emphasizes the muscle&#39;s ability to exert maximal force output in a minimal amount of time. Exaggerated maximal muscular force develops due to athletic movements producing a repeated series of stretch-shortening cycles. The stretch-shortening cycle occurs when elastic loading, through an eccentric muscular contraction, is followed by a burst of concentric muscular contraction. A form of exercise called plyometrics employs a quick, powerful movement involving a prestretch of the muscle, followed by a shortening, concentric muscular contraction, thus utilizing the stretch-shortening muscular cycle. The literature contains numerous references to plyometric training for the lower extremity, but there is a lack of information on the upper extremity plyometric program. Overhead activities, such as throwing, necessitate elastic loading to produce maximal, explosive, concentric muscular contractions. Plyometric exercise employs the concept of the stretch-shortening muscular cycle. The rehabilitation concept of specificity of training suggests plyometric exercise drills should be performed by the throwing athlete. This paper discusses the basic neurophysiological science and theoretical basis for plyometric exercise, and it describes an upper extremity stretch-shortening exercise program for the throwing athlete. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;17(5):225-239.</p><p>Key Words: stretch-shortening cycle, exercise, muscle spindle</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1517/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Biomechanics of the Elbow during Baseball Pitching</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1512/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.sherrylwerner/author.asp">Sherry L. Werner</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.glennsfleisig/author.asp">Glenn S. Fleisig</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.charlesjdillman/author.asp">Charles J. Dillman</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br />By understanding pitching biomechanics, therapists can develop better preventive and rehabilitative programs for pitchers. The purpose of this study was to quantify and explain the joint motions, loads, and muscle activity that occur at the elbow during baseball pitching. Seven healthy, adult pitchers were examined with synchronized high-speed video digitization and surface electromyography. Elbow extension before ball release corresponded with a decrease in biceps activity and an increase in triceps activity. A varus torque of 120 Nm, acting to resist valgus stress, occurred near the time of maximum shoulder external rotation. Previous cadaveric research showed that the ulnar collateral ligament by itself cannot withstand a valgus load of this magnitude. Triceps, wrist flexor-pronator, and anconeus activity during peak valgus stress suggests that these muscles may act as dynamic stabilizers to assist the ulnar collateral ligament in preventing valgus extension overload. <p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;17(6):274-278.</p><p>Key Words: biomechanics, elbow, baseball pitchers</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1512/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rehabilitation of the Elbow in the Throwing Athlete</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1510/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.christopheraarrigo/author.asp">Christopher A. Arrigo</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br />Rehabilitation following an injury to the elbow joint complex is common in physical therapy practice. The unique anatomical considerations of the elbow joint provide a significant challenge to the therapist in rehabilitating elbow injuries. The purpose of this paper is to describe the rehabilitation process for various elbow pathologies and provide a rationale for their treatment. The rehabilitation process for the injured elbow presented in this paper will emphasize phases that are progressive, sequential, and based on clinical and scientific research. <p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;17(6):305-317.</p><p>Key Words: rehabilitation, elbow joint complex, baseball injuries</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1510/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Physical Examination of the Thrower&#8217;s Elbow</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1508/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.yvonneesatterwhite/author.asp">Yvonne E. Satterwhite</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffreyltedder/author.asp">Jeffrey L. Tedder</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p>The physical examination of the thrower&#39;s elbow presents the clinician with the clinical challenge of differentially diagnosing specific pathologies. The examination should include a thorough history and a well-organized physical examination, which relies on an extensive knowledge of the functional anatomy of the elbow. The components of an elbow examination include inspection/observation, palpation of bony and soft tissues, range of motion assessment, resisted muscle testing (both manual and mechanical), neurologic testing, and special tests. The special tests commonly performed on the thrower&#39;s elbow are the Tinel test, tennis elbow sign, ulnar collateral ligament stability testing, valgus extension overload test, and radiocapitella chondromalacia test. Other tests include radiographic examination, such as computerized tomograph arthrogram and magnetic resonance imaging testing. Information presented in this paper will provide the clinician with a systematic and thorough evaluation process for the thrower&#39;s elbow. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;17(6):296-304.