<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Jeffrey E. Johnson, MD]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/jeffreyejohnson</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://feedvalidator.org/docs/rss2.html</docs>
<generator>www.eResources.com (Generator)</generator>
<managingEditor>jospt@eresources.com (JOSPT)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jospt@eresources.com (eResources)</webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.asp" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.416/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.williammgeideman/author.asp">William M. Geideman</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffreyejohnson/author.asp">Jeffrey E. Johnson</a><br /><p><strong>Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction is the most common cause </strong>of acquired flatfoot deformity in adults. Although this term suggests pathology involving only the posterior tibial tendon, the disorder includes a spectrum of pathologic changes involving associated tendon, ligament, and joint structures of the ankle, hindfoot, and midfoot. Early recognition and treatment is the key to prevention of the debilitating, long-term consequences of this disorder. Conservative care is possible in the earliest stages, whereas surgical reconstruction and eventually arthrodeses become necessary in the latter stages. The purpose of this article is to review the symptoms, physical examination, radiological examination, classification, and treatment of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30(2):68-77. </p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> flatfoot, pes planovalgus, posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, tendinitis</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.416/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Effects of a Tendo-Achilles Lengthening Procedure on Muscle Function and Gait Characteristics in a Patient With Diabetes Mellitus</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.418/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.marykenthastings/author.asp">Mary Kent Hastings</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaeljmueller/author.asp">Michael J. Mueller</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidrsinacore/author.asp">David R. Sinacore</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.gretchenbsalsich/author.asp">Gretchen B. Salsich</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jackrengsberg/author.asp">Jack R. Engsberg</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffreyejohnson/author.asp">Jeffrey E. Johnson</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> Case report with repeated measures. <strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the effects of a tendo-Achilles lengthening (TAL) and total contact casting (TCC) on wound healing, motion, plantar pressure, and function in a patient with diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy, neuropathic ulcer, and limited dorsiflexion range of motion (DFROM). <strong>Background: </strong>Limited DFROM has been associated with increased forefoot pressures and skin breakdown. A TAL was expected to increase DFROM and reduce forefoot pressures during walking, but the influence on muscle performance and function was unknown. <strong>Methods and Measures: </strong>The patient was a 42-year-old man with a 20-year history of type 1 diabetes (NIDDM) and a recurrent neuropathic plantar ulcer. Outcome measures were DFROM, isokinetic plantar flexor muscle peak torque, in-shoe and barefoot peak plantar pressure, physical performance test (PPT) score, and peak ankle and hip moments during walking obtained from an automated gait analysis. All tests were completed pre-TAL, 8 weeks post-TAL (after immobilization in a TCC), and 7 months post-TAL. <strong>Results: </strong>The wound healed in 40 days. The TAL resulted in a sustained increase in DFROM (0 to 18&deg;). Plantar flexor peak torque was reduced by 21% 8 weeks after the TAL compared with the torque before surgery but recovered fully at 7 months. Seven months following TAL, in-shoe forefoot peak plantar pressure was reduced by 55%, barefoot pressure decreased by 14%, PPT score increased by 24%, peak ankle plantar flexor moment remained decreased by 30%, and the peak hip flexor moment increased by 41% during walking. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> For this patient, a TAL resulted in short-term deficits in peak plantar flexor torque, but a 7-month follow-up showed improvements in ankle DFROM, walking ability, and a decrease in forefoot in-shoe peak plantar pressure. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30(2):85-90. </p><p><strong>Key Words: </strong>dorsiflexion range of motion, peak plantar pressure, physical performance test, plantar flexor moment</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.418/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>

