Abstract
Objective
To determine how well the functional comorbidity index (FCI) predicts outcomes in older adults with back pain compared to Quan's modification of the Charlson comorbidity index (Quan-Charlson comorbidity index) and the Elixhauser comorbidity index.
Design
Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study.
Methods
We included 5155 adults 65 years of age or older with new primary care visits for back pain. Comorbidity was measured using diagnosis codes 12 months prior to the new visit. Outcomes of functional limitation (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), health-related quality of life (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions [EQ-5D]), and total health care use (sum of relative value units) were measured 12 months after the new visit. We compared multivariable models containing preselected prognostic factors.
Results
Spearman correlation coefficients among the indices were 0.70 or greater. Multivariable models for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire had similar R2 and root-mean-square error (RMSE) of prediction when using the FCI (R2 = 0.190; RMSE, 6.19), Quan-Charlson comorbidity index (R2 = 0.185; RMSE, 6.20), or Elixhauser comorbidity index (R2 = 0.189; RMSE, 6.19). Multivariable models for the EQ-5D score showed small differences in R2 and RMSE when using the FCI (R2 = 0.157; RMSE, 0.163), Quan-Charlson comorbidity index (R2 = 0.148; RMSE, 0.164), or Elixhauser comorbidity index (R2 = 0.154; RMSE, 0.163). Multivariable models for health care use had similar Akaike information criterion (AIC) values when using the FCI (AIC = 10.04), Quan-Charlson comorbidity index (AIC = 10.04), or Elixhauser comorbidity index (AIC = 10.01).
Conclusion
All indices performed similarly in predicting outcomes. There does not seem to be an advantage to using one index over another for older adults with back pain. There is still a need to develop better function-based risk-adjustment models that improve prediction of functional outcomes versus standard comorbidity indices. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50(3):143–148. Epub 23 Jul 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.8764
References
- 1.
American Physical Therapy Association . Physical Therapy Outcomes Registry. Available at: http://www.ptoutcomes.com/home.aspx?navID%20=%2010737435589. AccessedJune 1, 2015 . Google Scholar - 2. A comparison of the performance of the EQ-5D and SF-6D for individuals aged ± 45 years. Health Econ. 2008; 17: 815– 832. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1298 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 3. Setting value-based payment goals—HHS efforts to improve U.S. health care. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 897– 899. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1500445 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 4. Low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 42: A1– A57. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.42.4.A1 Link Google Scholar
- 5. Unpacking the burden: understanding the relationships between chronic pain and comorbidity in the general population. Pain. 2012; 153: 293– 304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.09.018 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 6. Comparison of three comorbidity measures for predicting health service use in patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 53: 666– 672. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21440 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 7. Problem areas identified as important to older adults with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2015; 15: 1636– 1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.008 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 8. Associations between relative value units and patient-reported back pain and disability. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2017; 3: 2333721416686019. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721416686019 Crossref Google Scholar
- 9. Benchmarking outpatient rehabilitation clinics using functional status outcomes. Health Serv Res. 2016; 51: 768– 789. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12344 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 10. The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58: 595– 602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.018 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 11. Back pain in seniors: the Back pain Outcomes using Longitudinal Data (BOLD) cohort baseline data. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014; 15: 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-134 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 12. Long-term outcomes of a large, prospective observational cohort of older adults with back pain. Spine J. 2018; 18: 1540– 1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.018 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 13. Examining the association between comorbidity indexes and functional status in hospitalized Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Phys Ther. 2016; 96: 232– 240. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150039 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 14. Comparing comorbidity indices to predict post–acute rehabilitation outcomes in older adults. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 95: 889– 898. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000527 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 15. Prevalence and impact of pain among older adults in the United States: findings from the 2011 National Health and Aging Trends Study. Pain. 2013; 154: 2649– 2657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.029 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 16. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20: 1899– 1908; discussion 1909. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199509000-00011 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 17. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005; 43: 1130– 1139. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 18. Systematic review of comorbidity indices for administrative data. Med Care. 2012; 50: 1109– 1118. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825f64d0 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 19. PROGnosis RESearch Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research. PLoS Med. 2013; 10: e1001381. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001381 Crossref Medline Google Scholar
- 20. A systematic review identifies valid comorbidity indices derived from administrative health data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68: 3– 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.010 Crossref Medline Google Scholar



