J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002; 32(3):114–124.

Key Words: neural entrapment, plantar fasciitis

Study Design: Case report. Objective: To describe an alternative treatment approach for patellofemoral pain. Background: Weakness of the hip, pelvis, and trunk musculature has been hypothesized to influence lower-limb alignment and contribute to patellofemoral pain. Two patients who had a chief complaint of patellofemoral pain and demonstrated lack of control of the hip in the frontal and transverse planes during functional movements were treated with an exercise program targeting the hip, pelvis, and trunk musculature. Methods and Measures: The patients presented in these 2 case reports did not exhibit obvious patellar malalignment or tracking problems; however, on qualitative assessment, both demonstrated excessive hip adduction, internal rotation, and knee valgus during gait and while performing a step-down maneuver. In addition, both patients exhibited weakness of the hip abductors, extensors, and external rotators, as demonstrated by hand-held dynamometry testing. Treatment in both cases occurred over a 14-week period and focused on recruitment and endurance training of the hip, pelvis, and trunk musculature. Functional status, pain, muscle force production, as well as subjective and objective assessment of lower-extremity kinematics during gait and a step-down maneuver were assessed preintervention and postintervention. Results: Both patients experienced a significant reduction in patellofemoral pain, improved lower-extremity kinematics during dynamic testing, and were able to return to their original levels of function. Gluteus medius force production improved by 50% in patient A and 90% in patient B, while gluteus maximus force production improved 55% in patient A and 110% in patient B. Objective kinematic improvements in the step-down task also were demonstrated in patient A. Conclusion: Assessment and treatment of the hip, pelvis, and trunk musculature should be considered in the rehabilitation of patients who present with patellofemoral pain and demonstrate abnormal lower-extremity kinematics.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(11):642-660.
 

Key Words: case study, knee pain, lower-extremity rehabilitation, therapeutic exercise

Study Design: Cross-sectional. Objective: To investigate the association between lumbar segmental motion and pain response during the application of a posterior-to-anterior (PA) force to the lumbar spinous processes in persons with nonspecific low back pain. Background: Although low back pain is believed to be associated with altered segmental motion of the lumbar spine, the relationship between subjective reports of pain and objective measurements of segmental motion has not been established. Methods and Measures: Thirty-five individuals between 18 and 45 years of age with nonspecific low back pain (less than 3 months’ duration) participated. All subjects participated in 2 separate procedures: (1) segmental motion assessment during a PA force application over the lumbar spinous processes using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (2) pain assessment during a PA force application procedure outside of the MRI environment. Frequency counts were used to determine the lumbar segments that were most painful, and which functional spinal units had the most and least motion. Fisher exact tests were performed to determine if an association existed between the most painful segment and the functional spinal unit with the most or least motion. Results: L5 was deemed the most painful segment in nearly half of the participants (48.1%). The L1-2 and L3-4 functional spinal units most frequently had the most motion (25.9% each) and the L4-5 functional spinal units most frequently had the least motion (29.6%). No association was found between the most painful segment and the functional spinal units with either the most or least motion. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that an assumption regarding segmental motion cannot be inferred from the pain response when using a PA force application procedure.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(4):203-209. doi:10.2519/jospt.2005.1479

Key Words: lumbar spine, manual therapy, painful segment

Although patellar taping has been reported to be effective in reducing pain, the effects of this procedure on functional outcomes, such as ambulation, have not been documented. The purpose of this study was to compare stride characteristics and joint motion in subjects with patellofemoral pain, with and without the application of patellar taping using the McConnell technique. Fifteen female subjects between the ages of 14 and 41 years with a diagnosis of patellofemoral pain participated in this study. Stride characteristics (Stride Analyzer) and sagittal plane joint motion (VICON) were recorded simultaneously during taped and untaped trials of free walking, fast walking, and ascending and descending a ramp and stairs. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine differences between taped and untaped trials. Although subjects reported an average pain reduction of 78% using a visual analogue scale, the only significant change in stride characteristics was an increase in stride length during ramp ascent. Patellar taping did, however, result in a small but significant increase in loading response knee flexion across all conditions tested. We believe this finding demonstrates more willingness by the patellofemoral pain subjects to load the knee joint, thus permitting increased shock absorption, increased quadriceps activity, and tolerance of increased patellofemoral joint reaction force.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;26(6):286-291.

Key Words: patellofemoral pain, patellar taping, gait

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002; 32(7):318–326.

Key Words: extension syndrome, manual therapy, thoracic spine