<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Jeff R. Houck, PT, PhD]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/jeffrhouck</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://feedvalidator.org/docs/rss2.html</docs>
<generator>www.eResources.com (Generator)</generator>
<managingEditor>jospt@eresources.com (JOSPT)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jospt@eresources.com (eResources)</webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.asp" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Achilles Pain, Stiffness, and Muscle Power Deficits: Achilles Tendinitis</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2480/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.christopherrcarcia/author.asp">Christopher R. Carcia</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.robroylmartin/author.asp">RobRoy L. Martin</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffrhouck/author.asp">Jeff R. Houck</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.danekwukich/author.asp">Dane K. Wukich</a><br /><p>The Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association presents this sixth set of clinical practice guidelines on Achilles pain, stiffness, and muscle power deficits that are characteristic of Achilles Tendinitis. These clinical practice guidelines are linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The purpose of these practice guidelines is to describe evidence-based orthopaedic physical therapy clinical practice and provide recommendations for (1) examination and diagnostic classification based on body functions and body structures, activity limitations, and participation restrictions, (2) interventions provided by physical therapists, (3) and assessment of outcome for common musculoskeletal disorders.</p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010:40(9):A1-A26. doi:10.2519/jospt.2010.0305</em></p><p><strong><font color="#0099ff">KEY WORDS:</font></strong> APTA, clinical practice guidelines, ICD, ICF, Orthopaedic Section</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2480/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Choosing Among 3 Ankle-Foot Orthoses for a Patient With Stage II Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2361/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.christopherneville/author.asp">Christopher Neville</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffrhouck/author.asp">Jeff R. Houck</a><br /><p><font color="#990000"><strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong></font> Case report. <font color="#990000"><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong></font> No head-to-head comparisons of different orthoses for patients with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) have been performed to date. Additionally, the cost of orthoses varies considerably, thus choosing an effective orthosis that is affordable to the patient is largely a trial-and-error process. <font color="#990000"><strong>CASE DESCRIPTION:</strong></font> A 77-year-old woman was seen with complaints of abnormal foot posture (&#39;my foot is out&#39;), minimal medial foot and ankle pain, and a 3-year history of conservatively managed stage II PTTD. The patient was not able to complete 1 single-limb heel rise on the involved side, while she could complete 3 on the uninvolved side. Ankle strength testing revealed a mild to moderate loss of plantar flexor strength (20%-31% deficit on the involved side), combined with a 22% deficit in isometric ankle inversion and forefoot adduction strength. To assist this patient in managing her flatfoot posture and PTTD, 3 orthoses were considered: an off-the-shelf ankle-foot orthosis (AFO), a custom solid AFO, and a custom articulated AFO. The patient&#39;s chief complaint was partly cosmetic (&igrave;my foot is out&icirc;). As decreasing flatfoot kinematics may unload the tibialis posterior muscle, thus prevent the progression of foot deformity, the primary goal of orthotic intervention was to improve flatfoot kinematics. Given the difficulties in clinical approaches to evaluating flatfoot kinematics, a quantitative gait analysis, using a multisegment foot model, was used. <font color="#990000"><strong>OUTCOMES:</strong></font> In the frontal plane, all 3 orthoses were associated with small changes toward hindfoot inversion. In the sagittal plane, between 2.7&deg; and 6.1&deg;, greater forefoot plantar flexion (raising the medial longitudinal arch) occurred. There were no differences among the orthoses on hindfoot inversion and forefoot plantar flexion. In the transverse plane, the off-the-shelf design was associated with forefoot abduction, the custom solid orthosis was associated with no change, and the custom articulated orthosis was associated with forefoot adduction. <font color="#990000"><strong>DISCUSSION:</strong></font> Based on gait analysis, the higher-cost custom articulated orthosis was chosen as optimal for the patient. This custom articulated orthosis was associated with the greatest change in flatfoot deformity, assessed using gait analysis. The patient felt it produced the greatest correction in foot deformity. Reducing flatfoot deformity while allowing ankle movement may limit progression of stage II PTTD. <font color="#990000"><strong>LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:</strong></font> Therapy, level 4. