Study Design: Single-case A1-B-A2 design. Objective: To determine if manual physical therapy, therapeutic exercise, and patient education would be an effective management strategy for a patient with a disc displacement without reduction of both temporomandibular joints. Background: A number of conservative management strategies have been proposed for the treatment of temporomandibular disorders. However, little evidence exists to indicate the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions in patients with bilateral disc displacement without reduction. Methods and Measures: Phase A1 of the study consisted of a baseline condition in which no intervention was initiated. Phase B included manual physical therapy, therapeutic exercise, and patient education focusing on the temporomandibular joint and cervical spine. Phase A2 consisted of withdrawal of the intervention. The Steigerwald/Maher disability questionnaire was used to collect data relative to function. A visual analog scale was used to collect pain data and maximal mouth opening measurements were obtained as an indicator of range of motion. Visual analysis and the 2 standard deviation band method of statistical analysis were used to compare data. Results: Following the implementation of the intervention phase, the patient demonstrated significant reductions in pain and improvements in maximal mouth opening and function as measured by the Steigerwald/Maher disability questionnaire. These observed improvements were maintained at the time of a 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that manual physical therapy, therapeutic exercise, and patient education may have been an effective management strategy for a patient with bilateral disc displacement without reduction of the temporomandibular joints. Further outcome studies in the form of randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the clinical utility of this treatment approach in a larger population.

J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2004;34(9):535-548. doi:10.2519/jospt.2004.1508

Key Words: jaw, maximal mouth opening, orofacial pain, temporomandibular disorder

Study Design: A case series of consecutive patients with cervical radiculopathy. Background: A multitude of physical therapy interventions have been proposed to be effective in the management of cervical radiculopathy. However, outcome studies using consistent treatment approaches on a well-defined sample of patients are lacking. The purpose of this case series is to describe the outcomes of a consecutive series of patients presenting to physical therapy with cervical radiculopathy and managed with the use of manual physical therapy, cervical traction, and strengthening exercises. Case Description: Eleven consecutive patients (mean age, 51.7 years; SD, 8.2) who presented with cervical radiculopathy on the initial examination were treated with a standardized approach, including manual physical therapy, cervical traction, and strengthening exercises of the deep neck flexors and scapulothoracic muscles. At the initial evaluation all patients completed self-report measures of pain and function, including a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). All patients again completed the outcome measures, in addition to the global rating of change (GROC), at the time of discharge from therapy and at a 6-month follow-up session. Outcomes: Ten of the 11 patients (91%) demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in pain and function following a mean of 7.1 (SD, 1.5) physical therapy visits and at the 6-month follow-up. Discussion: Ninety-one percent (10 of 11) of patients with cervical radiculopathy in this case series improved, as defined by the patients classifying their level of improvement as at least ‘‘quite a bit better’’ on the GROC. However, because a cause-and-effect relationship cannot be inferred from a case series, follow-up randomized clinical trials should be performed to further investigate the effectiveness of manual physical therapy, cervical traction, and strengthening exercises in a homogeneous group of patients with cervical radiculopathy.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(12):802-811. doi:10.2519/jospt.2005.2077

Key Words: cervical spine, manipulation, mobilization, thoracic spine

Study Design: A case series of patients with low back pain (LBP) who satisfy a clinical prediction rule (CPR).

Background: A CPR that identifies patients with LBP who are likely to respond with rapid and prolonged reductions in pain and disability following spinal manipulation was developed and recently validated. The CPR developed to predict favorable response to manipulation investigated the effects of only 1 manipulation technique. The accuracy of the CPR for predicting outcomes using other manipulation techniques is not known. The purpose of the case series was to describe the outcomes of patients presenting to physical therapy with LBP who met the CPR and were treated with an alternative lumbar manipulation technique.

Case Description: Consecutive patients referred to physical therapy who satisfied the eligibility criteria, including the presence of at least 4 of the 5 criteria on the CPR, were invited to participate in the case series. Patients were treated for 2 visits with a side-lying lumbar manipulation technique, followed by a basic range of motion exercise. Patients who exhibited a 50% reduction or greater in disability, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were considered to have experienced a successful outcome.

Outcomes: A total of 12 patients participated in the case series. The mean age of the group was 39 years (SD, 8.9 years) and the median duration of symptoms was 19 days (range, 8-148 days). Of the 12 patients who participated in this case series, the mean reduction in disability as measured with the ODI was 57% (SD, 9%). Only 1 patient did not surpass the 50% reduction in ODI scores.Discussion: Eleven of the 12 patients (92%) in this case series who satisfied the CPR and were treated with an alternative lumbar manipulation technique demonstrated a successful outcome in 2 visits. It is plausible that patients with LBP who satisfy the CPR may obtain a successful outcome with either manipulation technique directed at the lumbopelvic region.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(4):209-214, doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2163.

Key Words: low back pain, manual therapy, physical therapy