</p><p>Key Words: elbow joint complex, elbow pathologies, stability testing</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1508/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Common Elbow Problems in the Athlete</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1507/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesawhiteside/author.asp">James A. Whiteside</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p>Because of the popularity of sports participation, sports physical therapists must recognize in the athlete the many clinical conditions that occur about the elbow. The purpose of this paper is to present the most common elbow problems that an athlete may encounter and to provide information to facilitate recognition of elbow pathology. This information is essential before initiating treatment. An attempt is made to include sprains, strains, neuropathies, dislocations, fractures, contusions, vascular insults, and skin problems in the distal humerus, elbow, and proximal forearm of both the immature and mature athlete. Comprehension of the mechanism of injury aids clinical evaluation and rehabilitation and enhances early return to activity. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;17(6):289-295.</p><p>Key Words: overload injuries, elbow, nerve entrapment</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1507/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Biomechanics of Pitching with Emphasis upon Shoulder Kinematics</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1498/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.charlesjdillman/author.asp">Charles J. Dillman</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.glennsfleisig/author.asp">Glenn S. Fleisig</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br />The American Sports Medicine Institute conducts research to increase understanding of mechanisms involved in upper extremity injuries to throwing athletes. This paper presents a qualitative overview of pitching and a detailed quantitative description of arm motion about the shoulder during this highly dynamic activity. Data on kinematics of arm motions about the shoulder are presented for 29 elite throwers. The major motion about the shoulder is external/internal rotation. Scapulothoracic and glenohumeral flexibility permit the arm to reach an externally rotated position of 175&deg;. Approximately 30 msec before release, the arm internally rotates 80&deg;, reaching peak angular velocities near 7,000&deg;/sec. In rehabilitation of injured throwers, there is a need to appreciate the highly dynamic nature of this skill and to attempt to simulate these dynamic motions and loads as part of the final phase of treatment before the athlete returns to competition. <p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;18(2):402-408.</p><p>Key Words: shoulder kinematics, biomechanics, pitching</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1498/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Classification and Treatment of Rotator Cuff Injuries in the Overhand Athlete</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1495/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.keithmeister/author.asp">Keith Meister</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p>Rotator cuff injury in athletes results from accumulation of microtrauma to both the static and dynamic stabilizers of the shoulder. Our classification of these injuries and treatment protocol is based on knowledge of the pathophysiology of events leading to rotator cuff failure. Rotator cuff disease is attributed to one of five different modes of failure: primary compressive disease, secondary compressive disease, primary tensile overload, secondary tensile overload, and macrotraumatic injuries. Although disease is categorized based on a single failure mode, there is often significant overlap between the mechanisms of injury leading to the disease. Categorization and, consequently, treatment of the injury rely upon proper identification of the primary pathology and an understanding of the causative factors leading to rotator cuff failure. In most cases conservative management is successful, but, in the refractory cases, minimally invasive surgical techniques have also been successful in returning most athletes to a premorbid level of function. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;18(2):413-421.</p><p>Key Words: rotator cuff, tensile failure, compressive disease</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1495/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Quadriceps Muscular Strength After Removal of the Central Third Patellar Tendon for Contralateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery: A Case Study</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1457/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.williamgclancy/author.asp">William G. Clancy</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p>Paper submitted before conversion to SI units was required.</p><p>Surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using a patellar tendon autograft is a common orthopaedic procedure. Complications such as arthrofibrosis, patellar fracture, significant donor site pain, and quadriceps muscle weakness can occur from this procedure. Previous studies have not documented the effects of isolated graft procurement without concomitant ligamentous reconstruction on the donor extremity. </p><p>This case study documents the clinical outcome results of an individual who underwent a central one-third graft harvest from his contralateral uninjured knee for an ACL graft of his injured ACL-deficient knee. The results indicate that at 4 months following graft procurement, the knee extensors were equal to the preoperative isokinetic test results of that leg. In addition, the patient exhibited full range of motion and no patellofemoral complaints or dysfunction. At 12 months postsurgery, the graft donor leg was 5-9% stronger than the preoperative test results. The results of this case study suggest that isolated harvesting of a 10-mm central patellar tendon free graft may not result in significant quadriceps muscle weakness or contribute to donor site pain. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;18(6):692-697.