<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Kevin D. Harris, PT, DSc]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/kevindharris</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://feedvalidator.org/docs/rss2.html</docs>
<generator>www.eResources.com (Generator)</generator>
<managingEditor>jospt@eresources.com (JOSPT)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jospt@eresources.com (eResources)</webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.asp" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Disruption of a Patellar Tendon Repair</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2790/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevindharris/author.asp">Kevin D. Harris</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.gailddeyle/author.asp">Gail D. Deyle</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.liemtbuimansfield/author.asp">Liem T. Bui-Mansfield</a><br /><p>The patient was a 38-year-old man evaluated by a physical therapist 14 weeks after repair of the left patellar tendon. The physical therapist requested radiographs, which revealed findings consistent with a patellar tendon retear. The radiologist recommended further evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging, which showed a left patellar tendon tear. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(8):738. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.0414 </em></p><p><font color="#cc6600"><strong>KEY WORDS:</strong></font> knee, lower extremity, patella, magnetic resonance imaging, radiography</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2790/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Manual Physical Therapy for Injection-Confirmed Nonacute Acromioclavicular Joint Pain</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2655/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevindharris/author.asp">Kevin D. Harris</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.gailddeyle/author.asp">Gail D. Deyle</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.normanwgill/author.asp">Norman W. Gill</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.robertrhowes/author.asp">Robert R. Howes</a><br /><p><font color="#000099"><strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong></font> Prospective single-cohort study. <font color="#000099"><strong>OBJECTIVES:</strong></font> To determine and document changes in pain and disability in patients with primary, nonacute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) pain treated with a manual therapy approach. <font color="#000099"><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong></font> To our knowledge, there are no published studies on the physical therapy management of nonacute ACJ pain. Manual physical therapy has been successful in the treatment of other shoulder conditions. <font color="#000099"><strong>METHODS:</strong></font> The chief inclusion criterion was greater than 50% pain relief with an ACJ diagnostic injection. Patients were excluded if they had sustained an ACJ injury within the previous 12 months. Treatment was conducted utilizing a manual physical therapy approach that addressed all associated impairments in the shoulder girdle and cervicothoracic spine. The primary outcome measure was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Secondary measures were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon and global rating of change scales. Outcomes were collected at baseline, 4 weeks, and 6 months. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon scale values were analyzed with a repeated-measures analysis of variance. <font color="#000099"><strong>RESULTS:</strong></font> Thirteen patients (11 male; mean &plusmn; SD age, 41.1 &plusmn; 9.6 years) completed treatment consisting of an average of 6.4 sessions. Compared to baseline, there was a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index at 4 weeks (<em>P</em> = .001; mean, 25.9 points; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.9, 39.8) and 6 months (<em>P</em>&lt;.001; mean, 29.8 points; 95% CI: 16.5, 43.0), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon scale at 4 weeks (<em>P</em>&lt;.001; mean, 27.9 points; 95% CI: 14.7, 41.1) and 6 months (<em>P</em>&lt;.001; mean, 32.6 points; 95% CI: 21.2, 43.9). <font color="#000099"><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong></font> Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements were observed in all outcome measures at 4 weeks and 6 months, following a short series of manual therapy interventions. These results, in a small cohort of patients, suggest the efficacy of this treatment approach but need to be verified by a randomized controlled trial. <font color="#000099"><strong>LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:</strong></font> Therapy, level 4. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012:42(2):66-80, Epub 25 October 2011. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3866</em></p><p><font color="#000099"><strong>KEY WORDS:</strong></font> distal clavicle excision, manipulation, mobilization, Mumford, shoulder</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2655/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>