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(11):816-824, Epub 15 October 2009. doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.3107 </em></p><p><font color="#990000"><strong>KEY WORDS:</strong></font> biomechanics, PTTD, tendinopathy</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2361/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Foot Kinematics During a Bilateral Heel Rise Test in Participants With Stage II Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2346/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffrhouck/author.asp">Jeff R. Houck</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.christopherneville/author.asp">Christopher Neville</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.joshtome/author.asp">Josh Tome</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.asamuelflemister/author.asp">A. Samuel Flemister</a><br /><p><font color="#000099"><strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong></font> Experimental laboratory study using a cross-sectional design. <font color="#000099"><strong>OBJECTIVES:</strong></font> To compare foot kinematics, using 3-dimensional tracking methods, during a bilateral heel rise between participants with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) and participants with a normal medial longitudinal arch (MLA). <font color="#000099"><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong></font> The bilateral heel rise test is commonly used to assess patients with PTTD; however, information about foot kinematics during the test is lacking. <font color="#000099"><strong>METHODS:</strong></font> Forty-five individuals volunteered to participate, including 30 patients diagnosed with unilateral stage II PTTD (mean &plusmn; SD age, 59.8 &plusmn; 11.1 years; body mass index, 29.9 &plusmn; 4.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and 15 controls (mean &plusmn; SD age, 56.5 &plusmn; 7.7 years; body mass index, 30.6 &plusmn; 3.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Footkinematic data were collected during a bilateral heel rise task from the calcaneus (hindfoot), first metatarsal, and hallux, using an Optotrak motion analysis system and Motion Monitor software. A 2-way mixed-effects analysis of variance model, with normalized heel height as a covariate, was used to test for significant differences between the normal MLA and PTTD groups. <font color="#000099"><strong>RESULTS:</strong></font> The patients in the PTTD group exhibited significantly greater ankle plantar flexion (mean difference between groups, 7.3&deg;; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.1&deg; to 9.5&deg;), greater first metatarsal dorsiflexion (mean difference between groups, 9.0&deg;; 95% CI: 3.7&deg; to 14.4&deg;), and less hallux dorsiflexion (mean difference, 6.7&deg;; 95% CI: 1.7&deg; to 11.8&deg;) compared to controls. At peak heel rise, hindfoot inversion was similar (<em>P</em> = .130) between the PTTD and control groups. <font color="#000099"><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong></font> Except for hindfoot eversion/inversion, the differences in foot kinematics in participants with stage II PTTD, when compared to the control group, mainly occur as an offset, not an alteration in shape, of the kinematic patterns. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(8):593-603. doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.3040</em></p><p><font color="#000099"><strong>KEY WORDS:</strong></font> ankle, flat foot, medial longitudinal arch, posterior tibialis</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2346/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Effects of the AirLift PTTD Brace on Foot Kinematics in Subjects With Stage II Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2298/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.christopherneville/author.asp">Christopher Neville</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.asamuelflemister/author.asp">A. Samuel Flemister</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffrhouck/author.asp">Jeff R. Houck</a><br /><strong><font color="#000099">STUDY DESIGN:</font>&nbsp;</strong>Experimental laboratory study.&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">OBJECTIVES: </font></strong>To investigate the effect of inflation of the air bladder component of the AirLift PTTD brace on relative foot kinematics in subjects with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD).&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">BACKGROUND:</font> </strong>Orthotic devices are commonly recommended in the conservative management of stage II PTTD to improve foot kinematics.