</p>Key Words: anterior cruciate ligament, patellar tendon autograft, rehabilitation]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1457/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Recipient of the 2002 Sports Physical Therapy Section Excellence in Research Award: Thermal-Assisted Capsular Shrinkage of the Glenohumeral Joint in Overhead Athletes: A 15- to 47-Month Follow-up</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.210/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaelmreinold/author.asp">Michael M. Reinold</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.toddrhooks/author.asp">Todd R. Hooks</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffreyrdugas/author.asp">Jeffrey R. Dugas</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> Descriptive postoperative follow-up research. <strong>Objectives:</strong> The purpose of this investigation was to describe the return-to-competition rate and functional outcome of overhead athletes following arthroscopic thermal-assisted capsular shrinkage (TACS). <strong>Background:</strong> Traditional open procedures to correct instability in overhead athletes, such as capsulolabral repairs and capsular shifts, have produced less-than-favorable results, which have led to the development of TACS. Currently there are no long-term follow-up studies documenting the efficacy of this procedure in groups greater than 31 subjects or for a time period greater than 27 months. <strong>Methods and Measures:</strong> Two hundred thirty-one consecutive overhead athletes who due to symptoms of hyperlaxity had previously undergone a TACS procedure from 1997 to 1999 were selected for inclusion in the study. During a 1-month period, 130 of these athletes (mean age &plusmn; SD, 24 &plusmn; 6 years; 113 male, 17 female) were contacted by phone for follow-up at a mean of 29.3 months postoperatively (range, 15.4-46.6 months). Of the 130, 105 participated in baseball (80 pitchers), 14 in softball, 4 in football (quarterbacks), 4 in tennis, and 3 in swimming. Fifty-four (42%) subjects were professional, 49 (38%) collegiate, 16 (12%) high school, and 11 (8%) recreational athletes. One hundred twenty-three of the 130 (95%) underwent 1 or more concomitant procedure(s) at the time of TACS. Most commonly performed were labral debridements (69%), rotator cuff debridements (65%), and superior labral repairs (35%). Subjects who returned to competition were retrospectively evaluated using a modified Athletic Shoulder Outcome Rating Scale to subjectively assess pain, strength and endurance, stability, intensity, and performance. Overall results were based on a 90-point scale with scores of 80 to 90 representing excellent, 60 to 79 good, 40 to 59 fair, and less than 40 poor results. <strong>Results:</strong> One hundred thirteen out of 130 subjects (87%) returned to competition. Mean (&plusmn;SD) time from surgery to return to competition was 8.4 &plusmn; 4.6 months. Mean outcome score for all subjects was 79/90; 75 (66%) subjects had excellent, 24 (21%) good, 11 (10%) fair, and 3 (3%) poor result. The mean outcome score for males was 80/90 and for females was 70/90. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of overhead athletes (87%) successfully returned to competition following a TACS procedure with good-to-excellent long-term outcomes (88%). Based on the results of this study, TACS of the glenohumeral joint is a viable option for overhead athletes with pathological instability. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(8):455&ndash;467.</em> </p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> acquired laxity, baseball, rehabilitation, shoulder, shoulder instability</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.210/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Electromyographic Analysis of the Rotator Cuff and Deltoid Musculature During Common Shoulder External Rotation Exercises</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.289/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaelmreinold/author.asp">Michael M. Reinold</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.glennsfleisig/author.asp">Glenn S. Fleisig</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.nigelzheng/author.asp">Nigel Zheng</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.stevenwbarrentine/author.asp">Steven W. Barrentine</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.tereselchmielewski/author.asp">Terese L. Chmielewski</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.raydenccody/author.asp">Rayden C. Cody</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.genegjameson/author.asp">Gene G. Jameson</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design: </strong>Prospective single-group repeated-measures design. <strong>Objectives:</strong> To quantify electromyographic (EMG) muscle activity of the infraspinatus, teres minor, supraspinatus, posterior deltoid, and middle deltoid during exercises commonly used to strengthen the shoulder external rotators. <strong>Background: </strong>Exercises to strengthen the external rotators are commonly prescribed in rehabilitation, but the amount of EMG activity of the infraspinatus, teres minor, supraspinatus, and deltoid during these exercises has not been thoroughly studied to determine which exercises would be most effective to achieve strength gains. <strong>Methods and Measures: </strong>EMG measured using intramuscular electrodes were analyzed in 10 healthy subjects during 7 shoulder exercises: prone horizontal abduction at 100&deg; of abduction and full external rotation (ER), prone ER at 90&deg; of abduction, standing ER at 90&deg; of abduction, standing ER in the scapular plane (45&deg; abduction, 30&deg; horizontal adduction), standing ER at 0&deg; of abduction, standing ER at 0&deg; of abduction with a towel roll, and sidelying ER at 0&deg; of abduction. The peak percentage of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) for each muscle was compared among exercises using a 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (P&lt;.05). <strong>Results: </strong>EMG activity varied significantly among the 7 exercises. Sidelying ER produced the greatest amount of EMG activity for the infraspinatus (62% MVIC) and teres minor (67% MVIC). The greatest amount of activity of the supraspinatus (82% MVIC), middle deltoid (87% MVIC), and posterior deltoid (88% MVIC) was observed during prone horizontal abduction at 100&deg; with full ER. