<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Phillip O. Burr, PA, MS, ATC]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/phillipoburr</link>
<description></description>
<language></language>
<copyright></copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs></docs>
<generator></generator>
<managingEditor></managingEditor>
<webMaster></webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Effect of Transducer Velocity on Intramuscular Temperature During a 1-MHz Ultrasound Treatment</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1037/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.stephanielweaver/author.asp">Stephanie L. Weaver</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.timothyjdemchak/author.asp">Timothy J. Demchak</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.marcusbstone/author.asp">Marcus B. Stone</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jodybbrucker/author.asp">Jody B. Brucker</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.phillipoburr/author.asp">Phillip O. Burr</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design: </strong>A 3 &times; 2 repeated-measures design was used. The independent variables were transducer velocity (2-3 cm/s, 4-5 cm/s, and 7-8 cm/s) and time (pretreatment and posttreatment).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if transducer velocity of a 1-MHz ultrasound treatment affects intramuscular tissue temperature.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Most authors advocate ultrasound transducer velocities of 2 to 4 cm/s within an area of 2 to 3 times the effective radiating area or 2 times the size of the transducer head. However, a much faster rate of application (approximately 7-8 cm/s) is often observed in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods and Measures: </strong>Eleven healthy screened volunteers (9 males, 2 females; mean &plusmn; SD age, 22.6 &plusmn; 1.7 years; mean &plusmn; SD height, 175.7 &plusmn; 13.7 cm; mean &plusmn; SD body mass, 82.5 &plusmn; 19.5 kg) were randomly assigned to a treatment order with all conditions administered during a single testing session. Each transducer velocity condition was administered for 10 minutes, using 1-MHz ultrasound with a 100% continuous duty cycle at an intensity of 1.5 W/cm<sup>2</sup> over an area twice the size of the transducer head. After the first treatment, the 2 remaining subsequent velocity conditions were administered after the intramuscular temperature returned to within &plusmn;0.3&deg;C of the initial pretreatment temperature for 5 minutes. The dependent variable was left triceps surae muscle temperature measured at 3 cm below one half the measured skinfold thickness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Temperature increase across the 3 velocities was within 0.4&deg;C (F<sub>2,20</sub> = 0.07, P = .93). Posttreatment values (mean &plusmn; SD) ranged from 42.7&deg;C &plusmn; 2.3&deg;C for the slowest velocity to 43.1&deg;C &plusmn; 1.4&deg;C for the fastest velocity. Temperature increase was significant for time (F<sub>1,10</sub> = 155.68, P&lt;.00001), increasing from 37.8&deg;C &plusmn; 0.8&deg;C pretreatment to 42.9&deg;C &plusmn; 1.9&deg;C after treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Very similar intramuscular temperature increases can be observed among ultrasound treatments (10-minute duration, 1-MHz frequency, 100% continuous duty cycle, 1.5 W/cm<sup>2</sup> intensity, within an area twice the size of the transducer head), with transducer velocities of 2 to 3, 4 to 5, and 7 to 8 cm/s. </p><p>&nbsp;J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(5):320-325. doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2157</p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> calf heating, piezoelectric modality, therapeutic modality</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1037/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>
