<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Reto Babst, MD]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/retobabst</link>
<description></description>
<language></language>
<copyright></copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs></docs>
<generator></generator>
<managingEditor></managingEditor>
<webMaster></webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change for the Figure-of-Eight-20 Method of Measurement of Ankle Edema</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1248/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.manuelarohnerspengler/author.asp">Manuela Rohner-Spengler</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.annefmannion/author.asp">Anne F. Mannion</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.retobabst/author.asp">Reto Babst</a><br /><strong><font color="#000099">STUDY DESIGN:</font></strong> Single-session, repeated-measures design, with 3 raters. <strong><font color="#000099">OBJECTIVES:</font></strong> To determine the intrarater and interrater reliability and the minimal detectable change score for a modified version of the figure-of-eight method of measurement of ankle edema (figure-of-eight-20) developed for patients with severe injuries. <strong><font color="#000099">BACKGROUND:</font></strong> The precise quantification of ankle edema is necessary to determine the relative effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing swelling, and to monitor individual progress during treatment. <strong><font color="#000099">METHODS AND MEASURES:</font></strong> Thirty subjects (mean &plusmn; SD age, 46 &plusmn; 16 years; 9 female and 21 male) with ankle edema following surgery for malleolar fracture took part in the study. Each of 3 raters performed 3 measurements of the affected ankle without marking landmarks and 3 measure&shy;ments of both ankles using skin markings. The order of the raters was randomized and the raters were blinded to each other&#39;s results. <strong><font color="#000099">RESULTS:</font></strong> The figure-of-eight-20 method showed high intrarater and interrater reliability (in&shy;traclass correlation coefficients greater than .99). The minimal detectable change (MDC<sub>95%</sub>) for the swollen ankle was 9.6 mm when measured without skin marks and 7.3 mm with marks. The difference in circumference of the affected and unaffected ankle (mean &plusmn; SD, 33.8 &plusmn; 12.1 mm) consistently exceeded the MDC<sub>95%</sub>, even in patients with only mild edema. <strong><font color="#000099">CONCLUSIONS:</font></strong> The standardized figure-of-eight-20 offers a good option for reliably measuring ankle circumference in patients with severe ankle trauma. In repeated assessments, greater accuracy is likely to be obtained when the landmarks for measurement are marked and the same rater carries out the measurements. <p>&nbsp;</p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(4):199-205.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2007.2371</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong><font color="#000099">KEY WORDS:</font></strong> ankle swelling, circumference measurements, tape measure</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1248/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>