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this study provide initial information to develop rehabilitation programs. It also provides information helpful for the design and conduct of future studies. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34(7):385-394.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.0665&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Key Words: </strong>dynamic stabilization, infraspinatus, supraspinatus, teres minor</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.289/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Current Concepts in the Recognition and Treatment of Superior Labral (SLAP) Lesions</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.521/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaelmreinold/author.asp">Michael M. Reinold</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.christopheraarrigo/author.asp">Christopher A. Arrigo</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaelwmoser/author.asp">Michael W. Moser</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffreyrdugas/author.asp">Jeffrey R. Dugas</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p><strong>Pathology of the superior aspect of the glenoid labrum (SLAP lesion) </strong>poses a significant challenge to the rehabilitation specialist due to the complex nature and wide variety of etiological factors associated with these lesions. A thorough clinical evaluation and proper identification of the extent of labral injury is important to determine the most appropriate nonoperative and/or surgical management. Postoperative rehabilitation is based on the specific surgical procedure as well as the extent, location, and mechanism of labral pathology and associated lesions. Emphasis is placed on protecting the healing labrum, while gradually restoring range of motion, strength, and dynamic stability of the glenohumeral joint. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the anatomy and pathomechanics of SLAP lesions and review specific clinical examination techniques used to identify these lesions, including 3 newly described tests. Furthermore, a review of the current surgical management and postoperative rehabilitation guidelines is provided. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(5):273-291. doi:10.2519/jospt.2005.1701</p><p><strong>Key Words: </strong>dynamic stability, glenohumeral, rehabilitation, shoulder</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.521/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Preventing Throwing Injuries</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.611/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.glennsfleisig/author.asp">Glenn S. Fleisig</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br />&nbsp;]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.611/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Biomechanics of Windmill Softball Pitching With Implications About Injury Mechanisms at the Shoulder and Elbow</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.687/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.stevenwbarrentine/author.asp">Steven W. Barrentine</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.glennsfleisig/author.asp">Glenn S. Fleisig</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesawhiteside/author.asp">James A. Whiteside</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.rafaelfescamilla/author.asp">Rafael F. Escamilla</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p>Underhand pitching has received minimal attention in the sports medicine literature. This may be due to the perception that compared with overhead pitching, the underhand motion creates less stress on the arm, which results in fewer injuries. The purpose of this study was to calculate kinematic and kinetic parameters for the pitching motion used in fast pitch softball. Eight female fast pitch softball pitchers were recorded with a four-camera system (200 Hz). The results indicated that high forces and torques were experienced at the shoulder and elbow during the delivery phase. Peak compressive forces at the elbow and shoulder equal to 70-98% of body weight were produced. Shoulder extension and abduction torques equal to 9-10% of body weight x height were calculated. Elbow flexion torque was exerted to control elbow extension and initiate elbow flexion. The demand on the biceps labrum complex to simultaneously resist glenohumeral distraction and produce elbow flexion makes this structure susceptible to overuse injury. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28(6):405-414. </p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> biomechanics, underhand pitching, softball, shoulder, elbow</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.687/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Current Concepts: The Stabilizing Structures of the Glenohumeral Joint</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.749/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.christopheraarrigo/author.asp">Christopher A. Arrigo</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p>Significant contemporary advances have permitted a more comprehensive understanding and development of some interesting concepts about the glenohumeral joint. The purpose of this review paper is to discuss current concepts related to the anatomic stabilizing structures of the shoulder joint complex and their clinical relevance to shoulder instability. The clinical syndrome of shoulder instability represents a wide spectrum of symptoms and signs that may produce various levels of dysfunction, from subtle subluxations to gross joint instability. The glenohumeral joint attains functional stability through a delicate and intricate interaction between the passive and active stabilizing structures. The passive constraints include the bony geometry, glenoid labrum, and the glenohumeral joint capsuloligamentous structures. Conversely, the active constraints - also referred to as the active mechanisms - include the shoulder complex musculature, the proprioceptive system, and the musculoligamentous relationship. The interactions of the active and passive mechanisms, which provide passive and active glenohumeral joint stability, are thoroughly discussed in this paper. