<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy - March 2003 Volume 33, No. 3]]></title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issue/type.2,year.2003,month.3/pastissues.asp</link>
<description></description>
<language></language>
<copyright></copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs></docs>
<generator></generator>
<managingEditor></managingEditor>
<webMaster></webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Direct Access: The Time Has Come for Action</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.96/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.timothywflynn/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Timothy W. Flynn</a><br /><p align="left">Direct access is &quot;the right of the public to direct consultation with physical therapists for examination, evaluation, and intervention.&quot; The challenge for physical therapists in this country is to actively engage on alllevels (patient, reimbursement, political, etc) to insure the rights of individuals to receive our services without unnecessary hassles and financial burdens. Direct access to physical therapy services has been a part of the US Army Health Care system for over 30 years and is a legal reality in the majority of states throughout the US.</p><p align="left"><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003; 33(3):102-103.</em></p><p align="left"><strong>Key Words:</strong> direct access, military</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.96/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Exertional Rhabdomyolysis</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.99/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.richardebaxter/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Richard E. Baxter</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.josefhmoore/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Josef H. Moore</a><br /><p>This case report involving a 20-year-old male in the military serves as a reminder that not every individual presenting with musculoskeletal dysfunction has a simple uncomplicated musculoskeletal problem. Always consider acute exertional rhabdomyolysis (AER) as a differential diagnosis in patients who have performed intense exercise recently and are now complaining of muscle pain and weakness, especially if they have any of the AER risk factors discussed in this report (poor physical condition, exercising in a hot, humid environment, and poor fluid intake). These patients have an excellent prognosis if AER is caught early and treated aggressively. However, serious complications can occur if AER is overlooked or dismissed as delayed onset muscle soreness. </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(3):104-108.</em></p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> differential diagnosis, military</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.99/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Shoulder Musculature Activation During Upper Extremity Weight-BearingExercise</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.timothyluhl/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Timothy L. Uhl</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.thomasjcarver/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Thomas J. Carver</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.carlgmattacola/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Carl G. Mattacola</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.scottdmair/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Scott D. Mair</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.arthurjnitz/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Arthur J. Nitz</a><br /><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> Repeated-measures design comparing 7 static weight-bearing shoulder exercises. <strong>Objective:</strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the demand on shoulder musculature during weight-bearing exercises and the relationship between increasing weight-bearing posture and shoulder muscle activation. <strong>Background:</strong> Weight-bearing shoulder exercises are commonly prescribed in the rehabilitation of shoulder injuries. Limited information is available as to the demands placed on shoulder musculature while these exercises are performed. <strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen healthy college students volunteered for this study. Surface bipolar electrodes were applied over the infraspinatus, posterior deltoid, anterior deltoid, and pectoralis major muscles. Fine-wire bipolar intramuscular electrodes were inserted into the supraspinatus muscle. Electromyographic (EMG) root mean square signal intensity was normalized to 1 second of EMG obtained with a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Subjects were tested under 7 isometric exercise positions that progressively increased upper extremity weight-bearing posture. <strong>Results:</strong> There was a high correlation between increasing weight-bearing posture and muscular activity (r = 0.97, p&lt;0.01). There was relatively little demand on the shoulder musculature for the prayer and quadruped positions (2%-10% MVIC). Muscular activation was greater for the infraspinatus than for other shoulder muscles throughout most of the exercise positions tested. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> These results indicate that alterations of weight-bearing exercises, by varying the amount of arm support and force, resulted in very different demands on the shoulder musculature. Specifically, the infraspinatus was particularly active during the weight-bearing exercises used in this study.</p><p><br /><em>J Ortho Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33:109-117.