The Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) has an ongoing effort to create evidence-based practice guidelines for orthopaedic physical therapy management of patients with musculoskeletal impairments described in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The purpose of these clinical practice guidelines is to describe the peer-reviewed literature and make recommendations related to adhesive capsulitis.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013;43(5):A1-A31. doi:10.2519/jospt.2013.0302

KEY WORDS: clinical practice guidelines, frozen shoulder, ICD, ICF, Orthopaedic Section

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To assess scapular kinematics and electromyographic signal amplitude of the shoulder musculature, before and after thoracic spine manipulation (TSM) in subjects with rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT). Changes in range of motion, pain, and function were also assessed. BACKGROUND: There are various treatment techniques for RCT. Recent studies suggest that TSM may be a useful component in the management of pain and dysfunction associated with RCT. METHODS: Thirty subjects between 18 and 45 years of age, who showed signs of RCT, participated in this study. Changes in scapular kinematics and muscle activity, as well as changes in shoulder pain and function, were assessed pre-TSM and post-TSM using paired t tests and repeated-measures analyses of variance. RESULTS: TSM did not lead to changes in range of motion or scapular kinematics, with the exception of a small decrease in scapular upward rotation (P = .05). The only change in muscle activity was a small but significant increase in middle trapezius activity (P = .03). After TSM, subjects demonstrated decreased pain during performance of the Jobe empty-can (mean ± SD change, 2.6 ± 1.1), Neer (2.6 ± 1.3), and Hawkins-Kennedy (2.8 ± 1.3) tests (all, P<.001). Subjects also reported decreased pain with shoulder flexion (mean ± SD change, 2.0 ± 1.5; P<.001) and improved shoulder function (force production, 2.5 ± 1.4 kg; Penn Shoulder Score, 7.7 ± 9.4; sports/performing arts module of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, 16.4 ± 13.2) (all, P<.001). CONCLUSION: Immediate improvements in shoulder pain and function post-TSM are not likely explained by alterations in scapular kinematics or shoulder muscle activity. For people with pain associated with RCT, TSM may be an effective component of their treatment plan to improve pain and function. However, further randomized controlled studies are necessary to better validate this treatment approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 4.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(12):1005-1016, Epub 17 August 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.4142

KEY WORDS: joint mobilization, manual therapy, scapula, shoulder impingement

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of the modified scapular assistance test (SAT) on 3-dimensional shoulder kinematics, strength, and linear measures of subacromial space in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS). BACKGROUND: Abnormal scapular kinematics have been identified in patients with SAIS. Increased scapular upward rotation and posterior tilt, as induced with manual assistance using the SAT, have been theorized to increase subacromial space and may alter shoulder strength. METHODS: Forty-two subjects (21 with SAIS and 21 controls) participated in this study. The anterior outlet of the subacromial space, measured via the acromiohumeral distance on ultrasound images, and 3-dimensional scapular kinematics, measured using motion analysis, were determined with the arm at rest, and at 45° and 90° of active elevation with and without the SAT. A dynamometer was used to measure isometric shoulder strength. Full factorial mixed-model analyses of variance evaluated the effects of the SAT on variables between groups. RESULTS: There was an increase in scapular posterior tilt at all angles, upward rotation at rest and 45° of elevation, and acromiohumeral distance at 45° and at 90° with the SAT. The SAT did not alter normalized isometric strength. There were no differences in response to the SAT between the SAIS and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Manual scapular assistance using the SAT influences factors associated with SAIS, such as subacromial space and potentially scapular orientation during static arm elevation, but not more so in individuals with SAIS than in healthy individuals. The SAT performed statically may be a way to identify potential subgroups of individuals with SAIS for whom subacromial space narrowing may be a contributing factor.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(5):400-412, Epub 27 January 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3579

KEY WORDS: acromiohumeral distance, examination, rotator cuff disease, shoulder, ultrasound imaging

STUDY DESIGN: Case series. BACKGROUND: Few studies have defined the dosage and specific techniques of manual therapy and exercise for rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. This case series describes a standardized treatment program for subacromial impingement syndrome and the time course and outcomes over a 12-week period. CASE DESCRIPTION: Ten patients (age range, 19-70 years) with subacromial impingement syndrome defined by inclusion and exclusion criteria were treated with a standardized protocol for 10 visits over 6 to 8 weeks. The protocol included a 3-phase progressive strengthening program, manual stretching, thrust and nonthrust manipulation to the shoulder and spine, patient education, activity modification, and a daily home exercise program of stretching and strengthening. Patients completed a history and measures of impairments and functional disability at 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks. OUTCOMES: Treatment success was defined as both a 50% improvement on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and a global rating of change of at least “moderately better.” At 6 weeks, 6 of 10 patients had a successful (mean ± SD) DASH outcome score (initial, 33.9 ± 16.2; 6 weeks, 8.1 ± 9.2). At 12 weeks, 8 of 10 patients had a successful DASH outcome score (initial, 33.1 ± 14; 12 weeks, 8.3 ± 6.4). As a group, the largest improvement was in the first 2 weeks. The most common impairments for all 10 patients were rotator cuff and trapezius muscle weakness (10 of 10 patients), limited shoulder internal rotation motion (8 of 10 patients), and reduced kyphosis of the midthoracic area (7 of 10 patients). DISCUSSION: A program aimed at strengthening rotator cuff and scapular muscles, with stretching and manual therapy aimed at thoracic spine and the posterior and inferior soft-tissue structures of the glenohumeral joint appeared to be successful in the majority of patients. This case series describes a comprehensive impairment-based treatment which resulted in symptomatic and functional improvement in 8 of 10 patients in 6 to 12 weeks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 4.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40(8):474-493. doi:10.2519/jospt.2010.3223

