<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Kim H&#233;bert-Losier, PT]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/kimhebertlosier</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://feedvalidator.org/docs/rss2.html</docs>
<generator>www.eResources.com (Generator)</generator>
<managingEditor>jospt@eresources.com (JOSPT)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jospt@eresources.com (eResources)</webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.asp" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>December 2011 Letters to the Editor-in-Chief</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2679/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.robertferrari/author.asp">Robert Ferrari</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidmwalton/author.asp">David M. Walton</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.douglasmwhite/author.asp">Douglas M. White</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jackielwhittaker/author.asp">Jackie L. Whittaker</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.mariastokes/author.asp">Maria Stokes</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.damienhowell/author.asp">Damien Howell</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kimhebertlosier/author.asp">Kim Hébert-Losier</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.anthonygschneiders/author.asp">Anthony G. Schneiders</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.sjohnsullivan/author.asp">S. John Sullivan</a><br /><p>Letters to the Editor-in-Chief of <em>JOSPT</em> as follows:</p><ul><li>&quot;Early Prognostic Factors in Patients With Whiplash&quot; and Author&#39;s Response </li><li>&quot;Staying Current in the Use of Ultrasound Imaging&quot; and Author&#39;s Response</li><li>&quot;Differentiating the Soleus From the Gastrocnemius With the Heel Raise Test&quot; and Author&#39;s Response</li></ul><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41(12):983-987. doi:10.2519/jospt.2011.0202 </em></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2679/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Analysis of Knee Flexion Angles During 2 Clinical Versions of the Heel Raise Test to Assess Soleus and Gastrocnemius Function</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2560/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kimhebertlosier/author.asp">Kim Hébert-Losier</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.anthonygschneiders/author.asp">Anthony G. Schneiders</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.sjohnsullivan/author.asp">S. John Sullivan</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.richardjnewshamwest/author.asp">Richard J. Newsham-West</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.joseagarcia/author.asp">José A. García</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.guygsimoneau/author.asp">Guy G. Simoneau</a><br /><p><font color="#000099"><strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong></font> Controlled laboratory study, using a repeated-measures, counterbalanced design. <font color="#000099"><strong>OBJECTIVES:</strong></font> To provide estimates on the average knee angle maintained, absolute knee angle error, and total repetitions performed during 2 versions of the heel raise test. <font color="#000099"><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong></font> The heel raise test is performed in knee extension (EHRT) to assess gastrocnemius and knee flexion (FHRT) for soleus. However, it has not yet been determined whether select knee angles are maintained or whether total repetitions differ between the clinical versions of the heel raise test. <font color="#000099"><strong>METHODS:</strong></font> Seventeen healthy males and females performed maximal heel raise repetitions in 0&deg; (EHRT) and 30&deg; (FHRT) of desired knee flexion. The average angle maintained and absolute error at the knee during the 2 versions, and total heel raise repetitions, were measured using motion analysis. Participants&rsquo; kinematic measures were fitted into a generalized estimation equation model to provide estimates on EHRT and FHRT performance applicable to the general population. <font color="#000099"><strong>RESULTS:</strong></font> The model estimates that average angles of 2.2&deg; and 30.7&deg; will be maintained at the knee by the general population during the EHRT and the FHRT, with an absolute angle error of 3.4&deg; and 2.5&deg;, respectively. In both versions, 40 repetitions should be completed. However, the average angles maintained by participants ranged from &ndash;6.3&deg; to 21.6&deg; during the EHRT and from 22.0&deg; to 43.0&deg; during the FHRT, with the highest absolute errors in knee position being 25.9&deg; and 33.5&deg;, respectively. <font color="#000099"><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong></font> On average, select knee angles will be maintained by the general population during the select heel raise test versions, but individualized performance is variable and total repetitions do not distinguish between versions. Clinicians should, therefore, interpret select heel raise test outcomes with caution when used to respectively assess and rehabilitate soleus and gastrocnemius function. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41(7):505-513, Epub 18 February 2011. doi:10.2519/jospt.2011.3489</em> </p><p><font color="#000099"><strong>KEY WORDS:</strong></font> Achilles tendon, ankle, triceps surae</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2560/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>