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;25(6):364-379. </p><p>Key Words: glenohumeral joint, anatomy, instability</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.749/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Physical Examination of the Glenohumeral Joint: Emphasis on the Stabilizing Structures</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.750/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.christopheraarrigo/author.asp">Christopher A. Arrigo</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p>Thorough descriptions of specific physical examination tests used to determine glenohumeral instability are lacking in the scientific literature. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the importance of the subjective history and illustrate the physical examination of the glenohumeral joint. Additionally, the authors illustrate specific stability assessment tests for the glenohumeral joint based on current basic science and clinical research. The physical examination of a patient whose history suggests subtle glenohumeral joint instability may be extremely difficult for the clinician due to the normal amount of capsular laxity commonly present in most individuals. An essential component of the physical examination is a thorough and meticulous subjective history, which includes the mechanisms of injury and/or dysfunction, chief complaint, level of disability, and aggravating movements. The physical examination must include an assessment of motion, static stability testing, muscle testing, and a neuralgic assessment. It is important that the clinician have a comprehensive understanding of various stability testing maneuvers. The evaluation techniques discussed in this paper should assist the clinician in determining the passive stability of the glenohumeral joint. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;25(6):380-389. </p><p>Key Words: glenohumeral joint, instability, assessment</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.750/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Relationship Between Subjective Knee Scores, Isokinetic Testing, and Functional Testing in the ACL-Reconstructed Knee – 1993 Berg Excellence in Research Award paper. Presented at the 15th Annual Sports Physical Therapy Section Team Concept Meeting, Wi</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1097/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.williamtromaniello/author.asp">William T. Romaniello</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.susanmsoscia/author.asp">Susan M. Soscia</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.christopheraarrigo/author.asp">Christopher A. Arrigo</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p>1993 Breg Excellence in Research Award paper. Presented at the 15th Annual Sports Physical Therapy Section Team Concept Meeting, Williamsburg, VA, October 15-17, 1993.<br /><br />It is important to examine the functional relationships between commonly performed clinical tests and to resolve inconsistencies in previous investigative results. The purpose of this study was to determine if a correlation exists between 3 commonly performed clinical tests: isokinetic isolated knee concentric muscular testing, the single-leg hop test, and the subjective knee score in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees. To determine if a relationship exists would be beneficial to clinicians in determining patient progression, treatment modification, and return-to-sport objective parameters. Several investigators have analyzed 2 of these parameters, but no one has investigated 3 parameters to date. Additionally, this study explored the concept of limb acceleration and deceleration during high-speed isokinetics and its relationship to function. Fifty patients were randomly selected (29 males) with a mean age of 23.7 years (range 15-52). The subjects completed a subjective knee score questionnaire that rated symptoms (pain, swelling, giving way) and specific sport function and completed an overall knee score assessment. The patients were then evaluated performing 3 1-legged functional tests: 1) hop for distance, 2) timed hop, and 3) cross-over triple hop. Isokinetic testing was performed on a Biodex dynamometer at 180,300, and 450&deg;/sec for knee extension/flexion. The patients&#39; mean value of the self-assessed knee rating was 86 points. Sixty-four percent of the patients exhibited normal limb symmetry (within 85%) on all 3 single-leg hop tests. Sixteen percent exhibited quadriceps strength at least 90% of the contralateral limb isokinetically. A positive correlation was noted between isokinetic knee extension peak torque (180, 300&deg;/sec) and subjective knee scores, and the 3 hop tests (p&lt;.001). A statistical trend was noted between knee extension acceleration and deceleration range at 180&deg;/sec and 300&deg;/sec for the timed hop test and triple crossover hop (r = 0.48, r = 0.49, r = 0.51, r = 0.49). No positive correlations were found for isokinetic test results for the knee flexors. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;20(2):60-73. </p><p>Key Words: knee joint stability, anterior cruciate ligament, muscle strength, functional testing</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1097/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rehabilitation of Articular Lesions in the Athlete&#8217;s Knee</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1175/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kristinbriem/author.asp">Kristin Briem</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaelmreinold/author.asp">Michael M. Reinold</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kathleenmdevine/author.asp">Kathleen M. Devine</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffreyrdugas/author.asp">Jeffrey R. Dugas</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p><strong>Articular cartilage lesions of the knee joint</strong> are common in patients of varying ages. Some articular cartilage lesions are focal lesions located on one aspect of the