KEY WORDS: manipulation, pain, rotator cuff, shoulder, supraspinatus

This was the third research meeting focused on scapular function and dysfunction, following similar meetings in 2003 and 2006. The purpose of this meeting, hosted by the Shoulder Center of Kentucky, was to continue to examine the biomechanical and clinical factors thought to be associated with the role of the scapula in shoulder function and dysfunction. Since the last Summit, much more information has been created in this area, and it was thought that enough progress had been made that an organized overview of current knowledge could provide some consensus statements to guide further research and provide assessment and treatment guidelines. A call for abstracts was extended to researchers with proven interest and published research on the scapula. The meeting was organized around 3 primary categories of information: scapular kinematics and dysfunction, clinical evaluation of the scapula, and interventions. The last session of the meeting involved development of consensus statements for each category. This document represents the current state of knowledge concerning the aspects of scapular function and dysfunction discussed at the Summit. It is expected that, as more knowledge is developed, the gaps will be filled in and a clearer understanding of the roles of the scapula in shoulder function will emerge. This issue includes the consensus statements and abstracts from the Summit.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(11):A1-A13. doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.0303

SYNOPSIS: Frozen shoulder or adhesive capsulitis describes the common shoulder condition characterized by painful and limited active and passive range of motion. The etiology of frozen shoulder remains unclear; however, patients typically demonstrate a characteristic history, clinical presentation, and recovery. A classification schema is described, in which primary frozen shoulder and idiopathic adhesive capsulitis are considered identical and not associated with a systemic condition or history of injury. Secondary frozen shoulder is defined by 3 subcategories: systemic, extrinsic, and intrinsic. We also propose another classification system based on the patient’s irritability level (low, moderate, and high), that we believe is helpful when making clinical decisions regarding rehabilitation intervention. Nonoperative interventions include patient education, modalities, stretching exercises, joint mobilization, and corticosteroid injections. Glenohumeral intra-articular corticosteroid injections, exercise, and joint mobilization all result in improved short- and long-term outcomes. However, there is strong evidence that glenohumeral intra-articular corticosteroid injections have a significantly greater 4- to 6-week beneficial effect compared to other forms of treatment. A rehabilitation model based on evidence and intervention strategies matched with irritability levels is proposed. Exercise and manual techniques are progressed as the patient’s irritability reduces. Response to treatment is based on significant pain relief, improved satisfaction, and return of functional motion. Patients who do not respond or worsen should be referred for an intra-articular corticosteroid injection. Patients who have recalcitrant symptoms and disabling pain may respond to either standard or translational manipulation under anesthesia or arthroscopic release. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(2):135-148. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2916

KEY WORDS: adhesive capsulitis, corticosteroid injection, glenohumeral joint, joint mobilization

STUDY DESIGN: Two group, repeated measures design. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether manually repositioning the scapula using the Scapula Reposition Test (SRT) reduces pain and increases shoulder elevation strength in athletes with and without positive signs of shoulder impingement. BACKGROUND: Symptom alteration tests may be useful in determining a subset of those with shoulder pathology who may benefit from interventions aimed at improving scapular motion abnormalities. METHODS AND MEASURES: One hundred forty-two college athletes underwent testing for clinical signs of shoulder impingement. Tests provoking symptoms were repeated with the scapula manually repositioned into greater retraction and posterior tilt. A numeric rating scale was used to measure symptom intensity under both conditions. Isometric shoulder elevation strength was measured using a mounted dynamometer with the scapula in its natural position and with manual repositioning. A paired t test was used to compare the strength between positions. The frequency of a significant increase in strength with scapular repositioning, defined as the minimal detectable change (90% confidence interval), was also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 98 athletes with a positive impingement test, 46 had reduced pain with scapular repositioning. Although repositioning produced an increase in strength in both the impingement (P=.001) and nonimpingement groups (P=.012), a significant increase in strength was found with repositioning in only 26% of athletes with, and 29% of athletes without positive signs for shoulder impingement. CONCLUSION: The SRT is a simple clinical test that may potentially be useful in an impairment based classification approach to shoulder problems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnosis, Level 4.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008;38(1):4-11, published online 7 September 2007. doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2616