&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">METHODS AND MEASURES:</font></strong><em>&nbsp;</em>Ten female subjects with stage II PTTD walked in the laboratory wearing the AirLift PTTD brace during 3 testing conditions (air bladder inflation to 0, 4, and 7 PSI [SI equivalent: 0, 27 579, and 48 263 Pa]). Kinematics were recorded from the tibia, calcaneus (hindfoot), and first metatarsal (forefoot), using an Optotrak motion analysis system. Comparisons were made between air bladder inflation and the 0-PSI condition for each of the dependent kinematic variables (hindfoot eversion, forefoot abduction, and forefoot dorsiflexion). <strong><font color="#000099">RESULTS: </font></strong>Greater hindfoot inversion was observed with air bladder inflation during the second rocker (mean, 1.7&deg;; range, &ndash;0.7&deg; to 6.1&deg;). Less consistent changes in forefoot plantar flexion and forefoot adduction occurred with air bladder inflation. The greatest change toward forefoot plantar flexion was observed during the third rocker (mean, 1.4&deg;; range, &ndash;3.8&deg; to 3.9&deg;). The greatest change towards adduction was observed during the third rocker (mean, 2.3&deg;; range, &ndash;3.4&deg; to 6.5&deg;).&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">CONCLUSIONS:</font></strong><em> </em>On average, the air bladder component of the AirLift PTTD brace was successful in reducing the amount of hindfoot eversion observed in subjects with stage II PTTD; however, the effect on forefoot motion was more variable. Some subjects tested had marked improvement in foot kinematics, while 2 subjects demonstrated negative results. Specific foot characteristics are hypothesized to explain these varied results. <p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(3):201-209,&nbsp;Epub 2 February 2009. doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.2908</em></p><strong><font color="#000099">KEY WORDS:</font></strong>&nbsp;biomechanics, orthotic device, tendinopathy]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2298/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comparison of Changes in Posterior Tibialis Muscle Length Between Subjects With Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction and Healthy Controls During Walking</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1320/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.christopherneville/author.asp">Christopher Neville</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.asamuelflemister/author.asp">A. Samuel Flemister</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.joshtome/author.asp">Josh Tome</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffrhouck/author.asp">Jeff R. Houck</a><br /><strong><font color="#000099">STUDY DESIGN:</font></strong> Case control study. <font color="#000099"><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong> </font>To compare posterior tibialis (PT) length between subjects with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) and healthy controls during the stance phase of gait. <strong><font color="#000099">BACKGROUND:</font></strong> The abnormal kinematics demonstrated by subjects with stage II PTTD are presumed to be associated with a lengthened PT musculotendon, but this relationship has not been fully explored. <strong><font color="#000099">METHODS AND MEASURES:</font></strong> Seventeen subjects with stage II PTTD and 10 healthy controls volunteered for this study. Subject-specific foot kinematics were collected using 3-D motion analysis techniques for input into a general model of PT musculotendon length (PTLength).&nbsp;The kinematic inputs included hindfoot eversion/inversion (HF Ev/Inv), forefoot abduction/adduction (FF Ab/Add), forefoot plantar flexion/dorsiflexion (FF Pf/Df), and ankle plantar flexion/dorsiflexion (Ankle Pf/Df).&nbsp;To estimate the change in PTLength from neutral the following was used: PTLength = 0.401(HF Ev/Inv) + 0.270(FF Ab/Add) + 0.137(FF Pf/Df) + 0.057(Ankle Pf/Df).&nbsp;Positive values indicated lengthening from the subtalar neutral (STN) position, while negative values indicated shortening relative to the STN position. A 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model was used to compare PTLength between groups across the stance phases of walking (loading response, midstance, terminal stance, and preswing).&nbsp;Also, a 2-way ANOVA was used to assess the foot kinematics that contributed to alterations in PTLength.&nbsp;The Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment Index and Mobility subscale were used to compare function and mobility. <strong><font color="#000099">RESULTS:</font></strong> PTLength was significantly greater (lengthened) relative to the STN position in the PTTD group compared to the control group across all phases of stance, with the greatest between-group&nbsp;difference in PTLength occurring during preswing.&nbsp;The greater PTLength in subjects with PTTD compared to controls was principally attributed to significantly greater HF Ev/Inv during loading response (<em>P</em>=.014) and midstance (<em>P</em>=.015). During terminal stance and preswing, each kinematic input to estimate PTLength contributed to lengthening (main effect, <em>P</em>=.03 and <em>P</em>=.01, respectively). Subjects with PTTD with abnormally greater PTLength reported significantly lower function (<em>P</em> = .04) and mobility (<em>P </em>= .03) compared to subjects with PTTD with normal PTLength during walking. <strong><font color="#000099">CONCLUSIONS:</font></strong>&nbsp;The greater PTLength, as<sub>&nbsp;</sub>determined from foot kinematics, suggests the PT musculotendon is lengthened in subjects with stage II PTTD, compared to healthy controls.