tibiofemoral or patellofemoral joint. Other lesions can be extremely large or involve multiple compartments of the knee joint and these are often referred to as osteoarthritis. There are numerous potential causes for the development of articular cartilage lesions: joint injury (trauma), biomechanics, genetics, activities, and biochemistry. Numerous factors also contribute to symptomatic episodes resulting from lesions to the articular cartilage: activities (sports and work), joint alignment, joint laxity, muscular weakness, genetics, dietary intake, and body mass index. </p><p><strong>Athletes appear to be more susceptible</strong> to developing articular cartilage lesions than other individuals. This is especially true with specific sports and subsequent to specific types of knee injuries. Injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament and/or menisci may increase the risk of developing an articular cartilage lesion. The treatment for an athletic patient with articular cartilage lesions is often difficult and met with limited success. In this article we will discuss several types of knee articular cartilage injuries such as focal lesions, advanced full-thickness lesions, and bone bruises. We will also discuss the risk factors for developing full-thickness articular cartilage lesions and osteoarthritis, and describe the clinical evaluation and nonoperative treatment strategies for these types of lesions in athletes. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(10):815-827.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2303</p><p><strong>Key Words: </strong>chondral lesion, exercise, nonoperative treatment, nutrition, tibiofemoral joint</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1175/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Interval Sport Programs: Guidelines for Baseball, Tennis, and Golf</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.144/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaelmreinold/author.asp">Michael M. Reinold</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamiereed/author.asp">Jamie Reed</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kencrenshaw/author.asp">Ken Crenshaw</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p>Rehabilitation specialists commonly observe upper-extremity injuries in golfers, baseball players, and tennis players. Traditional nonoperative and postoperative rehabilitation programs for these athletes involve a gradual restoration of range of motion (ROM), strength, muscular endurance, dynamic stabilization, and neuromuscular control. Upon successful completion of the early phases of the rehabilitation program, a gradual and controlled return to sport activities has been advocated by several authors. The term &lsquo;&lsquo;interval sport programs&rsquo;&rsquo; has been used to refer to functional rehabilitation guidelines that simulate sport activities. These programs are designed to progressively apply forces to the healing structures and are intended to gradually return the athlete to full athletic competition as quickly and safely as possible. The purpose of this paper is to describe specific interval sport programs currently utilized at our center to return golfers, baseball players, and tennis players to competition following an injury or surgery. In using an interval sport program (ISP) in conjunction with a structured rehabilitation program, the athlete should be able to return to full competition status. The general guidelines and specific programs outlined are used to minimize the chance of reinjury and to facilitate the return of function and confidence in the athlete. The program and its progression should be modified to meet the specific needs of each individual athlete. A comprehensive program consisting of a proper maintenance rehabilitation program incorporating strengthening, flexibility, plyometric, dynamic stabilization, and neuromuscular controls drills, as well as appropriate warm-up procedures and biomechanics, is essential in returning athletes to competition as quickly and safely as possible. </p><p>J Ortho Sports Ther. 2002; 32(6):293-298.</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.144/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rehabilitation Following Thermal-Assisted Capsular Shrinkage of the Glenohumeral Joint: Current Concepts</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.143/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaelmreinold/author.asp">Michael M. Reinold</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffreyrdugas/author.asp">Jeffrey R. Dugas</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p>Glenohumeral joint instability is a common pathology observed in the orthopedic and sports medicine settings. Overhead athletes often exhibit a certain degree of acquired laxity that can lead to various pathologies. Unfavorable results often observed with traditional open procedures to correct instability in the overhead athlete have led to the development of arthroscopic thermal-assisted capsular shrinkage (TACS). TACS is not commonly used as an isolated procedure in overhead athletes; various procedures are often performed concomitantly. The overall outcome greatly depends on a postoperative rehabilitation program that must be assessed and adjusted frequently based on several factors. Knowledge of the basic science of TACS as well as emphasis on dynamic stabilization, proprioception, and neuromuscular control are vital to the rehabilitation program for overhead athletes. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the basic science and clinical application of thermal-assisted capsular shrinkage of the glenohumeral joint as well as the postoperative rehabilitation for the overhead athlete and the patient with congenital laxity and related multidirectional instability. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002; 32(6):268&ndash;292. </p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> dynamic stabilization, glenohumeral instability, neuromuscular control, overhead athlete, SLAP lesions</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.143/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>

