<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - Rodney Imamura, PhD]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/rodneyimamura</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://feedvalidator.org/docs/rss2.html</docs>
<generator>www.eResources.com (Generator)</generator>
<managingEditor>jospt@eresources.com (JOSPT)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jospt@eresources.com (eResources)</webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.asp" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Core Muscle Activation During Swiss Ball and Traditional Abdominal Exercises</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2442/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.rafaelfescamilla/author.asp">Rafael F. Escamilla</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.clarelewis/author.asp">Clare Lewis</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.duncanbell/author.asp">Duncan Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.gwenbramblet/author.asp">Gwen Bramblet</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jasondaffron/author.asp">Jason Daffron</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.stevelambert/author.asp">Steve Lambert</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.amandapecson/author.asp">Amanda Pecson</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.rodneyimamura/author.asp">Rodney Imamura</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.lonniepaulos/author.asp">Lonnie Paulos</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p><font color="#000099"><strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong></font> Controlled laboratory study using a repeated-measures, counterbalanced design. <font color="#000099"><strong>OBJECTIVES:</strong></font> To test the ability of 8 Swiss ball exercises (roll-out, pike, knee-up, skier, hip extension right, hip extension left, decline push-up, and sitting march right) and 2 traditional abdominal exercises (crunch and bent-knee sit-up) on activating core (lumbopelvic hip complex) musculature. <font color="#000099"><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong></font> Numerous Swiss ball abdominal exercises are employed for core muscle strengthening during training and rehabilitation, but there are minimal data to substantiate the ability of these exercises to recruit core muscles. It is also unknown how core muscle recruitment in many of these Swiss ball exercises compares to core muscle recruitment in traditional abdominal exercises such as the crunch and bent-knee sit-up. <font color="#000099"><strong>METHODS:</strong></font> A convenience sample of 18 subjects performed 5 repetitions for each exercise. Electromyographic (EMG) data were recorded on the right side for upper and lower rectus abdominis, external and internal oblique, latissimus dorsi, lumbar paraspinals, and rectus femoris, and then normalized using maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs). <font color="#000099"><strong>RESULTS:</strong></font> EMG signals during the roll-out and pike exercises for the upper rectus abdominis (63% and 46% MVIC, respectively), lower rectus abdominis (53% and 55% MVIC, respectively), external oblique (46% and 84% MVIC, respectively), and internal oblique (46% and 56% MVIC, respectively) were significantly greater compared to most other exercises, where EMG signals ranged between 7% to 53% MVIC for the upper rectus abdominis, 7% to 44% MVIC for the lower rectus abdominis, 14% to 73% MVIC for the external oblique, and 16% to 47% MVIC for the internal oblique. The lowest EMG signals were consistently found in the sitting march right exercise. Latissimus dorsi EMG signals were greatest in the pike, knee-up, skier, hip extension right and left, and decline push-up (17%-25% MVIC), and least with the sitting march right, crunch, and bent-knee sit-up exercises (7%-8% MVIC). Rectus femoris EMG signal was greatest with the hip extension left exercise (35% MVIC), and least with the crunch, roll-out, hip extension right, and decline push-up exercises (6%-10% MVIC). Lumbar paraspinal EMG signal was relative low (less than 10% MVIC) for all exercises. <font color="#000099"><strong>CONCLUSIONS:</strong></font> The roll-out and pike were the most effective exercises in activating upper and lower rectus abdominis, external and internal obliques, and latissimus dorsi muscles, while minimizing lumbar paraspinals and rectus femoris activity. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40(5):265-276, Epub 22 April 2010. doi:10.2519/jospt.2010.3073 </em></p><p><font color="#000099"><strong>KEY WORDS:</strong></font> crunch, EMG, low back pain, lumbar spine, rectus abdominis, sit-up</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2442/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Patellofemoral Joint Force and Stress Between a Short- and Long-Step Forward Lunge</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2258/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.rafaelfescamilla/author.asp">Rafael F. Escamilla</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.naiquanzheng/author.asp">Naiquan Zheng</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.torandmacleod/author.asp">Toran D. MacLeod</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.wbrentedwards/author.asp">W. Brent Edwards</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.alanhreljac/author.asp">Alan Hreljac</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.glennsfleisig/author.asp">Glenn S. Fleisig</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.kevinewilk/author.asp">Kevin E. Wilk</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.claudetmoorman/author.asp">Claude T. Moorman</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.rodneyimamura/author.asp">Rodney Imamura</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jamesrandrews/author.asp">James R. Andrews</a><br /><p><strong><font color="#000099">STUDY DESIGN:</font></strong>&nbsp;Controlled laboratory biomechanics study using a repeated-measures, counterbalanced design.&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">OBJECTIVES:</font></strong> To compare patellofemoral joint force and stress between a short- and long-step forward lunge both with and without a stride.&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">BACKGROUND:</font></strong> Although weight-bearing forward-lunge exercises are frequently employed during rehabilitation for individuals with patellofemoral joint syndrome, patellofemoral joint force and stress and how they change with variations of the lunge exercise are currently unknown.&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">METHODS AND MEASURES:</font></strong> Eighteen subjects used their 12-repetition maximum weight while performing a short- and long-step forward lunge both with and without a stride. Electromyography, ground reaction force, and kinematic variables were put into a biomechanical optimization model, and patellofemoral joint force and stress were calculated as a function of knee angle.&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">RESULTS:</font></strong> Visual observation of the data show that during the forward lunge,&nbsp;patellofemoral joint force and stress increased progressively as knee flexion increased, and decreased progressively as knee flexion decreased. Between 70&deg;&nbsp;and 90&deg; of knee flexion, patellofemoral joint force and stress were significantly greater when performing a forward lunge with a short step compared to a long step (<em>P</em>&lt;.025).&nbsp;Between 10&deg; and 40&deg; of knee flexion, patellofemoral joint force and stress were significantly greater when performing a forward lunge with a stride compared to without a stride (<em>P</em>&lt;.025).&nbsp;<strong><font color="#000099">CONCLUSIONS:</font></strong> When the goal is to minimize patellofemoral joint force and stress during the forward lunge performed between 0&deg; to 90&deg; knee angles, it may be prudent to perform the lunge with a long step compared to a short step and without a stride compared to with a stride, because patellofemoral joint force and stress magnitudes were greater with a short step compared to a long step at higher knee flexion angles and were greater with a stride compared to without a stride at lower knee flexion angles.</p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008; 38(11):681-690, Epub 24 October&nbsp;2008. doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2694</em>&nbsp; </p><p><strong><font color="#000099">KEY WORDS:</font></strong>&nbsp;knee, knee kinetics, patella, rehabilitation</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.2258/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>

