Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Norman W. Gill, PT, DSc, OCS, FAAOMPT

Characterization of Lateral Abdominal Muscle Thickness in Persons With Lower Extremity Amputations

Barbara A. Springer, Norman W. Gill
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVES: To describe bilateral thickness of the lateral abdominal muscles at baseline and during an abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) in individuals with unilateral transtibial (TTA) or transfemoral (TFA) amputations. BACKGROUND: Although side-to-side symmetry of lateral abdominal muscles thickness has been established in healthy individuals, the degree of symmetry in those with unilateral lower extremity amputations remains unknown. Differences in lateral abdominal muscle thickness may exist based on prior findings of asymmetry and differences measured based on level of amputation in both the size and function of the iliopsoas and back extensor muscles. METHODS AND MEASURES: Seventy patients (69 males, 1 female) with traumatic unilateral lower extremity amputations (TTA, n = 39; TFA, n = 31) received a rehabilitative ultrasound imaging examination. Absolute thickness of the transversus abdominis (TrA) and the external and internal oblique muscles combined (EO+IO) were assessed bilaterally at baseline and during the ADIM. Symmetry was assessed using relative muscle thickness values at baseline. Percent increase in muscle thickness during the ADIM was used to investigate muscle function. Separate 2-by-2 mixed-model ANOVAs were used to compare both within-group (side of amputation versus nonamputated side) and between-group (TTA versus TFA) differences for thickness and function of the TrA and the EO+IO muscles. RESULTS: On the side of the amputation, the relative baseline thickness of the EO+IO measurement was greater (P<.05), while the relative baseline thickness of the TrA muscle was smaller (P<.05). But the mean differences side to side were small (1.3%) and unlikely to be clinically significant. Further, there were no differences in baseline muscle thickness between groups for the TrA (P = .95) or the EO+IO (P = .94) muscles. For thickness measurements during the ADIM, the TrA showed no side-to-side (P = .74) or group (P = .07) differences. Similarly, no side-to-side (P = .60) or group (P = .09) differences were found in the EO+IO thickness during the ADIM. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of retrospective review, these findings provide an initial reference data set for future studies. Bilateral symmetry of the lateral abdominal wall muscle thicknesses at baseline and during the ADIM for those with unilateral lower extremity amputations is comparable to healthy individuals. Future studies should consider the potential influences of low back pain and gait training on symmetry of muscle thickness and muscle function based on level of amputation.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(10):635-643, published online 29 August 2007. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2532

KEY WORDS: rehabilitative ultrasound imaging, sonography, transfemoral, transtibial, transversus abdominis

Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging of the Abdominal Muscles

Norman W. Gill, Julie A. Hides, Jackie L. Whittaker, Sharon M. Henry, Deydre S. Teyhen, Paul W. Hodges

Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) of the abdominal muscles is increasingly being used in the management of conditions involving musculoskeletal dysfunctions associated with the abdominal muscles, including certain types of low back and pelvic pain. This commentary provides an overview of current concepts and evidence related to RUSI of the abdominal musculature, including issues addressing the potential role of ultrasound imaging in the assessment and training of these muscles. Both quantitative and qualitative aspects associated with clinical and research applications are considered, as are the possible limitations related to the interpretation of measurements made with RUSI. Research to date has utilized a range of methodological approaches, including different transducer placements and imaging techniques. The pros and cons of the various methods are discussed, and guidelines for future investigations are presented. Potential implications and opportunities for clinical use of RUSI to enhance evidence-based practice are outlined, as are suggestions for future research to further clarify the possible role of RUSI in the evaluation and treatment of abdominal muscular morphology and function.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007:37(8):450-466; published online 30 May 2007. doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2558

KEY WORDS: morphometry, obliquus internus abdominis, rectus abdominis, sonography, transversus abdominis

Improved Activation of Lumbar Multifidus Following Spinal Manipulation: A Case Report Applying Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging

Alexander Karl Brenner, Kyle B. Kiesel, Norman W. Gill, Christopher J. Buscema

STUDY DESIGN: Case report. BACKGROUND: The use of spinal manipulation as a treatment to facilitate neuromuscular control of the paraspinal musculature is not well described in the literature. The use of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) may offer a convenient way to investigate and document possible changes occurring in the lumbar multifidus associated with manipulation intervention. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was a 33-year-old male with a 21-year history of low back pain and left posterior thigh pain who presented with lumbar hypomobility and met a previously published clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulation. During examination, the patient was asked to perform a prone upper extremity lifting task to assess activation in the lumbar multifidus during an automatic task. Through palpation, the examiner noted a decreased contraction of the left multifidus between L4-S1 compared to the right. To explore this further, a decision was made to assess the multifidus with RUSI, which confirmed the activation deficit noted during palpation. A lumbar regional manipulation was performed with the intention of reducing spinal hypomobility and assessing changes in multifidus activation. Imaging of the multifidus muscles at the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels were obtained premanipulation, immediately postmanipulation, and 1 day after manipulation. OUTCOMES: An increased ability to thicken the multifidus during a prone upper extremity lifting task was noted immediately and 1 day after manipulation. Average percent change in thickness at the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels with the prone arm lift was 3.6% premanipulation, 17.2% immediately postmanipulation, and 20.6% approximately 24 hours postmanipulation. Improvements in the thickening of the multifidus muscle during the upper extremity lifting task were greater than 3 standard errors of the measurement. Other changes included immediate palpable improvement in the contraction of the multifidus during the upper extremity lifting task, along with the patient report of increased ease of lifting. DISCUSSION: In this case report we quantified the short-term influence of spinal manipulation on multifidus muscular activation using RUSI. No cause-and-effect claims can be made; however, the results provide preliminary evidence to suggest that spinal manipulation may influence multifidus muscle function. RUSI offers a convenient way to investigate and document these changes.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(10):613-619, published online 29 May 2007. doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2470

KEY WORDS: motor control, reflexogenic, sonography