&nbsp;The amount of lengthening is not dependent on the phase of gait; however, different foot kinematics contribute to PTLength across the stance phase. Targeting these foot kinematics may limit lengthening of the PT musculotendon. Subjects with excessive PT lengthening experience a decrease in function. <p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007;37(11):661-669, published online&nbsp;12 July 2007. doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2539</em></p><p><strong><font color="#000099">KEY WORDS:</font></strong>&nbsp; foot kinematics, pronation, tendinopathy, walking</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1320/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Influence of Anticipation on Movement Patterns in Subjects With ACL Deficiency Classified as Noncopers</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1191/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kennethedehaven/author.asp">Kenneth E. De Haven</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.mikemaloney/author.asp">Mike Maloney</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffrhouck/author.asp">Jeff R. Houck</a><br /><p><span style="font-family: Arial"><span><strong><font color="#000099">STUDY DESIGN:</font></strong> Two-factor, mixed experimental design. </span></span><span style="font-family: Arial"><span><strong><font color="#000099">OBJECTIVES:</font></strong> To compare movement patterns of subjects who are anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient and classified as noncopers to controls during early stance of anticipated and unanticipated straight and cutting tasks. </span></span><span style="font-family: Arial"><span><strong><font color="#000099">BACKGROUND:</font></strong> Altered neuromuscular control of subjects that are ACL deficient and noncoper theoretically influences movement patterns during unanticipated tasks. </span></span><span style="font-family: Arial"><span><strong><font color="#000099">METHODS AND MEASURES:</font></strong> </span><span style="font-family: Arial">The study included 16 subjects who are ACL deficient, classified as noncopers, and 20 healthy controls. Data were collected using an Optotrak Motion Analysis System and force plate integrated with Motion Monitor Software to generate knee joint angles, moments, and power. Each testing session included anticipated tasks, straight walking task (ST), and 45&deg; side-step cutting tasks (SSC), followed by a set of unexpected straight walking (STU) and unexpected sidestep cutting (SSCU) tasks in a random order. For all tasks speed was maintained at 2 m/s. Peak knee angle, moment, and power variables during early stance were compared using 2- way mixed-effects ANOVA models. </span></span><span style="font-family: Arial"><span><strong><font color="#000099">RESULTS:</font></strong> For both the straight and sidestep tasks, the noncoper group did not show a dependence on whether the task was anticipated or unanticipated (group-by-condition interaction) for the knee angle (straight, P = .067; side-step cutting, P = .103), moment (straight, P = .079; side-step cutting, P = .996), and powers (straight, P = .181; side-step cutting, P = .183) during the loading response phase. However, during both straight and side-step cutting tasks, the subjects in the noncoper group used significantly lower knee flexion angles (straight, P = .002; side-step cutting, P = .019), knee moments (straight, P = .005; sidestep cutting, P&lt;.001), and knee powers (straight, P = .013; side-step cutting, P&lt;.001). </span></span><span style="font-family: Arial"><span><strong><font color="#000099">CONCLUSIONS:</font></strong> </span><span style="font-family: Arial">This study suggests subjects that are ACL deficient and classified as noncopers use a common abnormal movement pattern of lower knee extensor loading even during unanticipated tasks.&nbsp;</span><span style="font-family: Arial">&nbsp;</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: Arial"><span style="font-family: Arial"></span><span style="font-family: Arial"><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(2):56-64.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2292</span><span style="font-family: Arial">&nbsp;</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: Arial"><span style="font-family: Arial"></span></span><span style="font-family: Arial"></span><span style="font-family: Arial"><strong><font color="#000099">KEY WORDS</font></strong></span><span style="font-family: Arial"><span><font color="#000099"><strong>:</strong></font> anterior cruciate ligament, cutting task, knee instability, neuromuscular control</span></span></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1191/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Self-Reported Giving-Way Episode During a Stepping-Down Task: Case Report of a Subject With an ACL-Deficient Knee</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.189/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.amylerner/author.asp">Amy Lerner</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidgushue/author.asp">David Gushue</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.hjohnyack/author.asp">H. John Yack</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffrhouck/author.asp">Jeff R. Houck</a><br /><strong>Study Design:</strong> Case report. <strong>Objective:</strong> To describe the knee kinematics and moments of a giving-way trial of a subject with an anterior-cruciate-ligament&ndash; (ACL) deficient