<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Louise A. Baur, MD, PhD]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/louiseabaur</link>
<description></description>
<language></language>
<copyright></copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs></docs>
<generator></generator>
<managingEditor></managingEditor>
<webMaster></webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>The Use of Ultrasound Imaging to Measure Midfoot Plantar Fat Pad Thickness in Children</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1316/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.dianelriddifordharland/author.asp">Diane L. Riddiford-Harland</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.juliersteele/author.asp">Julie R. Steele</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.louiseabaur/author.asp">Louise A. Baur</a><br /><p><font color="#000099"><strong>STUDY DESIGN<font color="#000099">:</font></strong></font><font color="#000099"> </font>Descriptive and reliability study. <strong><font color="#000099">OBJECTIVES:</font></strong> To design a reliable imaging method to quantify the thickness of the medial midfoot plantar fat pad in the feet of young children and to determine any between-foot (right versus left) differences in thickness. <strong><font color="#000099">BACKGROUND:</font></strong>&nbsp;Before we can establish whether persistent fat padding in the medial midfoot or a structural collapse of the longitudinal arch is the mechanism of flatter footprints displayed by obese children, a reliable method to quantify midfoot plantar fat pad thickness in children is required. <strong><font color="#000099">METHODS AND MEASURES:</font></strong>&nbsp;A portable ultrasound imaging system was used to quantify medial midfoot plantar fat pad thickness for the right and left foot of 14 healthy children (mean &plusmn; SD:&nbsp;3.8 &plusmn; 0.8 years) using 3 different measurement techniques.&nbsp;Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of the measurement (SEM) were calculated to assess intrarater reliability of these measurement techniques. <strong><font color="#000099">RESULTS:</font></strong>&nbsp;Medial midfoot plantar fat pad thickness (method 1, right foot) ranged from 3.1 to 4.9 mm.&nbsp;Similar values were observed for methods 2 and 3.&nbsp;The ICC values (0.82-0.94) and SEM values (0.12-0.23 mm) suggested that all 3 methods provided good reliability.&nbsp;Based on an ANOVA model, there was no significant interaction and no significant main effect for side, method, or day between the measurement techniques. <font color="#000099"><strong>CONCLUSIONS</strong><strong>:</strong></font>&nbsp;We found ultrasonography to be a reliable field tool to quantify medial midfoot plantar fat pad thickness in children.&nbsp;Although there was no difference in reliability across the 3 measurement techniques, the technique in which the transducer was placed directly beneath the dorsal-navicular landmark was the most time-efficient procedure to measure the thickness of the midfoot plantar fat pad in young children.&nbsp; </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(10):644-647,&nbsp;published online 20 June 2007.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2504</p><p><strong><font color="#000099">KEY WORDS:</font></strong> fat padding, feet, infants, sonography, ultrasonography</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1316/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>
