<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Laura E. Gibbons,  PhD]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/lauraegibbons</link>
<description></description>
<language></language>
<copyright></copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs></docs>
<generator></generator>
<managingEditor></managingEditor>
<webMaster></webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Isometric Back Extension Endurance Testing: Reasons for Test Termination</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.698/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.anninaropponen/author.asp">Annina Ropponen</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.lauraegibbons/author.asp">Laura E. Gibbons</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.tapiovideman/author.asp">Tapio Videman</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michelecbattie/author.asp">Michele C. Battié</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study. <strong>Objective: </strong>The self-reported reasons for terminating isometric back extension endurance testing and their associations with test performance and other factors were investigated to gain insight into determinants of test performance. <strong>Background: </strong>Factors limiting isometric back extension endurance performance remain unclear. Better understanding the reasons for termination of isometric extension endurance testing could provide insights into what the test actually reflects. <strong>Methods and Measures:</strong> Lifetime work, leisure activities and back pain questionnaire data, isometric back extension endurance testing (holding time, as measured in seconds), and reasons for test termination were obtained for a population-based sample of 544 working-age men. <strong>Results: </strong>The most common reason for test termination was fatigue (62.5%), followed by pain in various parts of the lower extremities (12.6% ) and back (3.2% ). A history of daily low back pain over the prior 12 months and greater pain intensity of the worst back pain episode over the same period were associated with a greater likelihood of termination due to back pain. In a regression analysis, longer holding time was associated with stopping due to fatigue rather than low back pain, with a trend of 19 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI], -2-40) longer holding time. After controlling for low back pain history, those previously involved in competitive sports were 2.6 times more likely to stop due to pain. Those with a competitive sport history had 14 seconds (95% CI, 5-23) greater holding time than those without such a history. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>Isometric back extension endurance testing is most commonly reported to be terminated due to muscle-related capacity as indicated by fatigue. Back pain is more likely to decrease performance time in men with a history of significant (frequent, intense) low back symptoms. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(7):437-442.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2005.2007</p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> fatigue, low back pain, lumbar spine, muscle</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.698/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>