KEY WORDS: posture, rotator cuff, shoulder

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: To compare changes in shoulder internal rotation range of motion (ROM), for 2 stretching exercises, the "cross-body stretch" and the "sleeper stretch," in individuals with posterior shoulder tightness. BACKGROUND: Recently, some authors have expressed the belief that the sleeper stretch is better than the cross-body stretch to address glenohumeral posterior tightness because the scapula is stabilized. METHODS: Fifty-four asymptomatic subjects (20 males, 34 females) participated in the study. The control group (n = 24) consisted of subjects with a between-shoulder difference in internal rotation ROM of less than 10°, whereas those subjects with more than a 10° difference were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 intervention groups, the sleeper stretch group (n = 15) or the cross-body stretch group (n = 15). Shoulder internal rotation ROM, with the arm abducted to 90° and scapula motion prevented, was measured before and after a 4-week intervention period. Subjects in the control group were asked not to engage in any new stretching activities, while subjects in the 2 stretching groups were asked to perform stretching exercises on the more limited side only, once daily for 5 repetitions, holding each stretch for 30 seconds. RESULTS: The improvements in internal rotation ROM for the subjects in the cross-body stretch group (mean ± SD, 20.0° 6 12.9°) were significantly greater than for the subjects in the control group (5.9° ± 9.4°, P = .009). The gains in the sleeper stretch group (12.4° ± 10.4°) were not significant compared to those of the control group (P = .586) and those of the cross-body stretch group (P = .148). CONCLUSIONS: The cross-body stretch in individuals with limited shoulder internal rotation ROM appears to be more effective than no stretching in controls without internal rotation asymmetry to improve shoulder internal rotation ROM. While the improvement in internal rotation from the cross-body stretch was greater than for the sleeper stretch and of a magnitude that could be clinically significant, the small sample size likely precluded statistical significance between groups.  

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(3):108-114. doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2337 

KEY WORDS: internal rotation, shoulder, stretching, tightness

Study Design: Nonrandomized 2-group post-test only. Objective: To compare scapular position and orientation between subjects with and without impingement syndrome. Background: Abnormal scapular motion is commonly believed to be a contributing factor to shoulder impingement syndrome. Methods and Measures: Twenty nonimpaired subjects with a mean age of 34.3 (± 7.5 years) and 17 patients with impingement syndrome with a mean age of 45.8 (± 11.0) participated. A 3-dimemionaI electromechanical digitizer was used to measure scapular position and orientation in 3 planes. Measurements were taken with the arm at the side, elevated in the scapular plane to horizontal, and at maximum elevation. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare nonimpaired subjects to the impingement group and the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides within the impingement group. Five scapular kinematic variables were assessed at each arm position. Orientation was described by posterior tilting angle, upward rotation angle, and internal rotation angle. Position was described by medial-lateral position and superior-inferior position and determined by the distance from the scapula centroid to the seventh cervical vertebra (C7). Results: During scapular plane elevation of the arm, the scapula showed a general pattern of increasing posterior-tilt angle, increasing upward-rotation angle, and decreasing internal-rotation angle in both impingement and nonimpaired groups. Also, the scapula moved to a more superior position and a slightly more medial position with increasing arm elevation. Compared to nonimpaired subjects (34.6° ± 9.7), those with impingement demonstrated a significantly lower posterior tilting angle of the scapula in the sagittal plane (25.1° ± 9.1). Subjects with impingement also demonstrated higher superior-inferior scapular position with maximal arm elevation (5.2 cm ± 1.6 below the first thoracic vertebrae) compared to nonimpaired subjects (7.5 cm ± 1.5). Conclusions: These results suggest that altered scapular kinematics may be an important aspect of the impingement syndrome.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999;29(10):574-586.

Key Words: impingement, kinematics, rotator cuff, scapula, shoulder

Study Design: Repeated-measures experimental design.
Objective: To determine the effects of shoulder external rotator muscle fatigue on 3-dimensional scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics.
Background: The external rotator muscles of the shoulder are important for normal shoulder function. Impaired performance of these muscles has been observed in subjects with impingement syndrome and it is possible that external rotator muscle fatigue leads to altered kinematics of the shoulder girdle.
Methods and Measures: Twenty subjects without a history of shoulder pathology participated in this study. Three-dimensional scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics were determined from electromagnetic sensors attached to the scapula, humerus, and thorax. Surface electromyographic (EMG) data were collected from the upper and lower trapezius, serratus anterior, anterior and posterior deltoid, and infraspinatus muscles. Median power frequency (MPF) values were derived from the raw EMG data and were used to indicate the degree of local muscle fatigue. Kinematic and EMG measures were collected prior to and immediately following the performance of a shoulder external rotation fatigue protocol.
Results: After completing the fatigue protocol subjects demonstrated less external rotation of the humerus. Additionally, they had less posterior tilt of the scapula in the beginning phase of arm elevation, and more scapular upward rotation and clavicular retraction in the mid ranges of arm elevation.
Conclusions: Performance of an external rotation fatigue protocol results in altered scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics. Further studies are needed to investigate the effects of external rotator muscle fatigue on scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics in subjects with shoulder pathology.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(8):557-571. doi:10.2519/ jospt.2006.2189

Key Words: muscle endurance, shoulder biomechanics, 3-dimensional scapular motion