knee relative to his non&ndash;giving-way trials and to healthy subjects during a step-down task. <strong>Background:</strong> Episodes of giving way are believed to damage joint structures, therefore treatments aim to prevent giving-way episodes, yet few studies document giving-way events. <strong>Methods:</strong> The giving-way trial experienced by a 32-year-old male subject with ACL deficiency during a step-down task was compared to his non&ndash;giving-way trials (n = 5) and data from healthy subjects (n = 20). Position data collected at 60 Hz were combined with anthropometric data and ground reaction force data collected at 300 Hz to estimate knee displacement and 3-dimensional angles and net joint moments. <strong>Results:</strong> The knee joint displacement was higher during the giving-way trial: from 4% to 32% of stance, reaching 9.0 mm at 18% of stance as compared to 1.6 &plusmn; 0.7 mm for the non&ndash;giving-way trials. After 4% of stance, the knee flexion angle of the giving-way trial was 6.6&deg; higher than the non&ndash;giving-way trials and was associated with a higher knee extension moment. The knee frontal plane moment was near neutral during early stance of the giving-way trial in contrast to the non-giving way and healthy subjects which demonstrated a knee abduction moment. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> The response of this subject to the giving-way event suggests that higher knee flexion angles may enhance knee stability and, in reaction to the giving-way event, that knee extension moment may increase. <p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(5):273-287.</em> </p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> anterior cruciate ligament, biomechanics, kinematics, knee instability</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.189/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Giving Way Event During a Combined Stepping and Crossover Cutting Task in an Individual With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.332/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.hjohnyack/author.asp">H. John Yack</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffrhouck/author.asp">Jeff R. Houck</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design: </strong>Case study. <strong>Objective: </strong>To compare knee kinematics and moments of nongiving way trials to a giving way trial during a combined stepping and crossover cutting activity. <strong>Background:</strong> The knee kinematics and moments associated with giving way episodes suggest motor control strategies that lead to instability and recovery of stability during movement. <strong>Methods and Measures: </strong>A 27-year-old woman with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency reported giving way while performing a combined stepping and crossover cutting activity. A motion analysis system recorded motion of the pelvis, femur, tibia, and foot using 3 infrared emitting diodes placed on each segment at 60 Hz. Force plate recordings at 300 Hz were combined with limb inertial properties and position data to estimate net knee joint moments. The stance time, foot progression angle, and cutting angle were also included to evaluate performance between trials. <strong>Results: </strong>Knee internal rotation during the giving way trial increased 3.2&deg; at 54% of stance relative to the nongiving way trials. Knee flexion during the giving way trial increased to 33.1&deg; at 66% of stance, and the knee moment switched from a nominal flexor moment to a knee extensor moment at 64% of stance. The knee abductor moment and external rotation moment during the giving way trial deviated in early stance. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>The observed response to the giving way event suggests that increasing knee flexion may enhance knee stability for this subject. The transverse and frontal plane moments appear important in contributing to the giving way event. Further research that assists clinicians in understanding how interventions can impact control of movements in these planes is necessary. </p><p>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001;31(9):481-495. </p><p><strong>Key Words: </strong>anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, kinematics, knee kinetics</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.332/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Knee and Hip Angle and Moment Adaptations During Cutting Tasks in Subjects With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency Classified as Noncopers</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.707/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.andrewduncan/author.asp">Andrew Duncan</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kennethedehaven/author.asp">Kenneth E. De Haven</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffrhouck/author.asp">Jeff R. Houck</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> Two-factor mixed-design study, with factors including group (control and noncoper) and task (sidestep, crossover, and straight). <strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the knee and hip joint angles and moments of control subjects and subjects with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient knee classified as noncopers, during