STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of case control studies. OBJECTIVES: To identify and analyze demographic and structural factors associated with hallux limitus/rigidus. METHODS: A literature search was conducted across several electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed) using the following terms: hallux limitus, hallux rigidus, metatarsophalangeal joint, and big toe. Methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Quality Index. To evaluate the magnitude of differences between cases and controls, odds ratios were calculated for dichotomous variables and effect sizes (Cohen d) were calculated for continuous variables. RESULTS: The methodological quality of the 7 included studies was moderate, with Quality Index scores ranging from 6 to 11 out of a possible score of 14. The overall mean age for the case group was 44.8 years (mean range, 23.4-54.9 years) and for the control group was 39.6 years (mean range, 23.4-58.8 years). There was a similar distribution of males and females across case and control groups. All studies used plain film radiography to assess foot structure. Cases were found to have a dorsiflexed first metatarsal relative to the second metatarsal, a plantar flexed forefoot on the rearfoot, reduced first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion, a longer proximal phalanx, distal phalanx, medial sesamoid, and lateral sesamoid, and a wider first metatarsal and proximal phalanx. Measures of foot posture and arch height were not found to substantially differ between cases and controls. CONCLUSIONS: This review of case control studies indicates that several variables pertaining to the structure of the first metatarsophalangeal joint may be associated with hallux limitus/rigidus. These findings have implications for the conservative and surgical treatment of the condition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis, level 2a–.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(10):733-742. doi:10.2519/jospt.2009.3003

KEY WORDS: arthritis, foot, hallux limitus, hallux rigidus, podiatry, risk factor

Study Design: Concurrent validity study. Objectives: To determine the validity of 3 clinical methods for assessing static foot posture in older people. Background: Variations in the structure of the medial longitudinal arch are thought to influence lower extremity function; however, the validity of clinical measurements has not been fully established. Methods and Measures: Clinical measurements of arch index (AI), navicular height (NH), and Foot Posture Index (FPI) were performed on 95 subjects (31 men and 64 women), aged 62 to 94 years (mean ± SD, 78.6 ± 6.5 years). These clinical measurements were then correlated with 3 arch-related measurements from radiographs: navicular height (NHr), calcaneal inclination angle (CIA), and calcaneal first metatarsal angle (C1MA). Results: All 3 clinical measures demonstrated significant associations with each of the radiographic parameters (P<.01). NH was highly correlated with NHr (Pearson r = 0.79), followed by C1MA (r = –0.53), and CIA (r = 0.44). The AI was highly correlated with the C1MA (r = 0.71) and CIA (r = –0.68), but only moderately correlated with NHr (r = 0.52). The FPI demonstrated weaker correlations with the radiographic parameters (NHr, r = 0.59; CIA, r = 0.36; C1MA, r = 0.42). Conclusion: Clinical measurements of AI, NH, and FPI provide valid information regarding the structure of the medial longitudinal arch; however, each test may reflect different aspects of arch structure. NH would appear to be the most useful clinical measure, as it is simple to perform and provides an accurate representation of the skeletal alignment of the medial longitudinal arch. Further refinement of the clinical measurement of NH is now required to improve its moderate intratester and intertester reliability.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(8):479-486. doi:10.2519/jospt.2005.2048

Key Words: aged, arch, clinical measurement, radiographic