</em> </p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> electromyography, muscles, progressive resistive exercise, rehabilitation<br /></p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Posterior-Anterior Glide of the Femoral Head in the Acetabulum: A Cadaver Study</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.97/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.linnharding/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Linn Harding</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.maryfbarbe/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Mary F. Barbe</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.katherineshepard/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Katherine Shepard</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.amymarks/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Amy Marks</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.raymondajai/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Raymond Ajai</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jenniferlardiere/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Jennifer Lardiere</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.heathersweringa/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Heather Sweringa</a><br /><strong>Study Design:</strong> Descriptive study employing cadaver dissection and measurement of posterior-anterior (PA) glide of the femoral head in the acetabulum. <strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify PA glide of the femoral head in the acetabulum in a cadaveric sample. <strong>Background:</strong> Posterior-anterior glide of the femoral head within the acetabulum is a joint mobilization procedure described in orthopaedic physical therapy texts, yet there is no published evidence that the joint structures of the hip allow such movement. This study attempted to quantify PA glide of the femoral head in the hip joints of embalmed cadavers. <strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve hips, 3 male and 9 female, from 8 embalmed cadavers were employed in this study. Hips were dissected to the level of the joint capsule and a metal rod inserted through the femoral neck served as a mobilizing handle. A load cell was installed into this handle so that mobilizing forces could be monitored. A dial gauge, which recorded displacement of the femoral head, was mounted to the pelvis via bone pins and an external fixator. <strong>Results:</strong> Using mobilizing forces of 89, 178, 267, and 356 N, mean femoral head displacements of 0.57, 0.93, 1.20, and 1.52 mm were recorded. Within the 89-N trials, PA displacement ranged from a minimum of 0.04 mm to a maximum of 1.54 mm. Within the 356-N trials, PA displacement of the femoral head ranged from a minimum of 0.25 mm to a maximum of 2.90 mm. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> In an embalmed cadaveric model, measurable PA glide of the femoral head within the acetabulum does exist and it is highly variable between individuals. <p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33:118-125.</em> </p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> accessory movement, cadaver hip joint, joint mobilization, posterior-anterior glide</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.97/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Movement System Impairment-Based Categories for Low Back Pain: Stage I Validation</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.98/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.shirleyasahrmann/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Shirley A. Sahrmann</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.barbarajnorton/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Barbara J. Norton</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.cherylacaldwell/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Cheryl A. Caldwell</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.nancyjbloom/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Nancy J. Bloom</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.marykatemcdonnell/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Mary Kate McDonnell</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.lindarvandillen/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Linda R. Van Dillen</a><br /><strong>Study Design:</strong> Cross-sectional study of patients with mechanical low back pain (MLBP). <strong>Objective: </strong>To test the construct validity of 3 categories of a movement system impairment-based classification proposed for use with patients with MLBP. <strong>Background:</strong> A pathoanatomic basis for directing treatment has not proven useful in a wide variety of patients with MLBP. In addition, there is a paucity of data describing the movement system impairments that characterize many of the pathoanatomically based MLBP diagnoses. Because of the mechanical nature of MLBP, a system based on groups of signs and symptoms relevant to conservative management needs to be developed. <strong>Methods and Measures:</strong> A movement system impairment-based classification was proposed that defined 5 categories of MLBP based on the findings from a standardized examination. Using the examination, 5 physical therapists examined a total of 188 patients with MLBP. A principal components analysis with an oblique rotation was conducted. Eigenvalues were plotted and a scree test was used to determine the number of factors to retain. A split-sample cross-validation procedure was conducted to verify the factor structure. <strong>Results:</strong> Three factors were identified in both samples: 2 factors related to symptoms with lumbar rotation and lumbar extension alignments or movements, and 1 factor related to signs of lumbar rotation with different alignments and movements. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Our results provide support for 3 factors related to 3 of the 5 proposed categories: lumbar rotation with extension, lumbar rotation, and lumbar extension. The existence of these 3 factors provides preliminary evidence for specific clusters of tests of alignment and movement impairments that could be used in classifying patients with MLBP into movement-system-related categories. <p><em>J Ortho Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33:126-142.</em> </p><p><strong>Key Words:</strong> classification, impairment, low back pain, principal components analysis, validity</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.98/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>
