STUDY DESIGN: Observational. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of spinal decompression procedures performed during a clinical exam on low back pain (LBP) symptoms. BACKGROUND: Not all patients report an immediate or complete improvement in symptoms when the direction of lumbar motion or alignment is corrected according to principles of the movement system impairment (MSI) model. Axial compression of the spine may be responsible for the remaining symptoms. METHODS: Seventy subjects (mean ± SD age, 41.9 ± 11.5 years; 38 females, 32 males) with chronic LBP were evaluated using a standardized MSI exam. Seven tests assessing the effects of spinal decompression on LBP were added to the exam if the subjects’ symptoms were not alleviated with typical standardized corrections of movement and alignment. For each test of decompression, subjects reported their symptoms compared to a reference movement or position. RESULTS: When decompression was performed during lateral bending to the right and left, 21 of 21 (100%) and 16 of 20 (80%) subjects, respectively, reported an improvement. When traction was applied to subjects in right and left sidelying, 6 of 11 (55%) and 7 of 9 (78%), respectively, reported an improvement. When patients performed a push-up in sitting, 36 of 51 (71%) reported an improvement. In subjects who had symptoms in unsupported sitting, 41 of 57 (72%) reported an improvement in supported sitting. In subjects who reported symptoms in standing, 33 of 47 (70%) reported an improvement in hook-lying. CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic LBP consistently reported an improvement in symptoms with tests proposed to decrease the axial load on the spine. These tests are a quick and effective way to assess the contribution of axial decompression to LBP symptoms and potentially could be used as part of the plan of care.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(2):105-113, Epub 25 October 2011. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3724

KEY WORDS: axial loading, distraction, lumbar spine, traction

The Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association presents this third set of clinical practice guidelines on hip osteoarthritis, linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The purpose of these practice guidelines is to describe evidence-based orthopaedic physical therapy clinical practice and provide recommendations for (1) examination and diagnostic classification based on body functions and body structures, activity limitations, and participation restrictions, (2) prognosis, (3) interventions provided by physical therapists, and (4) assessment of outcome for common musculoskeletal disorders.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(4):A1-A25. doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.0301

KEY WORDS: APTA, clinical practice guidelines, ICD, ICF, Orthopaedic Section

STUDY DESIGN: Case report. BACKGROUND: Selecting the most effective conservative treatment for knee pain continues to be a challenge. An understanding of the underlying movement system impairment that is thought to contribute to the knee pain may assist in determining the most effective treatment. Our case report describes the treatment and outcomes of a patient with the proposed movement system impairment (MSI) diagnosis of tibiofemoral rotation. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was a 50-year-old female with a 3-month history of left anteromedial knee pain. Her knee pain was aggravated with sitting, standing, and descending stairs. A standardized clinical examination was performed and the MSI diagnosis of tibiofemoral rotation was determined. The patient consistently reported an increase in pain with activities that produced abnormal motions or alignments of the lower extremity in the frontal and transverse planes. The patient was educated to modify symptom-provoking functional activities by restricting the abnormal motions and alignments of the lower extremity. Exercises were prescribed to address impairments of muscle length, muscle strength, and motor control proposed to contribute to the tibiofemoral rotation. Tape also was applied to the knee in an attempt to restrict tibiofemoral rotation. OUTCOMES: The patient reported a cessation of pain and an improvement in her functional activities that occurred with correction of her knee alignment and movement pattern. Pain intensity was 2/10 at 1 week. At 10 weeks, pain intensity was 0/10 and the patient reported no limitations in sitting, standing, or descending stairs. The patient's score on the activities of daily living scale increased from 73% at the initial visit to 86% at 10 weeks and 96% at 1 year after therapy was discontinued. DISCUSSION: This case report presented a patient with knee pain and an MSI diagnosis of tibiofemoral rotation. Diagnosis-specific treatment resulted in a cessation of the patient's pain and an improved ability to perform functional activities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 4.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(4):203-213, published online 21 November 2007. doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2584

KEY WORDS: classification, functional activities, rehabilitation