Chronic compartment syndrome (CCS) is a recognized cause of recurrent leg pain in the exercising patient. Decreased muscle function has been implied in this condition. This study compared the ankle dorsiflexion torque of 10 CCS patients with that of 18 control subjects during 20 repeated, maximal, isokinetic contractions at 60°/sec. Peak torque, relative peak torque, and endurance data were collected. Results showed significantly lower peak torque and relative peak torque in the CCS group (p ≤ 0.05), supporting the implication of muscle weakness in CCS. Paradoxically, endurance was significantly higher in the CCS group (p ≤ 0.01), and there was a significant (p ≤ 0.01), negative correlation (r = -0.50) between peak torque and endurance. The relationship between the findings and CCS is discussed. Strengthening may be useful in very mild cases or in postfasciotomy patients.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993;18(5):586-589.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-group repeated-measures study. OBJECTIVE: To examine the test-retest reliability of the timed up and go (TUG) test and its validity for measuring change and predicting length of stay (LOS) on an inpatient orthopaedic rehabilitation ward. BACKGROUND: The TUG test is used to measure functional mobility of persons with musculoskeletal conditions but it has not been thoroughly tested for use in an inpatient orthopaedic rehabilitation ward. METHODS AND MEASURES: The TUG test was administered to 142 patients on admission to an orthopaedic rehabilitation ward 7 to 10 days after admission and on discharge. To test reliability, 24 subjects had these tests repeated 1 day after admission, and the intraclass correlation (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated. Change scores of the TUG test were evaluated against change scores in pain and function, and the rating of improvement of the patient and therapist. The standardized response mean (SRM) was also calculated. A regression analysis was performed to determine whether the admission TUG test score could predict LOS. RESULTS: The ICC of the TUG test was 0.80 and the SEM was 10.2 seconds. The change in TUG test scores correlated with the changes in pain (r = 0.21, P<.01) and function (r = -0.23, P<.01), and resulted in an SRM of 0.89 for subjects rated as improved. The admission TUG test scores accounted for only 3.4% of the variance in inpatient LOS. CONCLUSION: The TUG test is reliable and valid to assess group change of inpatients on an orthopaedic rehabilitation ward but is not a good predictor of LOS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis, level 1b.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(7):410-417, published online 22 February 2008. doi:10.519/jospt.2008.2657

KEY WORDS:  joint replacement, length of stay, outcome measure, TUG test