a sidestep, crossover, and straight-ahead task. <strong>Background: </strong>Subjects with ACL deficiency primarily note difficulty with cutting tasks as opposed to straight-ahead tasks. Yet, previous studies have primarily focused on straight-ahead tasks. <strong>Methods and Measures: </strong>Fifteen subjects with ACL deficiency classified as noncopers, based on the number of giving-way episodes (&gt;1) and global question of knee function (&lt;60%), were included in this study. These subjects (10 male, 5 female; age range, 18-49 years) were compared to a healthy control group (7 male, 7 female; age range, 19-47 years). Position data collected at 60 Hz were combined with anthropometric and ground reaction force data collected at 420 Hz to estimate 3-dimensional knee and hip joint angles and moments. All subjects performed 3 tasks including a step and 45&deg; sidestep cut, step and 45&deg; crossover cut, and step and proceed straight. Two-way mixed-model ANOVAs were used to compare peak angle and moment variables between 10% to 30% of stance. <strong>Results: </strong>The ACL-deficient noncoper group had 1.8&deg; to 5.7&deg; less knee flexion angle compared to the control group across tasks (P&lt;.043). The ACL-deficient noncoper group used 22% to 27% lower knee extensor moment during weight acceptance compared to the control group (P&lt;.001). The sagittal plane hip extensor moments were 34% to 39% higher in the ACL-deficient noncoper group compared to the control group (P&lt;.025). Hip frontal (P&lt;.037) and transverse plane (P&lt;.04) moments also distinguished the ACL-deficient noncoper from the control group. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> This study suggests that individuals who do not cope well after ACL injury rely on a hip control strategy during cutting tasks. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(8):531-540.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2005.1763</p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> ACL, biomechanics, knee stability<br /></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.707/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comparison of Foot Kinematics Between Subjects With Posterior Tibialis Tendon Dysfunction and Healthy Controls</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1160/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.joshtome/author.asp">Josh Tome</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.deborahanawoczenski/author.asp">Deborah A. Nawoczenski</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.asamuelflemister/author.asp">A. Samuel Flemister</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jeffrhouck/author.asp">Jeff R. Houck</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design: </strong>A 2 &times; 4 mixed-design ANOVA with a fixed factor of group (posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction [PTTD] and asymptomatic controls), and a repeated factor of phase of stance (loading response, midstance, terminal stance, and preswing).<br /><strong>Objective:</strong> To compare 3-dimensional stance period kinematics (rearfoot eversion/inversion, medial longitudinal arch [MLA] angle, and forefoot abduction) of subjects with stage II PTTD to asymptomatic controls.<br /><strong>Background: </strong>Abnormal foot postures in subjects with stage II PTTD are clinical indicators of disease progression, yet dynamic investigations of forefoot, midfoot, and rearfoot kinematic deviations in this population are lacking.<br /><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen subjects with stage II PTTD were compared to 10 control subjects with normal arch index values. Subjects were matched for age, gender, and body mass index. A 5-segment, kinematic model of the leg and foot was tracked using an Optotrak Motion Analysis System. The dependent kinematic variables were rearfoot inversion/eversion, forefoot abduction/adduction, and the MLA angle. An ANOVA model was used to compare kinematic variables between groups across 4 phases of stance.<br /><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects with PTTD demonstrated significantly greater rearfoot eversion (P = .042), MLA angle (P = .008) and forefoot abduction angles (P&lt;.005) during specific phases of stance. Subjects with PTTD demonstrated significantly greater rearfoot eversion (P&lt;.004) and MLA angles (P&lt;.009) by 6.2&deg; and 8.0&deg;, respectively, during loading response when compared to controls. During preswing, the subjects with PTTD demonstrated a significantly greater MLA angle (P&lt;.002) and a forefoot abduction angle (P&lt;.001) which exceeded that of the controls by 10.0&deg;.<br /><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The abnormal kinematics observed at the rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot across all phases of stance implicate a failure of compensatory muscle and secondary ligamentous support to control foot kinematics in subjects with stage II PTTD. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(9):635-644.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2293</p><p><strong>Key Words: </strong>biomechanics, foot kinematics, tendinopathy, tendonitis</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1160/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>

