<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>December 2006 Volume 36, No. 12</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issue/type.2,year.2006,month.12/pastissues.asp</link>
<description></description>
<language></language>
<copyright></copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:05:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs></docs>
<generator></generator>
<managingEditor></managingEditor>
<webMaster></webMaster>
<ttl>0</ttl>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  rel="self" href="" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>JOSPT: A Team Effort</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1214/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.guygsimoneau/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Guy G. Simoneau</a><br /><p><font color="#000000"><strong>The Editor-in-Chief thanks the many dedicated and thoughtful individuals who contributed to the success of the <em>Journal</em> in 2006: the authors of manuscripts, guest editorials, and book reviews; manuscript reviewers, editorial review board members, and associate editors. </strong></font><font color="#003300"><font color="#000000"><em>Journal</em> review time has steadily improved over the past 2 years.</font> </font>The review time for new manuscript submissions averaged 52 days (median 50 days) in 2006, and for revised manuscripts, 30 days (median 27 days). This demonstrates excellent performance by the reviewers and the editorial board members.&nbsp; </p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 36(12):899-902.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.0113</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1214/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Comparison of Serratus Anterior Muscle Activation During a Wall Slide Exercise and Other Traditional Exercises</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1215/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.marykatemcdonnell/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Mary Kate McDonnell</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.dustinhhardwick/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Dustin H. Hardwick</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.justinabeebe/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Justin A. Beebe</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.catherineelang/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Catherine E. Lang</a><br /><p><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Study Design:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Single-group repeated-measures design. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Objectives:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">To investigate the ability of the wall slide exercise to activate the serratus anterior muscle (SA) at and above 90&deg; of humeral elevation. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Background:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Strengthening of the SA is a critical component of rehabilitation for patients with shoulder impingement syndromes. Traditional SA exercises have included scapular protraction exercises such as the push-up plus. These exercises promote activation of the SA near 90&deg; of humeral elevation, but not in positions above 90&deg; where patients typically experience pain. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Methods and Measures:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Twenty healthy subjects were studied performing 3 exercises: (1) wall slide, (2) plus phase of a wall push-up plus, and (3) scapular plane shoulder elevation. Three-dimensional position of the thorax, scapula, and humerus and muscle activity from the SA, upper and lower trapezius, and latissimus dorsi were recorded. The magnitudes of activation for each muscle at 90&deg;, 120&deg;, and 140&deg; of humeral elevation were quantified from EMG records. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to determine the degree to which the different exercises activated the SA at the 3 humeral positions. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Results: </font></span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">The</font> intensity of SA activity was not significantly different between the 3 exercises at 90&deg; of humeral elevation (P = .40). For the wall slide and scapular plane shoulder elevation exercises, SA activity increased with increasing humeral elevation angle (P = .001), with no significant differences between the 2 exercises (P = .36). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The wall slide is an effective exercise to activate the SA muscle at and above 90&deg; of shoulder elevation. During this exercise, SA activation is not significantly different from SA activation during the push-up plus and scapular plane shoulder elevation, 2 exercises previously validated in the literature.&nbsp; </span></p><p style="margin: 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(12):903-910.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2306</span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&nbsp;</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Key Words:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">electromyography, scapula, shoulder</span><span style="font-family: Arial"></span></p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1215/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Star Excursion Balance Test as a Predictor of Lower Extremity Injury in High School Basketball Players</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1216/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.phillipjplisky/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Phillip J. Plisky</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.mitchelljrauh/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Mitchell J. Rauh</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.thomaswkaminski/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Thomas W. Kaminski</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.frankbunderwood/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Frank B. Underwood</a><br /><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Study Design:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Prospective cohort. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Objective:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">To determine if Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) reach distance was associated with risk of lower extremity injury among high school basketball players. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Background:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Although balance has been proposed as a risk factor for sports-related injury, few researchers have used a dynamic balance test to examine this relationship. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Methods and Measures:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Prior to the 2004 basketball season, the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral SEBT reach distances and limb lengths of 235 high school basketball players were measured bilaterally. The Athletic Health Care System Daily Injury Report was used to document time loss injuries. After normalizing for lower limb length, each reach distance, right/left reach distance difference, and composite reach distance were examined using odds ratio and logistic regression analyses. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Results:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The reliability of the SEBT components ranged from 0.82 to 0.87 (ICC</span><sub><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">3,1</span></sub><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">) and was 0.99 for the measurement of limb length. Logistic regression models indicated that players with an anterior right/left reach distance difference greater than 4 cm were 2.5 times more likely to sustain a lower extremity injury (P&lt;.05). Girls with a composite reach distance less than 94.0% of their limb length were 6.5 times more likely to have a lower extremity injury (P&lt;.05). </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Conclusions:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">We found components of the SEBT to be reliable and predictive measures of lower extremity injury in high school basketball players. Our results suggest that the SEBT can be incorporated into preparticipation physical examinations to identify basketball players who are at increased risk for injury.&nbsp;&nbsp; </span><p style="margin: 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(12):911-919.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2244</span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&nbsp;</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Key Words:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">female athlete, neuromuscular control, postural stability</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1216/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Use of Real-Time Ultrasound Imaging for Biofeedback of Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Contraction in Healthy Subjects</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1217/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.khaivan/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Khai Van</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.julieahides/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Julie A. Hides</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.carolynarichardson/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Carolyn A. Richardson</a><br /><p><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Study Design:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Randomized controlled trial. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Objective:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">To determine if the provision of visual biofeedback using real-time ultrasound imaging enhances the ability to activate the multifidus muscle. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Background:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Increasingly clinicians are using real-time ultrasound as a form of biofeedback when re-educating muscle activation. The effectiveness of this form of biofeedback for the multifidus muscle has not been reported. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Methods and Measures:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Healthy subjects were randomly divided into groups that received different forms of biofeedback. All subjects received clinical instruction on how to activate the multifidus muscle isometrically prior to testing and verbal feedback regarding the amount of multifidus contraction, which occurred during 10 repetitions (acquisition phase). In addition, 1 group received visual biofeedback (watched the multifidus muscle contract) using real-time ultrasound imaging. All subjects were reassessed a week later (retention phase). </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Results:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Subjects from both groups improved their voluntary contraction of the multifidus muscle in the acquisition phase (P&lt;.001) and the ability to recruit the multifidus muscle differed between groups (P&lt;.05), with subjects in the group that received visual ultrasound biofeedback achieving greater improvements. In addition, the group that received visual ultrasound biofeedback retained their improvement in performance from week 1 to week 2 (P&gt;.90), whereas the performance of the other group decreased (P&lt;.05). </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Conclusion:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Real-time ultrasound imaging can be used to provide visual biofeedback and improve performance and retention in the ability to activate the multifidus muscle in healthy subjects. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(12):920-925.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2304</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Key Words:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">lumbar spine, motor learning, sonography, stabilization, trunk exercises</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1217/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scapular Angular Positioning at End Range Internal Rotation in Cases of Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1218/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.paulamludewig/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Paula M. Ludewig</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaelrborich/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Michael R. Borich</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.jolenembright/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Jolene M. Bright</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.davidjlorello/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >David J. Lorello</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.cortjcieminski/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Cort J. Cieminski</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.terrybuisman/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Terry Buisman</a><br /><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Study Design:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Controlled laboratory study. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Objectives:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Investigate the relationship between glenohumeral internal rotation range-of-motion deficit and 3-dimensional scapular angular positioning during active arm movements in participants with recent participation in overhead sports activity. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Background:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Subacromial impingement is one of the most common shoulder pathologies and is multifactorial in etiology. Posterior glenohumeral joint capsule tightness has been theorized to contribute to one potential causal factor: abnormal scapular positioning. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Methods and Measures:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Twenty-three subjects, who had participated in competitive sports involving overhead activity within the last 5 years, were categorized into 2 groups based on the degree of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (20% deficit threshold). Scapular angular positioning of subjects performing shoulder internal rotation from 90&deg; flexion and abduction shoulder positions was evaluated using 3-dimensional electromagnetic surface tracking. Additional sensors monitored trunk and humeral motion. Scapular position data at end range glenohumeral internal rotation, along with glenohumeral internal rotation range of motion measurements, were used to analyze the relationship between glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and scapular position using 2-way ANOVA and regression analyses. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Results:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The internal rotation deficit group had significantly greater scapular anterior tilt (9.2&deg; difference, P = .04) across positions, as compared to the control group. Regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and scapular position (tilting) during flexed internal rotation (r</span><sup><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">2</span></sup><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">= 0.37, P = .03) and for scapular position (anterior tilting and upward rotation) during abducted internal rotation (r</span><sup><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">2</span></sup><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">= 0.35, P = .036). </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Conclusions:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">These findings demonstrate a significant relationship between glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and abnormal scapular positioning, particularly increased anterior tilt. This relationship identifies a possible mechanism for development of excessive scapular anterior tilt. </span><p style="margin: 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(12):926- 934.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2241</span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&nbsp;</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Key Words:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">biomechanics, rotator cuff, scapula, shoulder</span></p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1218/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Knee Joint Stiffness in Individuals With and Without Knee Osteoarthritis: A Preliminary Study</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1219/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.carolaoatis/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Carol A. Oatis</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.edwardfwolff/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Edward F. Wolff</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.sandraklennon/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Sandra K. Lennon</a><br /><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Study Design:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Descriptive, case-matched comparison. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Objectives:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">To compare the knee joint stiffness and damping coefficients of individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) to those of age- and gender-matched individuals without KOA. A secondary purpose was to investigate relationships between these coefficients and complaints of stiffness in individuals with KOA. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Background:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">KOA is a leading cause of disability, and stiffness is a common complaint in individuals with KOA. Yet the most common method of assessing knee joint stiffness is through a self-report questionnaire. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Methods and Measures:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Stiffness and damping coefficients at the knee were calculated in 10 volunteers (mean age &plusmn; SD, 64.1 &plusmn; 15.5 years) with KOA and compared to coefficients from age- and gender-matched individuals without KOA, collected in a previous study (mean age &plusmn; SD, 62.1 &plusmn; 13.9 years). Stiffness and damping coefficients were calculated from the angular motion of the knee during a relaxed oscillation. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated between </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">stiffness and damping coefficients and WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) scores for subjects with KOA. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Results:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Independent 2-tailed <em>t </em>tests revealed significantly larger damping coefficients (<em>P</em> = .035) among those with KOA (95% CI, 0.10-2.32 Nm s/rad). Spearman rank correlations revealed a significant positive relationship (<em>r</em> = .85, <em>P</em> = .003) between the damping coefficient and the stiffness subscore of the WOMAC.</span> <strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Conclusion:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">This study offers preliminary data demonstrating the feasibility of measuring stiffness and damping coefficients in individuals with KOA. Additionally, the damping coefficient is increased in people with KOA when compared to age- and gender-matched individuals without KOA. The damping coefficient appears to be associated with the complaints of stiffness reported by the WOMAC. </span><p style="margin: 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(12):935-941.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2320</span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&nbsp;</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Key Words:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">arthritis, pendulum test, tibiofemoral joint, WOMAC</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1219/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comparison of Different Structural Foot Types for Measures of Standing Postural Control</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1220/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.liangchingtsai/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Liang-Ching Tsai</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.bingyu/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Bing Yu</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.vickismercer/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Vicki S. Mercer</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaeltgross/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Michael T. Gross</a><br /><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Study Design:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Matched group comparison of 3 subject groups with 3 different foot structures for force plate and clinical measures of postural control. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Objectives:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">To determine if subjects with different weight-bearing foot structure would demonstrate differences in static standing postural control, and to determine the reliability of study procedures. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Background:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Weight-bearing foot structure may influence postural control either because of a decreased base of support (supinated foot structure) or because of passive instability of the joints of the foot (pronated foot structure). </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Methods and Measures:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Young adults were categorized based on weight-bearing foot structure into neutral, pronated, or supinated groups (15 subjects per group). Postural control in single-limb stance with eyes closed was assessed using force plate measures and by measuring duration of single-limb stance on a firm floor and on a balance pad. Force plate measures were normalized center-of-pressure average speed, and standard deviation and maximum displacement in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Results:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Individuals in the supinated group had significantly greater center-of-pressure average speed, greater maximum displacement in the anterior-posterior direction, and greater SD and maximum displacement in the medial-lateral direction than individuals in the neutral group. The individuals in the pronated group had significantly greater SD and maximum displacement in the anterior-posterior direction, used more trials to complete force plate testing, and had shorter single-limb stance duration than those in the neutral group.</span> <strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Conclusion:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Individuals with pronated feet or supinated feet have poorer postural control than individuals with neutral feet, but perhaps through different mechanisms. </span><p style="margin: 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(12):942-953.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2336</span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&nbsp;</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Key Words:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">balance, feet, pronation, supination</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1220/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sagittal Plane Knee Motion in the ACL-Deficient Knee During Body Weight Shift Exercises on Different Support Surfaces</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1221/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.joannakvist/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Joanna Kvist</a><br /><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Study Design:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Experimental design with group comparisons. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Objectives:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">To compare anterior tibial translation and muscle activity among different exercises for early weight-bearing and neuromuscular training in individuals with a unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and in uninjured controls. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Background:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The effects of exercise and activity on tibial translation must be taken into consideration during rehabilitation after ACL injury. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Methods and Measures:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Twelve patients with an ACL-deficient knee and 12 age- and gender-matched controls participated in the study. Sagittal tibial translation and muscle activity were registered during the Lachman test (static translation) and 4 body weight shift exercises (dynamic translation). A Student t test with Bonferroni correction and analysis of variance were used for the statistical analysis. </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Results:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Forward-backward body weight shift exercise resulted in smaller anterior tibial translation compared to body weight shift from side to side. Analysis of EMG activity could not explain this difference in anterior tibial translation. The amount of anterior tibial translation or EMG activity did not change when the exercises were performed on a trampoline compared to a firm surface.</span> <strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Conclusions:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Forward-backward weight shifting may be preferable in initial rehabilitation after ACL injury compared to body weight shift from side to side. </span><p style="margin: 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36(12):954-962.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.2290</span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">&nbsp;</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><font color="#000000">Key Words:</font> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">EMG, functional joint stability, knee kinematics, rehabilitation</span></p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1221/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Letters to the Editor-in-Chief</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1224/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.michaeltcibulka/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Michael T. Cibulka</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.philippaultygiel/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Philip Paul Tygiel</a>, <a href="http://www.jospt.org/rss/author.anthonydelitto/author.asp"  target="_blank"  >Anthony Delitto</a><br /><p>Letters to the Editor-in-Chief published in the December 2006 issue of the <em>Journal</em>.</p><p><em>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(12):963-967.</em> doi:10.2519/jospt.2006.0202</p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1224/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>2006 Author Index</title>
<link>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1222/article_detail.asp</link>
<description><![CDATA[<br /><p>This index includes all authors and co-authors of manuscripts published in the <em>Journal</em> during 2006.</p><p><em>&nbsp;J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(12):969-991.</em></p>]]></description>
<guid>http://www.jospt.org/issues/articleID.1222/article_detail.asp</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>
